Appellant, William Satele, Reply Brief - California Courts - State of ...
Appellant, William Satele, Reply Brief - California Courts - State of ...
Appellant, William Satele, Reply Brief - California Courts - State of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
she attributed to job-related stress. (18RT 4480:5-9.)<br />
Again, in response to the court's leading questions during this hearing held<br />
on a Monday, Juror No.9 said she experienced stress the previous Friday and that<br />
her continued participation in deliberations would cause her stress. (18RT<br />
4480:10-15.) She believed it would be in her best interests and the best interests<br />
<strong>of</strong>her unborn child ifshe were excused from the case. (18RT 4480:16-19.) It was<br />
her opinion that she would be unable to perform her duties as a juror. (18RT<br />
4480:20-25.)<br />
On the previous Friday, she began to feel the pains she had felt in the past.<br />
She tried, but was unable to see a doctor, and was going to try again today. (18RT<br />
4481:3-13.)<br />
<strong>Appellant</strong> here reiterates that the record fails to support the trial court's<br />
reasons for discharge <strong>of</strong> Juror No.9 to a demonstrable reality. (See AOB 287<br />
289.)<br />
In particular, the record does not support the trial court's finding that the<br />
juror's trial-related stress was linked to the following - "she has suffered one<br />
hemorrhage, and now she is having pains again starting Friday." (18RT 4483:27<br />
28.) Nor does the record support the court's fmding "that this juror is unable to<br />
perform the jury's duty because she's sick. I mean, she's got a stomach ache<br />
that's related to that pregnancy, and I'm excusing her." (18RT 4484:6-8.)<br />
The record shows that the juror's treating physician attributed the juror's<br />
hemorrhage to a hemorrhagic cyst and not to stress. (3SuppCT 817; 17RT 4225.)<br />
Thus, the court's reliance on this factor is not supported by evidence <strong>of</strong> a<br />
demonstrable reality.<br />
The court also found the juror was unable to continue because she was sick<br />
with pains related to her pregnancy. Juror No.9, however, said she experienced<br />
pains on the Friday before the Monday morning hearing. The juror gave no<br />
indication the pains continued throughout the weekend and were ongoing. (18RT<br />
4481:6-7.) Thus, the court's reliance on this factor is not supported by evidence <strong>of</strong><br />
148