PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY
PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY
PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>IN</strong>TERNATIONAL COLLABORATION AMONG PROTOZOOLOGISTS 303-<br />
fore, parasitology was well represented, with emphasis upon the problems<br />
of parasitism and symbiosis — about 50°/o of all contributions. According<br />
to tradition, strong emphasis was also placed upon morphogenesis and<br />
morphology; taxonomy; and evolution. The biochemical and physiological<br />
sections had, like those in the preceding Congress, a rather heterogeneous<br />
character. Among them was a round-table discussion of thebehavioral,<br />
physiological, and molecular aspects of movement.<br />
The Sixth Congress, held in Warsaw in 1981, was not as well attended<br />
as the previous ones, with 392 participants from 34 countries. On<br />
the basis of preregistration, the organizers had anticipated about 500.<br />
Nonetheless, and despite numerous difficulties, the meeting in Warsaw<br />
was a great success, characterized by a very friendly atmosphere. Theexperience<br />
gained from the previous meetings or Congresses was utilized,,<br />
and there was an attempt to balance several types of presentation<br />
for the exchange of information. Of special importance during the deliberations<br />
in Warsaw was the round-table discussion in which panel<br />
members attempted to reconcile numerous questions in the realm of<br />
systematics and phylogeny of protozoa.<br />
In analyzing the past Congresses, it is easy to note the changes of<br />
direction in protozoology which occurred between 1961 and 1981. Certain<br />
subjects predominated during the first two Congresses, to which lesstime<br />
was given in the later ones, reflecting these changes. From the<br />
Prague Congress to the Warsaw Congress, there was a steady improvement<br />
in organization, continually aiming at more suitable and varied<br />
forms of presentation. The Congresses of Protozoology never became<br />
gigantic, and this renders them especially conducive to preserving old<br />
and establishing new contacts among protozoologists, providing a very<br />
successful forum for the free exchange of ideas.<br />
The accompanying Table 1 contains the numbers of authors and the<br />
numbers of their summaries or abstracts that were printed in the Pro-<br />
Table l<br />
The numbers of abstracts and the numbers of authors of the abstracts<br />
published in the Proceedings ("Progress in Protozoology") of the<br />
several Congresses held to date<br />
International Congress of Protozoology<br />
No. of<br />
abstracts<br />
No. of<br />
authors<br />
I Prague (1961) 192 230<br />
II London (1965) 374 467<br />
III Leningrad (1969) 492 623<br />
IV Clermont-Ferrand (1973) 479 525<br />
V New York (1977) 478 745<br />
VI Warsaw (1981) 418 866<br />
http://rcin.org.pl