LAST DITCH OF DEMOCRACY - Majority Rights

Now I ask Social Creditors if anyone of ’em except Major Douglas gave
in the old days—the dim and distant 20s or the almost as dim 1830 and
35s—ANY thought as to the sort of paralysis that allus seemed to creep
into the Social Credit movement, about as soon as it got near action.
I have told you of Senator Cutting’s hope, and his disappointment.
Aberhart may for all I know still rule in Calgarry, like Brian Duff in
— —still. The jewbrew and rabbinical stations do NOT stress either
present or past of Alberta province.
Mebbe no one has told ’em you OUGHT, you really ought NOT to ask
the pliant public to put a stamp on its stamp scrip once a WEEK. Lord
knows I have tried in my time to stop a fairly wide set of foolishnesses
on [the] part of people who LACK historic perspective, or who failed to
grasp the inner workin’s of economic mechanisms, and the relations
between one expression of monetary honesty and another.
I am not concerned with the merits of particular bills, I am not
concerned with the injected paralysis that has stopped any and all bills
having economic basis in honesty since 1873, or say since 1863, gettin’
back to the start of the present phase of the unending swindle. Is that
paralysis due to the Talmud ? Or to the spieir [?] whereof the Talmud is
the most complete (and dirty) and thorough verbal manifestation extant?
There is no doubt that C.H. Douglas began to notice some years ago that
certain elements, call ’em elements, seemed to penetrate into the works
of the Social Creditors’ movement just about the time it seemed to be
about to be real. In fact his writin’s during the three years precedin’ Mr.
Churchill’s new war were largely spent in lookin’ for the source of these
penetrations, these injections of paralysis. He left off his a plus b, or left
it in the background and got right out with Henry Ford in
IDENTIFYIN’ the Hebrews as a possible source of infection. And the
circulatability of his publications got lower and lower.