14.06.2013 Views

ÇAĞRILI KONUŞMALAR / KEYNOTES Invited Speeches ... - TPJD

ÇAĞRILI KONUŞMALAR / KEYNOTES Invited Speeches ... - TPJD

ÇAĞRILI KONUŞMALAR / KEYNOTES Invited Speeches ... - TPJD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Vertical and Horizontal Wells Productivity Index Comparison and Performance<br />

Prediction with Tank Type Reservoir Model in the Single and Double Porosity;<br />

Isotropic and Anisotropic Reservoirs.<br />

Harun Kırmacı, Mustafa Onur<br />

İstanbul Technical University, Faculty of Mines, Department of Petroleum and Natural Gas<br />

Engineering, İstanbul<br />

In today’s world, increasing demand of energy has forced Petroleum Companies to search<br />

different ways to increase their production. Therefore, Petroleum companies test wells which<br />

take longer time and they try to find out the most economic production scenarios to increase<br />

the oil/gas production of the wells. As a result, modelling the reservoir as realistic as possible,<br />

determining the performance of reservoirs and the productivity of wells are more important. In<br />

this work, we present productivity index equations for vertical and horizontal wells, productivity<br />

in homogeneous, isotropic or anisotropic closed reservoirs and couple them with a tank model<br />

for performance prediction. By using the model developed during the course of this work, we<br />

compare the results for different well and reservoir types. The results show that the models<br />

presented in this work provide a simple, yet quite accurate performance predictions for vertical<br />

and horizontal wells producing in isotropic/anisotropic single or double porosity reservoirs.<br />

Keywords: Vertical Well, Horizontal Well, Single Porosity Reservoir, Double Porosity Reservoir,<br />

Tank Model<br />

279

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!