15.06.2013 Views

Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International ... - STIBA Malang

Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International ... - STIBA Malang

Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International ... - STIBA Malang

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5. Concluding remarks<br />

On <strong>the</strong> position of <strong>the</strong> OE quantifier eall and PDE all 123<br />

It has been shown in this paper, through a study of <strong>the</strong> corpus of Ælfric’s Catholic<br />

Homilies, that <strong>the</strong> OE quantifier eall shares <strong>the</strong> following distributional properties<br />

with <strong>the</strong> PDE quantifier all: (i) eall can float <strong>from</strong> a nominative, or subject, noun<br />

phrase it modifies; (ii) eall can float <strong>from</strong> an accusative, or object, noun phrase,<br />

that is followed by a predicative complement; and (iii) <strong>the</strong> ‘pronoun-quantifier’<br />

order is more frequent than <strong>the</strong> ‘quantifier-pronoun’ order. It was also argued that<br />

<strong>the</strong> quantifier eall is base-generated as <strong>the</strong> head of a QP and selects an NP as its<br />

complement. The ‘full-NP-quantifier’ order can be derived by adjoining <strong>the</strong> NP to<br />

<strong>the</strong> QP. However, this operation is not applied to an NP in <strong>the</strong> argument position,<br />

due to <strong>the</strong> ban on adjunction to arguments. Unlike NPs, pronouns are adjoined<br />

to <strong>the</strong> head of a QP, yielding <strong>the</strong> ‘pronoun-quantifier’ order. The head-adjunction<br />

may be driven by <strong>the</strong> clitic property of pronouns. If so, <strong>the</strong>re remains a question:<br />

why is <strong>the</strong> ‘quantifier-pronoun’ order observed though it is less frequent than <strong>the</strong><br />

‘pronoun-quantifier’ order? This is left open for future research.<br />

References<br />

Abney, Steven. 1987. The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT.<br />

Baltin, Mark. 1995. Floating Quantifiers, PRO, and Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 26:<br />

199–248.<br />

Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2003. Floating Quantifiers: Handle with Care. The Second Glot<br />

<strong>International</strong> State-of-<strong>the</strong>-Article Book: The Latest in Linguistics ed. by Lisa Cheng & Rint<br />

Sybesma, 107–148. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.<br />

Bošcović, Željko. 1997. The Syntax of Nonfinite Complementation: An Economy Approach.<br />

Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.<br />

Bošcović, Željko. 2004. Be Careful Where You Float Your Quantifiers. Natural Language and<br />

Linguistic Theory 22: 671–742.<br />

Bowers, John. 2001. Predication. The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory ed. by Mark<br />

Baltin & Chris Collins, 299–333. Oxford: Blackwell.<br />

Carlson, Anita M. 1978. A Diachronic Treatment of English Quantifiers. Lingua 46: 295–328.<br />

Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.<br />

Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory. The View <strong>from</strong> Building 20<br />

ed. by Kenneth Hale & Samuel J. Keyser, 1–52. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.<br />

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.<br />

Clemoes, Peter. 1997. Ælfric’s Catholic Homilies: The First Series. EETS SS 17.<br />

Giusti, Giuliana. 1991. The Categorial Status of Quantified Nominals. Linguistische Berichte<br />

136: 438–454.<br />

Godden, Malcolm. 1979. Ælfric’s Catholic Homilies: The Second Series. EETS SS 5.<br />

Kemenade, Ans van. 1987. Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in <strong>the</strong> History of English.<br />

Dordrecht: Foris.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!