LAST DITCH OF DEMOCRACY - Majority Rights

mankind.” That is true enough, but it ain’t reduced the moral ideal to
ABSOLUTE impotence. This is what was worrying Butler; but he
hadn’t got down to bed rock. He said there was a time, back apparently
when Mark Hanna was running the United State of America, when the
moral ideal was to all appearances gainin’ ground.
Of course if by that he means that some empires were GAINING
territory, he might have said so, only he didn’t. Ole Nicholas puts the
rise of the triumph, real or apparent, the IDEAL, from the McKinley to
the Wealsohn administration.
Note of HOpe and progress.
In 1910, the American Congress was unanimous for the moral principle
(so long as no questions were asked about the privileges of the usury
central). Nic complains that the moral ideal has disappeared in all that
has to do with international relations.
Which shows the state of DEEP ignorance in the WORLD; as distinct
from Nicholas Butler’s circle or pot.
And lookin’ at dates, he must have been blurrin’ this blurb the same
week that a Chinaman, not of Wang Ching Wei’s party, but of Chiang
Kai-shek’s party, and FAITHFUL to Chiang, saying what Hitler’s justice
in scuttling international affairs was such that the Chinese of the ANTI-
JAP, anti-Wang party might accept Hitler’s arbitrage.
Mr. Butler then seems to fall into incoherence. He talks of a PLEDGE
as something to be kept; what price, England, Churchill, and Roosevelt ?
He objects to having the savings of generations swept away; he asks
what has become of the influence of and guidance of the great religions;
Christian, Mosel, HEBREW, and Buddhist, and begorrah, of Plato,
Aristotle, St. Augustine, St. Thomas Aquinas, leaving out St. Ambrose
and St. Antonio da Firenze, and graciously waivin’ a hand to the captains
of the mind, Spanish, Italian, French, English, German. And of course