LAST DITCH OF DEMOCRACY - Majority Rights

You do NOT believe in the abolition of ownership ? You do NOT
believe that you should be ruled from abroad by Kuhn, Loeb, and
Warburg, of the dregs of the ex-ghettoes of Europe, now planted on the
neck of the American people.
Have you any hold on the country ? Let us say on the Land?
I see it is increasingly difficult for any two men to meet outside London.
Who meets INSIDE London ? Do they still disagree about
EVERYTHING ? Do three social credit parties instantly arise wherever
two social creditors gather together?
Is there ANY common bond, apart from hysteria induced by your jewspapers?
Or the common interests of men who hire their “seats.”
I mean SEATS in the Commons. Difference between those seats and a
seat on the New York Stock Exchange is that in New York the men
BUY their seats, and in Westminster the members rent ’em. The New
York Stock Exchange system has an advantage; it may even be more
democratic. I never heard democracy discussed in this connection.
But a man BUYS his seat on Change, openly and the price is known, I
believe in most cases.
Whereas a member of Parliament is a renter, he is said to pay in an in
definite sum per year, to DEFRAY.
Defray is, I think, the word used, defray party expenses. Contribute to
the funds of the party.
That is democracy. Is it ? It has never been the American IDEAL of
representative government.
I have murmured on the ambient air, now and then a few soft words
about my own splay footed country. Real representation when the place