LAST DITCH OF DEMOCRACY - Majority Rights

As to the really good historical, reconstructions. NO one despises your
Wilberforces, BUT they have been dead for some time. Their modern
equivalents are NOT on the BBC. NOR are they respected in England to
the point of giving them any power. Sierra Leone does not excuse
Smuts, nor the DEBeers, nor the exploitation of English colonists IN
Africa, by a government, local, colonial entirely in the hands of the
kikes.
The example of France, the example of Poland, apparently taught
England nothing. The weekly “Truth” nibbles at an edge, corruption of
France, a by-word, but meant nothing. La vie de Bohème, romanticized.
You make normal conditions, family, etc., impossible BY economic
pressure, and THEN preach, is no use.
The ROMANCE of La Bohème was that a few individuals of high
sensibility are forced into poverty. IN those impossible conditions, the
fineness still persists, or the consumptive simulacrum of refinement, not
from desire toward eccentricity but they wear picturesque clothes,
because these are the only clothes they can get, or what chance has
thrown them. Then all that is falsified, vide W. Lewis’ continual harping
on the APing of la Bohème by the rich. Also the artists “dare” wear ’em,
those clothes, because no clerk in an office, no office boy (remaining
office boy till age of 40 or 60) would be allowed to wear ’em.
The CONtrast of the refinement with the need gives the romantic
formula but does NOT make the accidents of la Bohème a NORM of
life, as which the false romanticism set it up.
Naturally, if there were no bait, fish wouldn’t bite. Drugs, advertised
alcohol, spirits where there is no nutritive wine. Plenty of preaching but
no potentialization. Ridicule of the middle class as bourgeoisie, etc. all
fits in, boredom exploited. Attitude that [it is] “all part of the game”
whenever one gets to bedrock re the vice of usury, snarl from the