PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY
PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY
PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
198 B. M. HONIGBERG<br />
1. Morphological, especially fine-structural, features are, as indicated<br />
by Prof. Scholtyseck, the principal bases for separation of<br />
the higher protozoan taxa. It is the presence of the apical complex<br />
that helps in placing a newly discovered organism in the phylum API-<br />
COMPLEXA. This structural characteristic can be recognized rather<br />
quickly. On the other hand, finding all stages of a life cycle might take<br />
months, years, or, indeed a lifetime of an investigator;<br />
2. It is now generally accepted that the main, or even the only<br />
structural pattern found among the members of the phylum APICOM-<br />
PLEXA is the one characteristic of the class SPOROZOA Leuckart,<br />
1879, or even of the suborder EIMERI<strong>IN</strong>A Léger, 1911. This limited<br />
view can be seen in the diagrams of the apical complex included in the<br />
majority of the more recent reports. The presence or absence of the<br />
•conoid or the number and position of rhoptries and of subpellicular<br />
microtubules are the features often used for separation of the members<br />
of the phylum under consideration. However, this approach is not rational.<br />
The structural organization may vary far more, e.g., Dermocystidium<br />
marinum or Spiromonas. Yet the presence of a trilaminar pellicle,<br />
or a micropore, or rhoptries etc. can be considered sufficient for inclusion<br />
of an organism among APICOMPLEXA, even though any of these<br />
structures by itself may not constitute sufficient grounds for assigning<br />
a protozoon to SPOROZOA;<br />
3. Dissimilarity in life cycles of organisms having similar structure<br />
does not preclude their assignment to APICOMPLEXA. For example,<br />
until the late 1960's or early 1970's the life cycles of genera such as<br />
Toxoplasma, Sarcocystis, or Besnoitia were considered as distinct from<br />
those typical of SPOROZOA. The more recent fine-structural findings<br />
indicated the need for inclusion of these genera in APICOMPLEXA,<br />
albeit not in SPOROZOA. Subsequent studies of their life cycles showed<br />
that Toxoplasma and the related genera belonged together with Eimeria,<br />
Isospora, and Plasmodium in the order EUCOCCIDIIDA Léger et Dubosq,<br />
1910; they are considered now as members of the suborder EIMERI<strong>IN</strong>A<br />
Léger, 1911.<br />
According to Dr. Beyer, the situation cited by her for Toxoplasma<br />
may apply also to Dermocystidium (= Perkinsus) marinum, the life cycle<br />
of which is incompletely understood. Thus, it is impossible to include<br />
the latter genus in SPOROZOA. However, the presence of apical structures<br />
in Perkinsus, although strikingly different from those of "typical"<br />
coccidia, provides a sufficient reason for placing this organism in API-<br />
COMPLEXA. Further studies are needed before a definite position in<br />
this phylum is found for the heretofore neglected genus Perkinsus. The<br />
discussant expressed no opinion about placing this genus in L e v i n e's<br />
(1978) class PERK<strong>IN</strong>SEA. (It should be noted here that several of the<br />
http://rcin.org.pl