14.06.2013 Views

LAST DITCH OF DEMOCRACY - Majority Rights

LAST DITCH OF DEMOCRACY - Majority Rights

LAST DITCH OF DEMOCRACY - Majority Rights

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

eh; on your part. You meant, of course, MEANT to set the two great<br />

powers at each other’s throats once again and to come in when both<br />

were exhausted. Might overdo it? Might find yourselves in the grip of<br />

the new pincers? It used to be felt that the Americans would get more<br />

soaviter in modo, than the Germans fortiter in re. Half time score seems<br />

to be to American advantage. Not my place as a Yank to complain of the<br />

material advantages gained by American policy. And yet I deplore the<br />

American policy. NOT because it was soaviter in modo, with YOU. And<br />

I do NOT hold you responsible for it, save insofar as you tolerated the<br />

precedent and falsifications.<br />

On theory, on grounds of program, I have perhaps said a few words for<br />

Lenin. When asked to criticize the Kharkov Congress, I did so with<br />

perfect good will. I went on writing in Communist papers. I have quoted<br />

Stalin’s “Foundations of Leninism” over this radio. Not of course when<br />

expounding fascist doctrine. Merely from personal sympathy with<br />

various points made in 1922 by Joseph Stalin. In 1926 or whenever I got<br />

the brochure, it was not with Stalin’s Bolshevism but with his<br />

backsliding that I should have quarreled. I disliked a year ago to see<br />

Stalin repeating the Czarist error, and sacrificing millions of Russians IN<br />

THE CAUSE of the usurers. The NON-slavic usurers. In fact one never<br />

does hear of Russian money lenders. I suppose Russians must have had<br />

jobs in banks, now and again, but one doesn’t hear much of it.<br />

I don’t know that I should have any difficulties about accepting a REAL<br />

Bolshevik program. The artist does not, and never [has] been part of the<br />

bourgeoisie. I object to a pretended attack on captial, on usurocracy, that<br />

degenerates into a mere attack upon property and leaves the money<br />

lender, the pawnbroker, setting pretty and in full control of the<br />

exploitation system, milking the producer.<br />

Producers of the world, unite. All right by me. The artist don’t need to<br />

own property. Usually bores him. What he wants is to own his tools.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!