PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY

PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY

14.06.2013 Views

20 B. M. HONIGBERG On phylogenetic grounds, Prof. Scholtyseck suggested a divison of the phylum into two subphyla, SPOROZOA and PIRO- PLASMA. Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of a coccidian merozoite showing the diagnostic finestructural characteristics, (a) longitudinal section of the organism, (b) longitudinal and transverse sections of a micropore, (c) a diagram of a conoid. A — amylopectin, C — conoid, DRH — ductule of rhoptry, ER — endoplasmic reticulum, FI — fibril, GO — Golgi apparatus, IM — inner membrane complex, MI — mitochondrion, MN — micronemes, MP — micropore, MT — miirotuibules, N — nucleus, NE — nuclear envelope, NP — nuclear pore, O — opening, OM — outer membrane, P — polar ring, PE — pellicle, PP — posterior polar ring, Ri, R2 — preconoidal rings, RH — rhqptry In their life cycle the organisms belonging to the former subphylum have an encysted zygote, sporocysts in the gregarines and oocysts in the coccidia. Meiosis and sporogony occur in these stages. Therefore, it would be useful to preserve the historical name SPOROZOA Leuckart, 1879 for this subphylum. Since to date the occurrence of gamogony among piroplasms has not been unequivocally proved, this group should be separated from SPO- ROZOA and placed in a new subphylum PIROPLASMA. http://rcin.org.pl

195 The foregoing subdivisions of APICOMPLEXA reflect Prof. S c h o 1t y s e c k's belief that asexual reproduction, i.e., schizogony (or merogony), represents a secondary development in the course of evolution of the phylum found only in the more advanced intracellular SPORO- ZOA. The more primitive gregarines and coccidia have only the sexual reproductive phase. According to the speaker, if one follows his approach to the taxonomy of APICOMPLEXA, the genus Perkinsus Levine, 1978, the sole member of the class PERKINSEA Levine, 1978, is to be considered not as sporozoan, but as an apicomplexan. On the other hand, the members of the order AGAMOCOCCIDIIDA Levine, 1979 do not belong among COCCIDIA Leuckart, 1879. A different approach to APICOMPLEXA was presented by the second speaker, Prof. DESSER. It was his understanding that the name APICOMPLEXA was created by Levine (1970) to replace the older and generally employed name SPOROZOA which included only the gregarines, coccidia, and piroplasms. In addition to possessing the apical complex, as revealed by electron microscopy, the majority of the species belonging to API- COMPLEXA have life cycles that involve gamogony and sporogony; in most instances they include also merogony. The inclusion of the class PERKINSEA Levine, 1978 among API- COMPLEXA (with the single genus Perkinsus Levine, 1978) in the most recent scheme published by the Society of Protozoologists (Levine et al., 1980) is not justified. Admittedly, the zoospores of this peculiar organism possess certain features which superficially resemble the apical complex. These features might have resulted, however, from convergent evolution of organisms of different ancestry and function in a similar manner to enable the parasites to assume their intracellular location. Moreover, these parasites do not undergo sexual reproduction, sporogony, or merogony. Finally, the zoospores of Perkinsus sp. (which are not sexual stages) are biflagellate (Perkins 1976). For those reasons, he felt that the class Perkinsea should be removed from the APICOM- PLEXA and that the original concept of APICOMPLEXA as the equivalent of SPOROZOA, be retained. Prof. Desser felt that not enough information is available at this time to justify definitive decisions with regard to the affinities of the piroplasms. One must agree with him that much evidence was provided during the Sixth Congress in support of this opinion. One of the lines of evidence was the demonstration by Prof. V i v i e r that Dactylosoma ranarum is an eimeriid coccidian rather than a piroplasm. Intraerythrocytic merozoites of these species have a trilaminate pellicle, po- http://rcin.org.pl

195<br />

The foregoing subdivisions of APICOMPLEXA reflect Prof. S c h o 1t<br />

y s e c k's belief that asexual reproduction, i.e., schizogony (or merogony),<br />

represents a secondary development in the course of evolution<br />

of the phylum found only in the more advanced intracellular SPORO-<br />

ZOA. The more primitive gregarines and coccidia have only the sexual<br />

reproductive phase.<br />

According to the speaker, if one follows his approach to the taxonomy<br />

of APICOMPLEXA, the genus Perkinsus Levine, 1978, the sole<br />

member of the class PERK<strong>IN</strong>SEA Levine, 1978, is to be considered not<br />

as sporozoan, but as an apicomplexan. On the other hand, the members<br />

of the order AGAMOCOCCIDIIDA Levine, 1979 do not belong among<br />

COCCIDIA Leuckart, 1879.<br />

A different approach to APICOMPLEXA was presented by the second<br />

speaker, Prof. DESSER.<br />

It was his understanding that the name APICOMPLEXA was<br />

created by Levine (1970) to replace the older and generally employed<br />

name SPOROZOA which included only the gregarines, coccidia, and<br />

piroplasms. In addition to possessing the apical complex, as revealed<br />

by electron microscopy, the majority of the species belonging to API-<br />

COMPLEXA have life cycles that involve gamogony and sporogony;<br />

in most instances they include also merogony.<br />

The inclusion of the class PERK<strong>IN</strong>SEA Levine, 1978 among API-<br />

COMPLEXA (with the single genus Perkinsus Levine, 1978) in the most<br />

recent scheme published by the Society of Protozoologists (Levine<br />

et al., 1980) is not justified. Admittedly, the zoospores of this peculiar<br />

organism possess certain features which superficially resemble the apical<br />

complex. These features might have resulted, however, from convergent<br />

evolution of organisms of different ancestry and function in a similar<br />

manner to enable the parasites to assume their intracellular location.<br />

Moreover, these parasites do not undergo sexual reproduction, sporogony,<br />

or merogony. Finally, the zoospores of Perkinsus sp. (which are<br />

not sexual stages) are biflagellate (Perkins 1976). For those reasons,<br />

he felt that the class Perkinsea should be removed from the APICOM-<br />

PLEXA and that the original concept of APICOMPLEXA as the equivalent<br />

of SPOROZOA, be retained.<br />

Prof. Desser felt that not enough information is available at this<br />

time to justify definitive decisions with regard to the affinities of the<br />

piroplasms. One must agree with him that much evidence was provided<br />

during the Sixth Congress in support of this opinion. One of the<br />

lines of evidence was the demonstration by Prof. V i v i e r that Dactylosoma<br />

ranarum is an eimeriid coccidian rather than a piroplasm. Intraerythrocytic<br />

merozoites of these species have a trilaminate pellicle, po-<br />

http://rcin.org.pl

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!