14.06.2013 Views

PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY

PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY

PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

210<br />

those times PROTOZOA were regarded as unicellular eukaryotic organisms<br />

which gave rise to METAZOA. The origin of the multicellular<br />

animals was explained differently by various authors, starting with<br />

the gastrea theory of E. H a e c k e 1. However, the most common of<br />

the theories proposed through the years was that METAZOA originated<br />

from the unicellular eukaryotes, PROTOZOA.<br />

Origins of the protozoan taxa were considered first in the pioneering<br />

works of Butschli (1884, 1885, 1887, 1889). The idea of a monophyletic<br />

origin of the PROTOZOA was the basis of all theories on their<br />

evolution. Either the naked amebae or the flagellates were considered<br />

by different workers as the ancestors of all other eukaryotic groups,<br />

including PROTOZOA.<br />

During the last two decades, the originally simple scheme has undergone<br />

numerous drastic changes. The great progress in biology, especially<br />

in the fields of electron microscopy, molecular biology, and biochemistry,<br />

necessitated major revisions of theories previously believed<br />

to be unassailable. Among the questions which have arisen as a result<br />

of recent developments is whether the PROTOZOA constitute a natural<br />

group. This question is associated with the concept of the origin of<br />

eukaryotes and with that of their mono- vs polyphyletic evolution.<br />

The elucidation of these problems in a manner which would take<br />

into account the vast body of information available in published works<br />

would necessitate writing an entire book. Such an approach is, of course,<br />

beyond the scope of my short presentation. This presentation is intended<br />

merely to open a discussion. Because of time limitations, some<br />

of the opinions I shall express cannot be illustrated by supporting factual<br />

evidence; therefore, my assertions may sound somewhat dogmatic.<br />

The first problem I shall address pertains to the kinds of relationships<br />

existing between Prokaryota and Eukaryota. The question is whether<br />

these two main forms of organisms evolved independently of each<br />

other or if the latter found their origin in the former.<br />

Both of the aforementioned views find adherents among scientists;<br />

I am inclined to support the concept of prokaryote ancestry of the eukaryotes.<br />

Indeed, although there exist obvious differences between the<br />

two groups of organisms, their most important vital processes are essentially<br />

the same. Among the processes shared by the pro- and eukaryotes<br />

are: storage, replication, transcription, and translation of hereditary<br />

information by DNA and RNA. The common origin of Pro- and<br />

Eukaryota is supported also by their similar batteries of enzymes mediating<br />

various metabolic processes. The results of genetic engineering can<br />

be used as additional evidence in support of the common origin of the<br />

two kinds or organisms, e.g., it is known that some eukaryotic genes<br />

http://rcin.org.pl

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!