14.06.2013 Views

Teacher's Guide Cambridge Pre-U MUSIC Available for teaching ...

Teacher's Guide Cambridge Pre-U MUSIC Available for teaching ...

Teacher's Guide Cambridge Pre-U MUSIC Available for teaching ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Cambridge</strong> <strong>Pre</strong>-U Teacher <strong>Guide</strong><br />

The written project requires some of the same skills that are needed <strong>for</strong> Section A of Paper 11, but<br />

there are important differences. In Paper 11 the question will always list some of the features of<br />

the two per<strong>for</strong>mances that candidates are expected to write about, whereas in the written project,<br />

candidates must decide <strong>for</strong> themselves which aspects of the per<strong>for</strong>mances they wish to address. The<br />

careful selection of these aspects will clearly be an important part of the success of the project. In<br />

Paper 11 the music is likely to be unfamiliar, whereas in the written project it will be a piece that is<br />

very well known. This implies a greater level of detail in the way candidates write about the music,<br />

and a more thorough understanding of its style.<br />

It is essential that candidates try to focus on significant features of the recordings they compare. For<br />

example, they should not spend a large amount of time working out the precise metronome markings<br />

of every slightest change of tempo in the per<strong>for</strong>mances, even though differences in tempo may be<br />

a significant aspect of the contrast between them. It is more important that they should attempt to<br />

analyse and explain the ways in which differences in tempo reflect the per<strong>for</strong>mers’ interpretations of<br />

the piece, how this affects their impact on the listener, and the extent to which the per<strong>for</strong>mances reflect<br />

an understanding of the style of the music (and, in some cases, the composer’s known or presumed<br />

intentions). Above all, the project should act as a focus <strong>for</strong> considered reflection on candidates’ own<br />

interpretations of the music they play, and the process of making in<strong>for</strong>med interpretative decisions.<br />

COMPOSING<br />

Component 3<br />

Sections A and B: Stylistic Exercises (Examination and Coursework)<br />

Stylistic imitation is a traditional method of study that has often been taught in a highly theoretical<br />

way, as a series of exercises on paper that bears little relation to a genuine perception of the music as<br />

music. It is highly desirable that candidates should experience the music as something that comes to<br />

life when it is sung or played, and taking part in some kind of live per<strong>for</strong>mance ought to be seen as an<br />

essential aspect of the <strong>teaching</strong> and learning process – even if it is done only in workshop sessions as<br />

an adjunct to more theoretical lessons. It is especially beneficial to sing or play a middle part, or the<br />

bass if that is feasible, because this can provide a better insight into the way the music fits together<br />

than hours of working things out on paper.<br />

The options available to candidates have been divided into two groups and candidates must select<br />

one genre from each group:<br />

•<br />

•<br />

Group A<br />

Chorale Harmonisations in the style of J S Bach<br />

String Quartets in the Classical style<br />

Group B<br />

String Quartets in the Classical style (only if Chorale Harmonisations are chosen in Group A)<br />

Two-part Baroque counterpoint (only if String Quartets are chosen in Group A)<br />

Keyboard accompaniments in early Romantic style<br />

Music in Jazz, Popular and Show styles (1920–1950)<br />

www.cie.org.uk/cambridgepreu 71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!