PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY
PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY
20 B. M. HONIGBERG On phylogenetic grounds, Prof. Scholtyseck suggested a divison of the phylum into two subphyla, SPOROZOA and PIRO- PLASMA. Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of a coccidian merozoite showing the diagnostic finestructural characteristics, (a) longitudinal section of the organism, (b) longitudinal and transverse sections of a micropore, (c) a diagram of a conoid. A — amylopectin, C — conoid, DRH — ductule of rhoptry, ER — endoplasmic reticulum, FI — fibril, GO — Golgi apparatus, IM — inner membrane complex, MI — mitochondrion, MN — micronemes, MP — micropore, MT — miirotuibules, N — nucleus, NE — nuclear envelope, NP — nuclear pore, O — opening, OM — outer membrane, P — polar ring, PE — pellicle, PP — posterior polar ring, Ri, R2 — preconoidal rings, RH — rhqptry In their life cycle the organisms belonging to the former subphylum have an encysted zygote, sporocysts in the gregarines and oocysts in the coccidia. Meiosis and sporogony occur in these stages. Therefore, it would be useful to preserve the historical name SPOROZOA Leuckart, 1879 for this subphylum. Since to date the occurrence of gamogony among piroplasms has not been unequivocally proved, this group should be separated from SPO- ROZOA and placed in a new subphylum PIROPLASMA. http://rcin.org.pl
195 The foregoing subdivisions of APICOMPLEXA reflect Prof. S c h o 1t y s e c k's belief that asexual reproduction, i.e., schizogony (or merogony), represents a secondary development in the course of evolution of the phylum found only in the more advanced intracellular SPORO- ZOA. The more primitive gregarines and coccidia have only the sexual reproductive phase. According to the speaker, if one follows his approach to the taxonomy of APICOMPLEXA, the genus Perkinsus Levine, 1978, the sole member of the class PERKINSEA Levine, 1978, is to be considered not as sporozoan, but as an apicomplexan. On the other hand, the members of the order AGAMOCOCCIDIIDA Levine, 1979 do not belong among COCCIDIA Leuckart, 1879. A different approach to APICOMPLEXA was presented by the second speaker, Prof. DESSER. It was his understanding that the name APICOMPLEXA was created by Levine (1970) to replace the older and generally employed name SPOROZOA which included only the gregarines, coccidia, and piroplasms. In addition to possessing the apical complex, as revealed by electron microscopy, the majority of the species belonging to API- COMPLEXA have life cycles that involve gamogony and sporogony; in most instances they include also merogony. The inclusion of the class PERKINSEA Levine, 1978 among API- COMPLEXA (with the single genus Perkinsus Levine, 1978) in the most recent scheme published by the Society of Protozoologists (Levine et al., 1980) is not justified. Admittedly, the zoospores of this peculiar organism possess certain features which superficially resemble the apical complex. These features might have resulted, however, from convergent evolution of organisms of different ancestry and function in a similar manner to enable the parasites to assume their intracellular location. Moreover, these parasites do not undergo sexual reproduction, sporogony, or merogony. Finally, the zoospores of Perkinsus sp. (which are not sexual stages) are biflagellate (Perkins 1976). For those reasons, he felt that the class Perkinsea should be removed from the APICOM- PLEXA and that the original concept of APICOMPLEXA as the equivalent of SPOROZOA, be retained. Prof. Desser felt that not enough information is available at this time to justify definitive decisions with regard to the affinities of the piroplasms. One must agree with him that much evidence was provided during the Sixth Congress in support of this opinion. One of the lines of evidence was the demonstration by Prof. V i v i e r that Dactylosoma ranarum is an eimeriid coccidian rather than a piroplasm. Intraerythrocytic merozoites of these species have a trilaminate pellicle, po- http://rcin.org.pl
- Page 1 and 2: POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES NENCKI I
- Page 3 and 4: PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY Proceeding
- Page 5 and 6: INTRODUCTORY REMARKS This Part II o
- Page 7 and 8: PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY Proceeding
- Page 9 and 10: 183 In his abstract Mignot (1981) s
- Page 11 and 12: PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG PR
- Page 13 and 14: 187 algae by phycologists (Bourelly
- Page 15 and 16: PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG PR
