14.06.2013 Views

Teacher's Guide Cambridge Pre-U MUSIC Available for teaching ...

Teacher's Guide Cambridge Pre-U MUSIC Available for teaching ...

Teacher's Guide Cambridge Pre-U MUSIC Available for teaching ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Cambridge</strong> <strong>Pre</strong>-U Teacher <strong>Guide</strong><br />

Klingsor, but also the suffering of his victim, Am<strong>for</strong>tas. This helps to bring to life the otherwise<br />

rather passive character of Am<strong>for</strong>tas, and makes a telling and very human point about the ways in<br />

which praiseworthy aspirations can all too often be compromised. Similarly, the music depicting the<br />

Knights of the Grail as they assemble <strong>for</strong> the ceremony in the second part of Act I has been thought<br />

by some commentators to convey something of the rather smug self-satisfaction that can often be<br />

characteristic of those who believe themselves to be members of an elite group. While Klingsor’s<br />

motivations are wholly concerned with revenge, it is difficult to feel that the Grail brotherhood is one<br />

that he would necessarily have wanted to join: their strongly diatonic music suggests that they may<br />

have become rather too confident in their role as a chosen people.<br />

The heart of the drama lies in Act II and in the astonishingly perceptive scene between Parsifal and<br />

Kundry. Her attempt to make a parallel between maternal love and sexual love has clear Freudian<br />

implications and some of the music through which this is expressed has a disturbing voluptuousness<br />

that is equally ahead of its time. The stages of Parsifal’s self-discovery, and the increasingly desperate<br />

ploys used by Kundry to try to prevent it, are portrayed in some of Wagner’s most tellingly purposeful<br />

music. However much his view of the relationship between words and music may have changed in<br />

the thirty years since he wrote Oper und Drama, the integration of music with the demands of the<br />

drama is as complete in this scene as in any of his other works.<br />

In a very real sense, however, the music propels the drama of Parsifal far more than either the words<br />

or the stage action, which is often extremely static. Wagner was all too well aware of the intrinsic<br />

problem of a drama in which a great deal of background has to be explained: that had been his<br />

primary motive <strong>for</strong> extending the Ring back in time from his initial idea of a single drama based on<br />

Siegfried’s death. In Parsifal he had no alternative but to incorporate the background to the story into<br />

the text of Act I, the first part of which is largely taken up by Gurnemanz’s narration of events that<br />

took place in the past. In the absence of virtually all stage action, it is the orchestral music that has to<br />

carry this scene and show the significance of what Gurnemanz describes. This may account <strong>for</strong> one<br />

of the principal differences between Parsifal and Wagner’s other mature dramas: with only a single<br />

exception the main leitmotifs are all introduced first by the orchestra rather than in a vocal line (the<br />

exception being the ‘pure fool’ motif that belongs with the words of Am<strong>for</strong>tas’s vision). Not only is<br />

the role of the orchestra there<strong>for</strong>e more overtly significant in Parsifal than in even the latter stages<br />

of the Ring, but there is a particular quality about the orchestral sound that further distinguishes<br />

Parsifal from Wagner’s earlier works. Be<strong>for</strong>e he started the orchestration he had experienced the<br />

distinct acoustic of the Festspielhaus, with its hidden orchestra pit. Parsifal was orchestrated with<br />

this acoustic consciously in mind and the consequence was a much more blended sound, subtly<br />

refined and almost hieratic in effect. Wagner found an exact parallel in the orchestral sonority <strong>for</strong> the<br />

pronouncedly ritual character of the drama.<br />

Wagner described Parsifal as a Bühnenweihfestspiel – literally, a ‘festival play <strong>for</strong> the consecration of<br />

the stage’. The stage he had in mind was of course that of the Festspielhaus at Bayreuth and there<br />

is little doubt that he saw its per<strong>for</strong>mance there as imparting a quasi-religious consecration to the<br />

theatre itself and, by implication, to the festivals that were its raison d’être. The first per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

took place on 26 July 1882, conducted by Hermann Levi. Under the terms of Wagner’s agreement<br />

with the Munich Court Theatre following the per<strong>for</strong>mances of the Ring in 1976, Parsifal was to be<br />

given by per<strong>for</strong>mers from Munich, where Levi was the court Kapellmeister. Wagner was there<strong>for</strong>e<br />

obliged to accept him as the conductor, even though he objected to a Jewish musician directing an<br />

ostensibly Christian drama. There were sixteen per<strong>for</strong>mances in total and at the last of them Wagner<br />

www.cie.org.uk/cambridgepreu 33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!