PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY
PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY
PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
274 H. PLATTNER ET AL»<br />
some fusion concentrated entirely on the physical effects on lipids (c.f.<br />
Papahadjopoulos 1978). It deserves also considerable interest<br />
now that membrane associated proteins were found more and more<br />
also on the contact sites of secretory organelles and plasmalemma in<br />
metazoan systems (for review see Plattner 1981).<br />
All this would imply that proto- and metazoan systems would not<br />
be principally different with regard to membrane fusion processes, but<br />
that protozoa would contain the same elements in an amplified form.<br />
One could further speculate, that regular MIP arrays and apposed "connecting<br />
material" would have to be present, wherever a membrane<br />
fusion event would have to take place precisely at a certain site. This<br />
assumption would hold not only for the above mentioned cases in<br />
protozoa but again also for some metazoan systems (e.g., neuromuscular<br />
junctions, where transmitter molecules are released rapidly and precisely<br />
over underlying junctional folds; c.f. Meldolesi et al. 1978).<br />
Further examples and arguments along these lines were presented<br />
elsewhere (Plattner 1981). Another example for the simultaneous<br />
occurrence of MIP arrays and membrane-attached materials in fusogenic<br />
zones of protist cells would be the mating structures of Chlamydomonas<br />
(see below).<br />
Other Fusion Sites in Protists<br />
The theory proposed above could also account for the occurrence of<br />
MIP aggregates in mating structures (Chlamydomonas: Weiss et al.<br />
1977 a; Euplotes: Luporini, personal communication). Regular MIP<br />
arrays were reported also from the Paramecium cytoproct and contractile<br />
vacuole outlet (Allen 1978 b), where they were thought, however,<br />
to reflect the pattern of underlying microtubules rather than being involved<br />
in membrane fusion events. MIP aggregates are also found<br />
around the contractile vacuole outlet of Chlamydomonas (Weiss et.<br />
al. 1977 b). For other membrane fusion events in protists see also the<br />
review articles by R. D. Allen (1978 a and these proceedings, Part I).<br />
Possible Changes During Fusion<br />
The actual fusion process is now assumed to be a rather focal event<br />
(Plattner 1981, see Fig. 7); quite a similar fusion model was recently<br />
put forward also for artificial lipid membranes (Hui et al. 1981). Also<br />
for this reason large intramembraneous MIP shifts before fusion would<br />
not be required, although it appears likely that the actual fusion site<br />
would be merely lipidic. It could be represented by a small focal pertur-<br />
http://rcin.org.pl