14.06.2013 Views

PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY

PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY

PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

272 H. PLATTNER ET AL»<br />

activity (Fig. 5) at the preformed exocytotic fusion sites of paramecia<br />

(P 1 a 11 n e r et al. 1978). This activity was absent from exocytotically<br />

inactive mutations devoid of "rosettes" and simultaneously of "connecting<br />

material" (P 1 a 11 n e r et al. 1980); see Table 1. Some differences<br />

were also found biochemically, when pellicles were isolated from exocytosis-capable<br />

and -incapable strains and assayed by spectral photometric<br />

tests for their Ca 2+ -ATPase activity (B i 1 i n s k i et al. 1981 b).<br />

All this opens up several possibilities: The ATPase could represent<br />

a Ca 2 +-pump (keeping the local Ca 2+ concentration low and thus avoiding<br />

membrane fusion in the untriggered state; see also B e i s s o n<br />

et al. 1980), a site of protein phosphorylation (as in other exocytotic<br />

systems, like synaptosomes), a Ca 2+ -channel (if combined with a pump,<br />

as in other systems, like sarcoplasmic reticulum) or it could indicate<br />

the presence of contractile elements of the actomyosin type. Since exocytosis<br />

occurs in response to ATPase inhibitors (Matt et al. 1980),<br />

the pump function appears possible, although we have no definite proof<br />

for this assumption. Protein phosphorylation would also be compatible<br />

with our cytochemical findings (Plattner et al. 1977, 1980) but this<br />

interpretation would still require biochemical confirmation. A Ca 2+ channel<br />

function was inferred by Satir and Oberg (1978) but it was<br />

shown later, that an alternative interpretation of their results would<br />

be possible (Matt et al. 1980), although their concept could be correct.<br />

As to contractile elements, it was shown by immunofluorescence (rabbitanti<br />

(Paramecium) actin IgG) and affinity fluorescence (DNase I, heavy<br />

meromyosin) labeling (Tiggemann and Plattner 1981) as well<br />

as by immuno-electron microscopic methods (Tiggemann et al.<br />

1981) that the potential fusion sites proper, i.e., the "connecting material"<br />

regions, are devoid of actin (Plattner et al. 1982; see Fig. 6).<br />

This questions any direct interference of actin (or microfilaments,<br />

respectively) in the membrane fusion process — in opposition to earlier<br />

assumptions along these lines (Poste and Allisson 1973).<br />

In conclusion we assume that our cytochemical findings could indicate<br />

most likely the local presence of a Ca 2+ -dependent ATP-splitting<br />

activity, possibly combined with a Ca 2 +-transport function (pump and<br />

channel?). "Rosettes" and "connecting material" occur always together<br />

and only in exocytosis-capable Paramecium strains. This could be seen<br />

as being relevant for the structural assembly of the "rosette" MIP (which<br />

would be held together by the apposed "connecting material") and probably<br />

as being also functionally relevant, e.g., as a combined enzymeactivator<br />

type system (see discussion in Plattner et al. 1980). As<br />

to the latter possibility it would be rewarding to test for the presence<br />

of calmodulin or related proteins within the structural component with<br />

http://rcin.org.pl

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!