LAST DITCH OF DEMOCRACY - Majority Rights

And dear ole Bill Woodward does NOT give you clearly the answer. He
is not stallin’, at least I don’t think so, but some things escape him, or
remain in penumbra, probably his own penumbra. For example, he
notices that in the Quincy Adams-Jackson campaign a change came over
American political method. For the first time there was a wild outbreak
of vituperation in the press: wild slanders against both of the candidates
— —.
Shall we say that something had bust? TWO candidates, Quincy Adams
and Jackson, who did not belong to the banks. Of course John Quincy
Adams might not have disturbed ’em, but he was so gol’ thunderin’
honest, and his father had SO seen thru the bank swindle.
I don’t mean that that is all of the story. And let’s not get lost in
retrospect. I tell you. FIRST, you can not understand American history
without digging down into the problem of debt and usury. Up to now no
American history has been written. Takin’ due count of the personnel
and the component of Jewry. Brooks Adams seeing that the Kike
triumphed in England, after Waterloo, and Overholser givin’ you the
clue (along with Col. Lindbergh’s papa)—the CLUE to the betrayal of
the American nation, the American Government, the American system in
1863, the sellout to Rothschild.
But Brooks Adams havin’ his limitation, at least the exposition in the
two volumes mentioned, has the limitation of dealing with wars and the
decline of empires—wars from economic competition. BUT down under
that, if the thing for you to study if you be lookin’ forward, is the
production system. Possibly about to be reinforced ON the U.S.A., as
consequence of the squalor of Knox, the ignorance of the governing
oligarchy. You may be too dumb to do it until you are forced. Seiff’s
embargo was a protective measure.
On a basis of autarchy and collaboration a peaceful world can arise. And
on NO other basis. The mercantilist system, mercantilist disposition, or