14.06.2013 Views

Teacher's Guide Cambridge Pre-U MUSIC Available for teaching ...

Teacher's Guide Cambridge Pre-U MUSIC Available for teaching ...

Teacher's Guide Cambridge Pre-U MUSIC Available for teaching ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Component 43: Free Composition<br />

<strong>Cambridge</strong> <strong>Pre</strong>-U Teacher <strong>Guide</strong><br />

Most of the observations made above in relation to Component 3, Section C apply equally to<br />

Component 43 and should be taken as part of the guidance <strong>for</strong> both components. They include<br />

the comments about teacher supervision and guidance and about the duration of compositions,<br />

bearing in mind the stipulation that the total quantity of work involved in Component 43 must be<br />

commensurate with its weighting (i.e. one quarter of that required <strong>for</strong> the whole Syllabus). They also<br />

include the encouragement of live per<strong>for</strong>mance as a significant aspect of the learning process.<br />

One important difference between Component 43 on the one hand and Component 3, Section C on<br />

the other is that in Component 43 all submitted compositions must be presented in some <strong>for</strong>m of<br />

staff notation. Thus the only <strong>for</strong>ms of music technology permitted here are (a) computer notation<br />

programs to generate the score and (b) sequenced recordings, which are permitted if it is not possible<br />

to record a live per<strong>for</strong>mance. Candidates who wish to compose music involving electro-acoustic<br />

sounds should take Component 44 rather than Component 43. Within those constraints there is no<br />

restriction on the style of music that candidates may compose; indeed, it is positively hoped that this<br />

component will stimulate as wide a range of different styles as possible. There is no provision <strong>for</strong><br />

arrangements to be submitted in this component.<br />

The requirement <strong>for</strong> a written commentary on the two contrasting compositions, of course, goes<br />

beyond what is necessary <strong>for</strong> the commissioned composition. The intention of this requirement is<br />

that the commentary should act as a focus <strong>for</strong> considered reflection on the process of composing<br />

that is individual to each candidate and to each piece, based on the framework given in the Syllabus.<br />

Candidates may find it helpful to approach this framework with a number of questions in mind about<br />

each heading. These might include some or all of the following suggestions:<br />

A description of the expressive intention of each piece<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

What was my initial stimulus <strong>for</strong> each composition?<br />

Was it a musical idea (e.g. a tune, a chord, a rhythm, a technique)?<br />

Or was it an extra-musical idea (e.g. a descriptive title, a picture, a poem, a story)?<br />

Or was it something else (which would need to be explained)?<br />

How did I hope to express these stimuli at the start of the compositional process?<br />

An explanation of the ways in which contrast between the pieces has been achieved<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

In what ways do my compositions contrast with each other?<br />

Are they different in style? In which case, how would I describe their styles?<br />

Are they different in the <strong>for</strong>ces they require? In which case, why did I choose to compose <strong>for</strong><br />

these particular <strong>for</strong>ces?<br />

Are they different in structure? In which case, where did my ideas about the structure of each<br />

piece originate? How would I describe the structure of each piece?<br />

Are they different in some other way (which would need to be explained)?<br />

www.cie.org.uk/cambridgepreu 77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!