Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International ... - STIBA Malang

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Introduction xiii of Modern English. The analysis shows that in the coordination of adverbs one strongly dominant pattern remains constant, i.e., X-ly and Y-ly, while the minority patterns X and Y-ly and X-ly and Y are rare in the written texts examined. This can be explained by the fact that considerations of symmetry overcome the desire to avoid repetition of the -ly suffix, which has often been suggested for sequences of adverbs or adverbial modifiers in which the zero form appears. It is generally assumed that the construction It is me emerged in the 16th century as a more colloquial alternative to It is I. In their paper, Claudia Lange and Ursula Schaefer focus on the structure and distribution of two constructions featuring It is I / me, namely, cleft constructions and identificational copular clauses in plays from 1600 to 1800. The analysis shows that it is I constitutes the generally preferred form; the very limited number of occurrences of me in the relevant constructions are either licensed by the syntactic context in cleft constructions or by referential conditions in identificational copular clauses. Lange and Schaefer further provide evidence for the assumption that identificational copular clauses are historically prior to cleft constructions, which in turn are not fully grammaticalised in the period under discussion, since they do not unambiguously display the biclausal structure which is a defining property of clefts. Thomas Egan’s paper traces the evolution of to-infinitive complement constructions with emotion matrix verbs like, love, hate and prefer over the past two hundred years. His analysis proposes that when the matrix verb is not preceded by a modal auxiliary, these constructions should be analysed in Present-day English as encoding general rather than specific predications. In Late Modern English, on the other hand, these same constructions were widely used to encode specific predications. Using data from The British National Corpus and The Corpus of Late Modern English Texts, the author demonstrates how these constructions have become increasingly restricted to encoding general predications over the past two centuries. This development is related to the parallel expansion of –ing-complement constructions and of to-infinitive complement constructions with modalised matrix verbs. The aim of Svenja Kranich’s study is to analyse the progressive form in 17th- and 18th-century English, identifying its uses as expressions of speaker attitude. After an overview of the Old and Middle English meanings of the progressive, the paper discusses the three different types of subjective progressives found in data from ARCHER-2. In this context, the author discusses some methodological issues, as formal criteria have proved insufficiently reliable for the distinction of subjective uses. Kranich then looks at the relation between subjective and other meanings of the progressive. In the 17th- and 18th centuries, the aspectual function of the progressive grammaticalises, which leads to changing relative frequencies between subjective and objective uses. The paper ends with the identification
xiv Maurizio Gotti, Marina Dossena & Richard Dury of general tendencies in the relation between grammaticalisation and subjectification/objectification. As illustrated in this brief overview, the studies presented here are an expression of ongoing theoretical developments as well as new analytical approaches to the study of English diachronic syntax and morphology. Together, they reflect the challenges and opportunities that confront a linguist working with complex developments in a language, and their far-reaching implications. It is to be hoped that the volume will encourage further discussion and reflection, strengthening our understanding of the evolution of these phenomena. References Bertinetto, Pier Marco, Karen H. Ebert & Casper de Groot. 2000. The Progressive in Europe. Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe ed. by Östen Dahl, 517–558. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at Work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kabak, Barış. 2007. Turkish Suspended Affixation. Linguistics 45: 311–348. Pounder, Amanda. 2004. Haplology in English Adverb Formation. New Perspectives on English Historical Linguistics: Selected papers from 12 ICEHL, Glasgow, 21–26 August 2002 ed. by Christian Kay. Carole Hough & Irené Wotherspoon, Volume II: Lexis and Transmission, 193–211. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Page 2 and 3: English historical linguistics 2006
Page 4 and 5: English historical linguistics 2006
Page 6 and 7: Table of contents Foreword vii Intr
Page 8 and 9: Foreword The conference at which th
Page 10 and 11: Introduction Maurizio Gotti, Marina
Page 12 and 13: Introduction xi than one gender. Th
Page 16: part i Old and Middle English
Page 19 and 20: Ans van Kemenade, Tanja Milicev & R
Page 25 and 26: 10 Ans van Kemenade, Tanja Milicev
Page 29 and 30: 1 Ans van Kemenade, Tanja Milicev &
Page 38 and 39: The Old English copula weorðan and
Page 40 and 41: Old English weorðan and its replac
Page 46 and 47: G NP.Subj WIERÐ PPLE.SubjComp …
Page 50 and 51: 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20
