14.06.2013 Views

LAST DITCH OF DEMOCRACY - Majority Rights

LAST DITCH OF DEMOCRACY - Majority Rights

LAST DITCH OF DEMOCRACY - Majority Rights

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Asquith lift up her wail in protest? Will she rush out to tell you of the<br />

benefits you have reaped from the Rothschilds? What of it?<br />

She was telling us a few weeks ago, over the air, warmed to the B.B.C.<br />

temperature, that she had known eleven P.M.’s, from Gladstone—“Say<br />

your prayers, Margot”—down to the present. It is a great pity she didn’t<br />

tell us what the OTHER ten thought of the present one, the present P.<br />

[M.] That would have made snappy hearing. With a few quotes from<br />

William Watson.<br />

However, as you can’t bring the Duke of Wellington to the microphone,<br />

I suppose you have to do something. Now speaking of Jews, and the<br />

problem. The Jewish problem, which The Economist does NOT<br />

elucidate, because it belongs to the Jews, that is to Rothschild, and its<br />

editors serve their owners. The Economist has discovered officially that<br />

some Americans do not see eye to eye with the Anglo-Jews. Is it a pity?<br />

I think it is not a pity. The Jews have ruin’d every country they have got<br />

hold of. The Jews have worked out a system, very neat system, for the<br />

ruin of the rest of mankind, one nation after another. Now many<br />

Americans are ignorant of this fact, and The Economist does its<br />

periodical bit to maintain that ignorance; but YOU like the ignorance. I<br />

do not think the normal American likes his ignorance. That may produce<br />

a fundamental dichotomy.<br />

The Economist and its affiliated papers; that is nine-tenths of your press<br />

wishes to uphold the present ignorance. That is very English, I mean that<br />

is what the American means by a newspaper policy being English. A<br />

more piercing eye might consider that it is, in a certain sense, anti-<br />

English. The Countess of Oxford was once an admirer of the<br />

Rothschilds, perhaps she still is. When last at the microphone, she said<br />

nothing about it. I don’t know that the American people are very much<br />

interested in her views on finance and government; but they would be<br />

more likely to see eye to eye with some of the submerged factions in<br />

England if more people said something clearer on the subject of the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!