LAST DITCH OF DEMOCRACY - Majority Rights

Precarious, in the common sense, I’ll say it will be risky. Just as RISKY
as Germany’s was at Versailles. With this difference—that the next
peace won’t be made by a pair of kikes, one at each side of the table, or
standing behind the stuffed shirts who represent ’em in front of the
public.
And the basic aim of the peace will not be Versailles’ basic aim. Namely,
to prepare the next war. That’s what Versailles was aimed at, with its
daggers and cross lines, its Skodas, its synthetic states. Its gun factories
run with Jew money, run on loans, based on money sweated out of the
Aryan peoples, sweated out of the farm laborers and industrial workin’
men. Stuck in positions of danger. The next peace will not be based on
international lending. Get that for one. And England will certainly have
nothing what bloody ever to say about what its terms are. Neither I think
will simple hearted Joe Stalin, NOT wholly trusted by the kikery which
is his master.
WHY have you got where you are, and where are you? YOU are down
under the filth and dung of humanity. You are down under Maisky and
Litvinoff, and if human degradation can show anything lower, go fetch
it.
LOOK at your masters’ faces! How did you get there, and why is
Bartlett in a position to say so? Bartlett is one of the noises, as you will
say, not a bad fellow, has many pleasant intentions.
CAN HE AFFECT ’em? He can not. He is a journalist, under the rump
of the usury system. Under the rump of the usury system, certain pimps
rise into prominence. I noted it first in the economic brothel. Pigou,
every time Asquith government wanted a swindle put over, Pigou was
expected to fix up the SCIENCE of economics to suit it. A few figures, a
few statistical tables. He waren’t quite lively enough, so a confidence
man named Keynes was invented.