Teacher's Guide Cambridge Pre-U MUSIC Available for teaching ...
Teacher's Guide Cambridge Pre-U MUSIC Available for teaching ...
Teacher's Guide Cambridge Pre-U MUSIC Available for teaching ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Cambridge</strong> <strong>Pre</strong>-U Teacher <strong>Guide</strong><br />
The written project requires some of the same skills that are needed <strong>for</strong> Section A of Paper 11, but<br />
there are important differences. In Paper 11 the question will always list some of the features of<br />
the two per<strong>for</strong>mances that candidates are expected to write about, whereas in the written project,<br />
candidates must decide <strong>for</strong> themselves which aspects of the per<strong>for</strong>mances they wish to address. The<br />
careful selection of these aspects will clearly be an important part of the success of the project. In<br />
Paper 11 the music is likely to be unfamiliar, whereas in the written project it will be a piece that is<br />
very well known. This implies a greater level of detail in the way candidates write about the music,<br />
and a more thorough understanding of its style.<br />
It is essential that candidates try to focus on significant features of the recordings they compare. For<br />
example, they should not spend a large amount of time working out the precise metronome markings<br />
of every slightest change of tempo in the per<strong>for</strong>mances, even though differences in tempo may be<br />
a significant aspect of the contrast between them. It is more important that they should attempt to<br />
analyse and explain the ways in which differences in tempo reflect the per<strong>for</strong>mers’ interpretations of<br />
the piece, how this affects their impact on the listener, and the extent to which the per<strong>for</strong>mances reflect<br />
an understanding of the style of the music (and, in some cases, the composer’s known or presumed<br />
intentions). Above all, the project should act as a focus <strong>for</strong> considered reflection on candidates’ own<br />
interpretations of the music they play, and the process of making in<strong>for</strong>med interpretative decisions.<br />
COMPOSING<br />
Component 3<br />
Sections A and B: Stylistic Exercises (Examination and Coursework)<br />
Stylistic imitation is a traditional method of study that has often been taught in a highly theoretical<br />
way, as a series of exercises on paper that bears little relation to a genuine perception of the music as<br />
music. It is highly desirable that candidates should experience the music as something that comes to<br />
life when it is sung or played, and taking part in some kind of live per<strong>for</strong>mance ought to be seen as an<br />
essential aspect of the <strong>teaching</strong> and learning process – even if it is done only in workshop sessions as<br />
an adjunct to more theoretical lessons. It is especially beneficial to sing or play a middle part, or the<br />
bass if that is feasible, because this can provide a better insight into the way the music fits together<br />
than hours of working things out on paper.<br />
The options available to candidates have been divided into two groups and candidates must select<br />
one genre from each group:<br />
•<br />
•<br />
Group A<br />
Chorale Harmonisations in the style of J S Bach<br />
String Quartets in the Classical style<br />
Group B<br />
String Quartets in the Classical style (only if Chorale Harmonisations are chosen in Group A)<br />
Two-part Baroque counterpoint (only if String Quartets are chosen in Group A)<br />
Keyboard accompaniments in early Romantic style<br />
Music in Jazz, Popular and Show styles (1920–1950)<br />
www.cie.org.uk/cambridgepreu 71