LAST DITCH OF DEMOCRACY - Majority Rights

NO, not even that, he wants the right to USE the tools of his craft.
Bolshevism has never by program denied this to him.
I should never go and get scragged on a theoretical issue as to whether
farmers should KOLKHOZ, or own homestead. I believe that in general
experience, the latter has better results on production. But it is NOT a
principle. It is empiric observation.
If Churchill had accepted Bolshie DOGMA, one might not think him a
traitor. But he has NOT. At least no BBC stooge has claimed that for
him. What even a pink might query is the practical executive capacity of
Moscow in WORKING the communist system. One has read reports to
the effect that a hitch now and again occurs among the angels of the
Soviet paradise. As realist one wonders whether a judaic bureaucracy on
the Dimitrov system, with Dimitrov and Co. running it, is the most
desirable regime for Finland, Denmark, Rumania, Switzerland,
Warwick, Kent, and the Midlands.
World revolution, with LOCAL executive autochthonous is one thing,
world revolution with a strictly Jewish and Moscovite control is another.
It is England’s betrayal of SELF determination that ought to lie on the
English conscience. Your alliance with Adam Zad.
#82 (May 4, 1943) U.S.(C40)
ROMANCE
Just why the campus Communist, the starry eyed idealist Communist, or
realist Communist or Bill Bullit millionaire Communard, should suppose
that Stalin is still leadin’ a world revolution instead of playing power
politics on the old Romanoff model; well, I leave it to you.
Back before the American young stopped reading Tennyson’s Idylls of
the King, or the Morte d’ Arthur, or The Tristan of Beroul, or M. Hillaire