LAST DITCH OF DEMOCRACY - Majority Rights

forward, I mean when he spoke of economic aggression. How do you
prevent economic aggression INSIDE a nation? If you can’t prevent it
inside a nation, how do you expect to prevent it on the world base? How
do you expect to prevent it internationally if you can not prevent it
internally inside the territory already squashed and defiled by the
plutocracy, by the usury system, by the rump end of the mercantilist
system, which has been diseased and worm eaten by the cancer of usury
(at 60 PER cent) and by the wheeze of varying the purchasing power of
the government money, at the airy whim of the kikes and financiers?
And if you won’t, or if a given gang of profiteers, sometimes called
politicians, WILL not even try to prevent it INSIDE their own countries,
how the Sam Hill do you expect the rest of the world to expect ’em to do
anything about preventing it OUTSIDE the borders of their own
oppressed and unhappy countries?
London slums and the rest of it, as proofs of Churchill’s misanthropy, of
his contempt for ALL social justice, his loathing of the ideas of justice or
equity. Of the three murderers, Churchill, Roosevelt, and Stalin,
conscious or unconscious, Stalin is the more open. I think he has never
tried to deny his hand in mass murders, assassinations, etc. He would
argue that it is just part of his business. Roosevelt would try to say that a
murder today is committed solely in the hope of preventing murder by
his great grand children’s nephews. Mr. Churchill who is an arrant
coward and clever scene shifter has never faced Mencius’ question: Is
there any difference between killing a man with a sword, and killing him
with a system of government? Hence the pink popularity of Bolshevik
propaganda amongst Lord Prof. Keynes’ students in Cambridge,
England, the seat of hermaphroditic aesthetics.
Parts of the world prefer LOCAL control, of their own money power and
credit. It may be deplorable (in the eyes of Wall Street and Washington)
that such aspirations toward personal and national liberty still persist, but
so is it. Some people, some nations, prefer their own administration, to
that of Baruch and Lemanthau and the Sassoon, and the problem is: how