Page 52 and 53: 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20
Page 64 and 65:
Verb types and word order in Old an
Page 66 and 67:
Verb types and word order 51 also i
Page 68 and 69:
Verb types and word order 53 typica
Page 70 and 71:
Table 4. Verb types in early ME non
Page 72 and 73:
Verb types and word order 57 patter
Page 74 and 75:
Verb types and word order 59 great
Page 76 and 77:
Verb types and word order 61 comple
Page 78 and 79:
Verb types and word order 63 (12) H
Page 80 and 81:
Verb types and word order 65 non-co
Page 82:
Verb types and word order 67 Sweet,
Page 85 and 86:
70 Kristin Killie Opinions concerni
Page 87 and 88:
72 Kristin Killie Examples of the d
Page 89 and 90:
74 Kristin Killie locative meaning,
Page 91 and 92:
76 Kristin Killie ing of this perip
Page 93 and 94:
78 Kristin Killie ða wæs growende
Page 95 and 96:
80 Kristin Killie Table 2. Function
Page 97 and 98:
82 Kristin Killie (14) Ða dyde þe
Page 99 and 100:
84 Kristin Killie is, of course, no
Page 101 and 102:
86 Kristin Killie It is possible th
Page 103 and 104:
88 Kristin Killie Comrie, Bernard.
Page 105 and 106:
90 Letizia Vezzosi (Campbell 1959;
Page 107 and 108:
9 Letizia Vezzosi In a sense, all g
Page 109 and 110:
9 Letizia Vezzosi form to agree wit
Page 111 and 112:
9 Letizia Vezzosi b. [Genesis 2382-
Page 113 and 114:
9 Letizia Vezzosi of gender assignm
Page 115 and 116:
100 Letizia Vezzosi .1 Third type o
Page 117 and 118:
10 Letizia Vezzosi where its semant
Page 119 and 120:
10 Letizia Vezzosi a phenomenon of
Page 121 and 122:
10 Letizia Vezzosi North Germanic l
Page 123 and 124:
10 Letizia Vezzosi Lazzeroni, Roman
Page 125 and 126:
110 Tomohiro Yanagi The sentences i
Page 127 and 128:
112 Tomohiro Yanagi given in (8) an
Page 129 and 130:
114 Tomohiro Yanagi b. Ealle ge me
Page 131 and 132:
116 Tomohiro Yanagi (17) accusative
Page 133 and 134:
118 Tomohiro Yanagi 4. Syntactic po
Page 135 and 136:
120 Tomohiro Yanagi for by assuming
Page 137 and 138:
122 Tomohiro Yanagi general assumpt
Page 139 and 140:
124 Tomohiro Yanagi Koopman, Willem
Page 141 and 142:
126 Richard Ingham & Kleanthes K. G
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
142 Cristina Suárez-Gómez between
Page 159 and 160:
144 Cristina Suárez-Gómez The cor
Page 161 and 162:
146 Cristina Suárez-Gómez English
Page 163 and 164:
148 Cristina Suárez-Gómez (7) se
Page 165 and 166:
150 Cristina Suárez-Gómez For the
Page 167 and 168:
152 Cristina Suárez-Gómez either
Page 169 and 170:
154 Cristina Suárez-Gómez The res
Page 171 and 172:
156 Cristina Suárez-Gómez Older L
Page 173 and 174:
158 Bettelou Los e. He threw all th
Page 175 and 176:
160 Bettelou Los prepositions (by,
Page 177 and 178:
162 Bettelou Los The non-acceptabil
Page 179 and 180:
164 Bettelou Los (diary/scandal, ol
Page 181 and 182:
166 Bettelou Los . Grammaticalizati
Page 183 and 184:
168 Bettelou Los c. Bill pushed Har
Page 185 and 186:
170 Bettelou Los 4. Earlier English
Page 187 and 188:
172 Bettelou Los mainly with ‘lig
Page 189 and 190:
174 Bettelou Los verbs (e.g., group
Page 191 and 192:
176 Bettelou Los It seems, then, th
Page 193 and 194:
178 Bettelou Los Emonds, J. (1985).
Page 196:
part ii Early and Late Modern Engli
Page 199 and 200:
184 Amanda Pounder of English and c
Page 201 and 202:
186 Amanda Pounder (7) shows the ze
Page 203 and 204:
188 Amanda Pounder It is likely tha
Page 205 and 206:
190 Amanda Pounder The type is atte
Page 207 and 208:
192 Amanda Pounder minority asymmet
Page 209 and 210:
194 Amanda Pounder adjective in the
Page 211 and 212:
196 Amanda Pounder Here, the prever
Page 213 and 214:
198 Amanda Pounder While it is true
Page 215 and 216:
200 Amanda Pounder Aulnoy, Marie. 1
Page 218 and 219:
’Tis he, ’tis she, ’tis me,
Page 220 and 221:
or with a ‘specificational’ obj
Page 222 and 223:
Cleft and identificational construc
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236:
Page 239 and 240:
224 Thomas Egan with to-infinitive
Page 241 and 242:
226 Thomas Egan ( ) However, no mon
Page 243 and 244:
228 Thomas Egan 100 80 60 40 20 0 h
Page 245 and 246:
2 0 Thomas Egan 16,00 14,00 12,00 1
Page 247 and 248:
2 2 Thomas Egan 1,20 1,00 0,80 0,60
Page 249 and 250:
2 4 Thomas Egan Deprived of their c
Page 251 and 252:
2 6 Thomas Egan the ‘would like t
Page 253 and 254:
2 8 Thomas Egan One may perhaps sti
Page 255 and 256:
240 Thomas Egan Stephens, James (b.
Page 257 and 258:
4 Svenja Kranich Fitzmaurice 2004a,
Page 259 and 260:
44 Svenja Kranich feature of the ma
Page 261 and 262:
4 Svenja Kranich It is not easy to
Page 263 and 264:
4 Svenja Kranich as stative). A muc
Page 265 and 266:
0 Svenja Kranich description which
Page 267 and 268:
Svenja Kranich . Subjective and obj
Page 269 and 270:
4 Svenja Kranich a decrease or loss
Page 271 and 272:
Svenja Kranich Rydén, Mats. 997. O
Page 273 and 274:
258 Index of subjects, terms & lang
Page 275 and 276:
CURRENT ISSUES IN LINGUISTIC THEORY
Page 277 and 278:
252 Kay, Christian J., Carole houGh
Page 279 and 280:
198 nieMeier, susanne and rené Dir
Page 281 and 282:
137 liPPi-Green, rosina l. and Jose
Page 283 and 284:
76 wiCKens, Mark a.: Grammatical Nu
Page 285:
13 Maher, J. Peter, allan r. BoMhar
show all

Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International ... - STIBA Malang

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?