14.06.2013 Views

PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY

PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY

PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>IN</strong>TERNATIONAL COLLABORATION AMONG PROTOZOOLOGISTS 303-<br />

fore, parasitology was well represented, with emphasis upon the problems<br />

of parasitism and symbiosis — about 50°/o of all contributions. According<br />

to tradition, strong emphasis was also placed upon morphogenesis and<br />

morphology; taxonomy; and evolution. The biochemical and physiological<br />

sections had, like those in the preceding Congress, a rather heterogeneous<br />

character. Among them was a round-table discussion of thebehavioral,<br />

physiological, and molecular aspects of movement.<br />

The Sixth Congress, held in Warsaw in 1981, was not as well attended<br />

as the previous ones, with 392 participants from 34 countries. On<br />

the basis of preregistration, the organizers had anticipated about 500.<br />

Nonetheless, and despite numerous difficulties, the meeting in Warsaw<br />

was a great success, characterized by a very friendly atmosphere. Theexperience<br />

gained from the previous meetings or Congresses was utilized,,<br />

and there was an attempt to balance several types of presentation<br />

for the exchange of information. Of special importance during the deliberations<br />

in Warsaw was the round-table discussion in which panel<br />

members attempted to reconcile numerous questions in the realm of<br />

systematics and phylogeny of protozoa.<br />

In analyzing the past Congresses, it is easy to note the changes of<br />

direction in protozoology which occurred between 1961 and 1981. Certain<br />

subjects predominated during the first two Congresses, to which lesstime<br />

was given in the later ones, reflecting these changes. From the<br />

Prague Congress to the Warsaw Congress, there was a steady improvement<br />

in organization, continually aiming at more suitable and varied<br />

forms of presentation. The Congresses of Protozoology never became<br />

gigantic, and this renders them especially conducive to preserving old<br />

and establishing new contacts among protozoologists, providing a very<br />

successful forum for the free exchange of ideas.<br />

The accompanying Table 1 contains the numbers of authors and the<br />

numbers of their summaries or abstracts that were printed in the Pro-<br />

Table l<br />

The numbers of abstracts and the numbers of authors of the abstracts<br />

published in the Proceedings ("Progress in Protozoology") of the<br />

several Congresses held to date<br />

International Congress of Protozoology<br />

No. of<br />

abstracts<br />

No. of<br />

authors<br />

I Prague (1961) 192 230<br />

II London (1965) 374 467<br />

III Leningrad (1969) 492 623<br />

IV Clermont-Ferrand (1973) 479 525<br />

V New York (1977) 478 745<br />

VI Warsaw (1981) 418 866<br />

http://rcin.org.pl

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!