14.06.2013 Views

PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY

PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY

PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

259<br />

pattern; they do confirm our judgement that all the species studied<br />

are very far from a common ancestor.<br />

As we have seen, some nucleic molecules are very stable, while<br />

others are relatively labile. The same observation can be made for<br />

proteins. An example of a very unstable protein, at least unstable for<br />

the attribute examined, is the immobilization antigen. Tetrahymenas are<br />

readily immobilized by antisera prepared against them (Margolin<br />

et al. 1959), and the sensitive immobilization test has facilitated considerable<br />

work on the genetics and regulation of molecules involved<br />

(Doerder 1979). Thus far, antisera prepared against one species of<br />

the T. pyriformis complex have never been found to immobilize strains<br />

of another species, even at much higher concentrations (N a n n e y,<br />

unpublished, Grass, unpublished). Moreover, antisera prepared against<br />

whole cells usually form no sharp bands in heterologous agar diffusion<br />

tests. The antigenic properties of the immobilization antigens, and of<br />

most other major antigenic molecules, are too unstable to provide estimates<br />

of evolutionary distances within the complex.<br />

Very much the same sense of large but unmeasurable molecular distances<br />

comes from the electrophoretic analysis of certain enzymes. The<br />

esterase enzymes, like the mitochondrial DNAs, are (notoriously variable<br />

in most organisms and useful chiefly in discriminating among closely<br />

related species. Allen and Weremiuk (1971) carried out a survey<br />

of the esterases in a number of species of the T. pyriformis complex,<br />

attempting to describe not only their electrophoretic properties but<br />

their specificities. Starting with T. thermophila, they defined three classes<br />

of esterases (Table 10) on the basis of their substrates and inhibitors.<br />

Table 10<br />

Classes of esterases demonstrable in Tetrahymena species . Enzymes noted in parentheses<br />

not observed in all strains examined<br />

Species Esterase-1 Esterase-2 Esterase-3 Summary<br />

T. thermophila (1) + + + + + +<br />

T. americanis (2) + + + + +<br />

T. borealis (3) + - + + - +<br />

T. hegewischi (5) - - + 4-<br />

T. canadensis (7) + + + + + +<br />

^ • < 6 — — —<br />

><br />

T. pigmentosa ^ — — —<br />

T. tropicalis (9) + + + + + +<br />

T. hyperangularis (10) - - —<br />

T. australis (11) - + + - +<br />

T. capricornis (12) - -f + - + +<br />

Allen and Weremiuk (1971).<br />

http://rcin.org.pl

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!