LAST DITCH OF DEMOCRACY - Majority Rights

just price and the homestead, or is it just another fake opposition set up
and financed by the financiers? Longnosed or shortnosed?
There is manifestly no freedom without economic freedom. Freedom to
keep out of debt. In 1936 a discussion of Simonds and Emery’s “The
Price of Peace” appeared in London and contained a division of nations
which seems to me inadequate. The first group, according to the
criticisms of Simonds and Emery, consisted of status-quo powers, such
as France and England, who were “naturally satisfied with their
enormous possessions” and desired to see no change.
The second group consisted of revisionist powers: dissatisfied powers,
Germany, Japan, and Italy, who wanted the world to move. Otherwise
their standards of living would sink, and national existence shrivel. You
will at once think of a third set of powers, namely, Roosevelt’s Hebrew
Republic, and Stalin’s Russia, both possessed of vast wealth. No need to
expand their borders, having vast need of clean sane and decent
distribution INSIDE those borders. But rich beyond the dreams of
anything but Rothschildean greed, and flagrantly determined to expand,
grab and pervade.
And England certainly has entered some sort of plot, or gang, to betray
Eastern Europe, to betray pretty much all of European civilization. There
is no truce with Adam Zad, the bear that walks like a man. That on the
one hand, and W. Manning Dacey, in the Observer for January 10,
telling you and the world that the profits of the Big Five (that is
BANKS), the chief banks of your country, are for the first time above the
1929 level. Cui bono, whom doth it profit?
For gold I arm their hands
And for gold I buy their lands
and for gold I sell their enemies the yield
Their nearest fees may purchase, or their furthest
friends may lease.