14.06.2013 Views

PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY

PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY

PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

22<br />

B. M. HONIGBERG<br />

lar rings, micronemes, and a conoid; also, centrioles were seen associated<br />

with dividing nuclei.<br />

Sexual "behavior" is an important characteristic in ascertaining the<br />

taxonomic position of an organism in the subclass COCCIDIA. Therefore,<br />

the elucidation of a presumed sexual phase in the life cycle(s) of<br />

piroplasms is of major importance. Me hi horn et al. (1980) indicated<br />

that the piroplasms have many characteristics in common with the<br />

members of HAEMOSPOR<strong>IN</strong>A and that the two assemblages should be<br />

considered as "sister groups." According to M a 11 m a n (at the present<br />

Congress), however his fine-structural observations of a species of<br />

Babesia cultivated in vitro revealed apparent syngamy of gametes,<br />

a process unlike that typical of HAEMOSPOR<strong>IN</strong>A, but resembling<br />

fertilization described from several ADEL<strong>IN</strong>A. Furthermore, according<br />

to Prof. D e s s e r, the kinetes of the species belonging to the<br />

genera Babesia and Theileria are as similar to the sporokinetes of Karyolysus<br />

spp. as to the ookinetes of HAMEOSPOR<strong>IN</strong>A. The picture is<br />

further confused by the study of Theileria annulata (S c h e i n et al.<br />

1975) in which the sexual reproduction is said to involve anisogamy,<br />

with filariform microgametes. Some workers still doubt the occurrence<br />

of sexual reproduction among the piroplasms.<br />

In light of the available data, Prof. Desser concluded that a definite<br />

commitment on the taxonomic position of the piroplasms among<br />

the APICOMPLEXA should be postponed until the problems outlined<br />

in his presentation have been resolved.<br />

Remarks of the Discussants<br />

Dr. Tamara Beyer and Profs. G a r n h a m and K r y 1 o v made<br />

remarks about APICOMPLEXA.<br />

The following statement was made by Prof. GARNHAM. The two<br />

classification schemes published by the Society of Protozoologists (H on<br />

i g b e r g et al. 1964; L e v i n e et al. 1980) were concerned only with<br />

the higher taxa, down to suborders, but the interrelationships can be<br />

more precisely visualized in the taxa below suborders — the former represents<br />

concepts, the latter actual organisms. In view of this, he proposed<br />

that a special Round Table Discussion be arranged at some future<br />

time, for example at the next Congress.<br />

The "phylum" APICOMPLEXA, divided into three "sub-classes,"<br />

seemed to him natural and fairly neatly to fit into the old term SPO-<br />

ROZOA which we reluctantly abandoned; but electron microscopy has<br />

revolutionized the territory and has necessitated a new look. APICOM-<br />

PLEXA are a unique group in: (a) being obligatorily parasitic and (b)<br />

possessing ultramicroscopic structures at the anterior end and a micro-<br />

http://rcin.org.pl

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!