14.06.2013 Views

PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY

PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY

PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

198 B. M. HONIGBERG<br />

1. Morphological, especially fine-structural, features are, as indicated<br />

by Prof. Scholtyseck, the principal bases for separation of<br />

the higher protozoan taxa. It is the presence of the apical complex<br />

that helps in placing a newly discovered organism in the phylum API-<br />

COMPLEXA. This structural characteristic can be recognized rather<br />

quickly. On the other hand, finding all stages of a life cycle might take<br />

months, years, or, indeed a lifetime of an investigator;<br />

2. It is now generally accepted that the main, or even the only<br />

structural pattern found among the members of the phylum APICOM-<br />

PLEXA is the one characteristic of the class SPOROZOA Leuckart,<br />

1879, or even of the suborder EIMERI<strong>IN</strong>A Léger, 1911. This limited<br />

view can be seen in the diagrams of the apical complex included in the<br />

majority of the more recent reports. The presence or absence of the<br />

•conoid or the number and position of rhoptries and of subpellicular<br />

microtubules are the features often used for separation of the members<br />

of the phylum under consideration. However, this approach is not rational.<br />

The structural organization may vary far more, e.g., Dermocystidium<br />

marinum or Spiromonas. Yet the presence of a trilaminar pellicle,<br />

or a micropore, or rhoptries etc. can be considered sufficient for inclusion<br />

of an organism among APICOMPLEXA, even though any of these<br />

structures by itself may not constitute sufficient grounds for assigning<br />

a protozoon to SPOROZOA;<br />

3. Dissimilarity in life cycles of organisms having similar structure<br />

does not preclude their assignment to APICOMPLEXA. For example,<br />

until the late 1960's or early 1970's the life cycles of genera such as<br />

Toxoplasma, Sarcocystis, or Besnoitia were considered as distinct from<br />

those typical of SPOROZOA. The more recent fine-structural findings<br />

indicated the need for inclusion of these genera in APICOMPLEXA,<br />

albeit not in SPOROZOA. Subsequent studies of their life cycles showed<br />

that Toxoplasma and the related genera belonged together with Eimeria,<br />

Isospora, and Plasmodium in the order EUCOCCIDIIDA Léger et Dubosq,<br />

1910; they are considered now as members of the suborder EIMERI<strong>IN</strong>A<br />

Léger, 1911.<br />

According to Dr. Beyer, the situation cited by her for Toxoplasma<br />

may apply also to Dermocystidium (= Perkinsus) marinum, the life cycle<br />

of which is incompletely understood. Thus, it is impossible to include<br />

the latter genus in SPOROZOA. However, the presence of apical structures<br />

in Perkinsus, although strikingly different from those of "typical"<br />

coccidia, provides a sufficient reason for placing this organism in API-<br />

COMPLEXA. Further studies are needed before a definite position in<br />

this phylum is found for the heretofore neglected genus Perkinsus. The<br />

discussant expressed no opinion about placing this genus in L e v i n e's<br />

(1978) class PERK<strong>IN</strong>SEA. (It should be noted here that several of the<br />

http://rcin.org.pl

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!