LAST DITCH OF DEMOCRACY - Majority Rights

HENCE his alliance with the bishops of England, and the stockbrokers
and the lenders of money, who first lend for war and then lend for
reparation.
The words for Englishmen and Americans is “Know thyself and thine
enemy.” These outrage raids are NOT made to win war, they are made to
stave off a possible or a durable peace, to sow hate, as of course are the
constant exhortations to riot and assassination which are the stock and
trade of the BBC radio in foreign transmissions, which contrast with the
soft soap and chocolate of their “love us all” howls in English.
That is my comment. Let me return to Byrne’s article. Quote:
The issue which has swept down the centuries and which will have to
be fought sooner or later, is the people versus the Banks.
That was the Lord Chief Justice of England in 1875. And a further item
from Byrne’s compendium: “During the 20-year period prior to 1938
some twenty million persons perished in Russia.… Wholesale execution,
periodic liquidation.” That refers to YOUR ally. Perhaps Ullstein,
Churchill, and Eden will offer an emendment to these Russian figures?
By way of contrast, (and the Social Crediter assures us its facts are
mainly from Jewish sources, the Jewish encyclopedia, etc.) correct me if
I err, Edward I, determined to solve the Jewish question as it existed in
England and in the Statutum de Judaismo, forbade the Jews to lend on
interest, and granted them permission to engage in commerce and
handicrafts and even to take farms for a period. Some resorted to
highway robbery and a considerable number appear to have resorted to
clipping the coin, as a means of securing a precarious existence.
As a consequence in 1278 the whole of English Jewry was imprisoned
and in 1290 finally expelled. Many settled in the ghetto of Paris. As to
whether Edward the 1st was interested in the welfare of England, we
must leave Mr. Ullstein to decide for you, as you seem averse [to]