LAST DITCH OF DEMOCRACY - Majority Rights

How unlike the Roosevelt technique of raising hysteria, both for
personal and national use. In fact Quisling advocated autarchy, rather
than GRABarchy. Autarchy for Norway, and co-operation BY Norway
and foreign states. He saw Czechoslovakia bucked by international Jews.
He saw the Brito-yitto attempt to encircle Germany was provocative of
unpleasant tension. AND he observed the GE-O-GRaphic position of his
own country in case of Germano-Russian unpleasantness. “Norway, the
cross-roads between Russia, Germany and England.”
BUT he did NOT turn against England, as the British Jews would have
wished him to. He saw a RUSSIAN attempt to use Norway in a flank
attack on Germany AND on England, and advocated a union of Norway
with ENGLAND and Germany. A nordic world federation. Why do WE
in Italy mention this?
Quisling was not pro-Mussolini, the Axis was not yet in being. Contrary
to the Edens and Churchills WE in ITALY do not believe that continual
lies about everyone will help to a new and better world order.
QUISLING considered that peace between England and Germany was
vital to Norway. Therefore the Beaverbrook and hog press have for the
past four years denounced him as a traitor to Norway. Which is what we
expect from Lord Beaverbrook, Sieff, and the Astors, and why the
prestige of the British press has during the past years notably declined
on the continent of Europe, in Asia and in South America, though
apparently NOT in the Morgenthau circle.
To Quisling, “peace and conciliation between Germany and England”
was the one way in which Norway could escape from war and chaos.
With no tenderness for the Latins, Quisling went beyond this
conciliation of Germany and England and wanted a Nordic federation
containing these two great powers, plus the Scandinavian countries, plus
Holland and Flanders.