14.06.2013 Views

LAST DITCH OF DEMOCRACY - Majority Rights

LAST DITCH OF DEMOCRACY - Majority Rights

LAST DITCH OF DEMOCRACY - Majority Rights

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

een a serious character SOONER, he would have used his enormous<br />

printing space for the reprint of the thought of the American founders,<br />

Adams, Jefferson, Van Buren, and the distribution of the works of the<br />

Adams descendents. BUT he omitted it. And I don’t ’spose he listens in<br />

to Rome radio. So somebody better tell him.<br />

Twenty years ago Stalin was talkin’ about self-criticisms within the<br />

proletarian parties, their education and instruction on the basis of their<br />

own mistakes. The proletariat, wrote Mr. Stalin, can not retain power if<br />

it does not possess adequate educated administrative cadres, ready for<br />

and capable of organizing the administration of the country. It’s the<br />

question of the advance with seven-league strides to raise the cultural<br />

level that gives one pause. Instead of educatin’ and teachin’ the party<br />

true revolutionary tactics from a study of its own mistakes, we find a<br />

studied evasion of thorny questions, which are glossed over and veiled.<br />

“Left wing communism, and infantile discord,” the words are not mine,<br />

but Lenin’s.<br />

Mr. Stalin said in regard to slogans and resolutions that it was enough to<br />

recall the history of the famous watchword “war against war,” to realize<br />

the utter falsity and rottenness of the political processes of these parties<br />

which veil, etc. There really seems to have been little doubt as to Stalin’s<br />

direction in 1922. His mind appears to have been remarkably clear.<br />

The main query to be raised at this moment, when Mr. Stalin is<br />

undoubtedly as victorious INSIDE the U.S. and Britain, as U.S.<br />

particular interests are being in absorbing the flesh pots of Empire,<br />

(British empire first), the main query is as to the nature and direction of<br />

the evolution of revolution in the United States. I know it is exceedingly<br />

difficult to get a general idea into, let us say, Co. McCormick’s head or<br />

Hamilton Fish’s. Do we move toward REVOLUTION, as from man<br />

toward the amoeba, or do we move, or even desire to move toward an<br />

integration of the individual AS component of the general social scene?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!