LAST DITCH OF DEMOCRACY - Majority Rights

Rothschild, and on the subject of loan capital, and international lending,
and the Hebraic or semitic or kike elements in your economics and
politics.
Such, for example as the patronymics of some of your peers; I mean the
names that they started life with, or that their parents started in life with.
AND the relation of your M.P.’s and governing class TO various
financial establishments. Which sometimes have offices both in New
York and in London, or chronologically speaking with regard to
chronological sequence; whose business during the course of eh-hm, the
last couple of centuries has spread from London westward, as the
Sassoons’ has in our time.
Now we Americans, when we hear of The Economist and Mr. Crowther,
and Mr. Einzig, are apt to think of Einzig as a Jew, and of Mr. Crowther
as a servant of Jewry, and The Economist as a Rothschild paper, NOT as
a paper owned by a clean Englishman, or by an Englishman at all.
Perhaps a more definite use of terminology would help Mr. Crowther,
Einzig, and the other members of The Economist staff in establishing a
clearer understanding between themselves and the American public. Of
course, their understanding with Morgenthau, Ben Cohen, Frankfurter,
Roosevelt, Mrs. Hull’s Husband, Lady Halifax’s husband, Mrs. Perkins,
née Rabinovitch or something equally Oriental is or WAS perfectly
clear. But several Americans would regard that rather as an agreement
between a set of kikes in London, and a set of sheenies on the other side
of the fish pond.
Of that understanding, i.e., the understanding between various sets of
international yidds, doing business simultaneously from various
busnisch addresses located in different world capitals, the no longer in
ALL the world capitals, there has never been any doubt. That is, not for
the past 20 years, or past 40 years, save in uninformed circles. It is the
increasingly well lit nature of the understanding between the Jews who
run Russia and the Jews now pullulating in positions of power in