- Page 17 and 18: PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG PR
- Page 19: PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG PR
- Page 23 and 24: PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG PR
- Page 25 and 26: PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG PR
- Page 27 and 28: PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG PR
- Page 29 and 30: PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG PR
- Page 31 and 32: PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG PR
- Page 33 and 34: PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG PR
- Page 35 and 36: 209 vine et al. 1980), there is no
- Page 37 and 38: PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG PR
- Page 39 and 40: 213 evidence for the assumption of
- Page 41 and 42: REFERENCES 215 Bardele C. F. 1977:
- Page 43 and 44: PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG PR
- Page 45 and 46: PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY Proceeding
- Page 47 and 48: THE TAXONOMIC POSITION OF EVGLENIDA
- Page 49 and 50: PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY Proceeding
- Page 51 and 52: 225 brate cycle in vitro. Further c
- Page 53 and 54: 227 could support the development o
- Page 55 and 56: 229 for the development of methods
- Page 57 and 58: IN VITRO CULTIVATION OF PARASITIC P
- Page 59 and 60: Malaria IN VITRO CULTIVATION OF PAR
- Page 61 and 62: IN VITRO CULTIVATION OF PARASITIC P
- Page 63 and 64: 237 Rai Choudhuri A. N.. Chowdhuri
- Page 65 and 66: PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY Proceeding
- Page 67 and 68: 241 Only those with 9-type 1 fronto
- Page 69 and 70: PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY Proceeding
195<br />
The foregoing subdivisions of APICOMPLEXA reflect Prof. S c h o 1t<br />
y s e c k's belief that asexual reproduction, i.e., schizogony (or merogony),<br />
represents a secondary development in the course of evolution<br />
of the phylum found only in the more advanced intracellular SPORO-<br />
ZOA. The more primitive gregarines and coccidia have only the sexual<br />
reproductive phase.<br />
According to the speaker, if one follows his approach to the taxonomy<br />
of APICOMPLEXA, the genus Perkinsus Levine, 1978, the sole<br />
member of the class PERK<strong>IN</strong>SEA Levine, 1978, is to be considered not<br />
as sporozoan, but as an apicomplexan. On the other hand, the members<br />
of the order AGAMOCOCCIDIIDA Levine, 1979 do not belong among<br />
COCCIDIA Leuckart, 1879.<br />
A different approach to APICOMPLEXA was presented by the second<br />
speaker, Prof. DESSER.<br />
It was his understanding that the name APICOMPLEXA was<br />
created by Levine (1970) to replace the older and generally employed<br />
name SPOROZOA which included only the gregarines, coccidia, and<br />
piroplasms. In addition to possessing the apical complex, as revealed<br />
by electron microscopy, the majority of the species belonging to API-<br />
COMPLEXA have life cycles that involve gamogony and sporogony;<br />
in most instances they include also merogony.<br />
The inclusion of the class PERK<strong>IN</strong>SEA Levine, 1978 among API-<br />
COMPLEXA (with the single genus Perkinsus Levine, 1978) in the most<br />
recent scheme published by the Society of Protozoologists (Levine<br />
et al., 1980) is not justified. Admittedly, the zoospores of this peculiar<br />
organism possess certain features which superficially resemble the apical<br />
complex. These features might have resulted, however, from convergent<br />
evolution of organisms of different ancestry and function in a similar<br />
manner to enable the parasites to assume their intracellular location.<br />
Moreover, these parasites do not undergo sexual reproduction, sporogony,<br />
or merogony. Finally, the zoospores of Perkinsus sp. (which are<br />
not sexual stages) are biflagellate (Perkins 1976). For those reasons,<br />
he felt that the class Perkinsea should be removed from the APICOM-<br />
PLEXA and that the original concept of APICOMPLEXA as the equivalent<br />
of SPOROZOA, be retained.<br />
Prof. Desser felt that not enough information is available at this<br />
time to justify definitive decisions with regard to the affinities of the<br />
piroplasms. One must agree with him that much evidence was provided<br />
during the Sixth Congress in support of this opinion. One of the<br />
lines of evidence was the demonstration by Prof. V i v i e r that Dactylosoma<br />
ranarum is an eimeriid coccidian rather than a piroplasm. Intraerythrocytic<br />
merozoites of these species have a trilaminate pellicle, po-<br />
http://rcin.org.pl