LAST DITCH OF DEMOCRACY - Majority Rights

Well, his namesake and 84th generation or whatever, descendant points
out that even in the time of Queen Elisabeth the Earl of Oxford was
falling. He was handing over his rents to some shyster in return for a
fixed income. Ten thousand, or whatever it was, a year and then the
shyster had leave to squeeze what he could out of the peasants and
yeomen, out of the men working the land.
Decline of the feudal system. Ole F.M. Ford used to talk about that.
Liberty is not a right but a duty. [To] own property, not a right but a
duty. I wonder how long it is going to take you to learn that. Rot and
laziness cutting in under, too lazy to FUNCTION as lords and
proprietors, the nobility sold out to the shysters.
In my 12 years in London, how many people did I meet (meeting as you
might say the flower of the writing class in your island), how many
people did I meet who had read their own history, how many who had
read Anthony Trollope ? It was said as extenuation of Professor
Saintsbury, “at any rate he recognized the merit of Trollope.” Owning
property not a right but a duty. That statement is rather emphatic. Even
Robespierre defined ownership of property, putting a limit on what the
owner has right to. That being so, you play round with Bolshevism,
thinking you will get OUT of a duty ? Is that it ? Or is it just chickenheaded
on your part ? This pinkness at afternoon tea parties.
People from East Europe, who have been over NEXT to Bolshevised
countries, see different.
People that have been up against Red Bolshevism financed by Schiff in
New York and Rothschild in London, see different.
If you wait too long, you may see. So far I have never met any English
who believed in the abolition of personal ownership.
I see you have lost the habit of witan, the witenagemot and the town
meeting. If you don’t grow or find a leader, you may have to wait for