LAST DITCH OF DEMOCRACY - Majority Rights

Kumrad Maisky’s FACE, like the hindend of a pig, for example. WHY
does England suppose that Kumrad Maisky will hesitate any longer
about bumping off George VI and Elizabeth, than his pals did about
killin’ the Czar, with Temple of Canterbury sayin’ the blessin’? No,
Temple is a prize comic, possibly Lang WOULD have pronounced an
Episcopal benediction? Temple don’t, I think, mean any harm, just fat
headed.
Rhetoric about “our representatives in Parliament” is NOT the point.
The point is your Parliament does NOT represent you. That is the
syndicalist complaint against Parliaments in the old rotten borough or
disguised rotten bank-borough form.
Every CONstructive measure proposed to camouflage the iniquity of
your usuries is a slavish copy of the corporate state.
BUT without the corporate structure, just patchin’, and NOT hitting for
the main evil. Money is admitted by at least one B.B.C. yapper to be a
financial label. But interest? When does that occur properly? And WHO
fixes the label, and in whose interests? And IS there a Jewish problem?
Perhaps, along with Carlyle’s love for his wife, and the fine old husky
sailor voices telling of the Chesapeake and the Leopard, there might be a
historic sketch of the Jews and Noll Crummwell, and a FEW probes into
the WHY of the present struggle, and the REFUSALS to cooperate with
the civilized world, and the hook-up with Russia.
Does the Bolshevic government stand for the best English traditions:
free speech, and no taxation without representation?
Fat lot of representation your tax payers have had in this budget. Though
I dare say they have been by now so hog swoggled by propaganda,
appeals to their finest feeling, that they are ready to murder their children
and grandmas in the cause of 60% on real deposits. And a perfect fury of
abuse and hysteria when some Frenchman opens a book of geography