PDF, about 5Mb - Teksid Aluminum
PDF, about 5Mb - Teksid Aluminum PDF, about 5Mb - Teksid Aluminum
- Page 2 and 3: THE JOURNAL IS ALSO AVAILABLE ON TE
- Page 4 and 5: EDITORIAL The present issue marks a
- Page 6 and 7: FRACTURE TOUGHNESS AND MICROSTRUCTU
- Page 8 and 9: toughness tests were carried out im
- Page 10 and 11: Table 3: F values for the materials
- Page 12 and 13: A) B) A) C) Fig. 5: Fracture surfac
- Page 14 and 15: The simple correlation proposed by
- Page 16 and 17: INTRODUCTION The mechanical propert
- Page 18 and 19: RESULTS OF THE MICROSTRUCTURE AND M
- Page 20 and 21: In order to simulate the processes
- Page 22 and 23: µ µ µ µ µ
- Page 24 and 25: µ µ µ µ µ µ µ µ
- Page 26 and 27: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HIGH TEMPERATU
- Page 28 and 29: EXPERIMENTAL The AZ31 experimental
- Page 30 and 31: A) B) Fig. 4: Equi
- Page 32 and 33: A) C) Fig. 8: Microstructure of the
- Page 34 and 35: INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS To ensure
THE JOURNAL IS ALSO<br />
AVAILABLE ON<br />
TEKSID ALUMINUM<br />
WEB SITE:<br />
WWW.TEKSIDALUMINUM.COM<br />
Editorial Panel<br />
Paolo ANTONA<br />
Materials Consultant.<br />
Pietro APPENDINO<br />
Professor, Material Technology and Applied Chemistry; Faculty of Engineering,<br />
Turin Polytechnic.<br />
Marcello BADIALI<br />
R&D Director, <strong>Teksid</strong> <strong>Aluminum</strong>.<br />
Giuseppe CAGLIOTI<br />
Professor, Solid State Physics ; Faculty of Engineering, Milan Polytechnic.<br />
Enrico EVANGELISTA<br />
Professor, Metallurgy; Faculty of Engineering, Ancona Polytechnic.<br />
Luca Paolo FERRONI<br />
Marketing Director, <strong>Teksid</strong> <strong>Aluminum</strong>.<br />
Merton C. FLEMINGS<br />
Head Department of Materials Science and Engineering, M.I.T., Cambridge, Mass.<br />
Sergio GALLO<br />
Invited Professor, Applied Chemistry & Metallurgy; Faculty of Engineering, Turin<br />
Polytechnic. Past President <strong>Teksid</strong> S.p.A.<br />
Cinzia MODENA<br />
Editorial Coordinator, Metallurgical Science & Technology, <strong>Teksid</strong> <strong>Aluminum</strong>.<br />
Claudio MUS<br />
Materials Consultant.<br />
Walter NICODEMI<br />
Professor, Siderurgy & Siderurgical Technology; Faculty of Engineering, Milan Polytechnic.<br />
Editor in chief: Marcello BADIALI<br />
Registrazione presso il Tribunale di Torino n. 3298 del 12 maggio 1983<br />
Associato alla Unione Stampa Periodica Italiana<br />
Authors are asked to supply two typewritten copies of their papers. These<br />
should be laid out in accordance with the “Instructions for authors” on the<br />
inside back cover. All correspondence should be addressed to:<br />
Segreteria di redazione<br />
Metallurgical Science and Technology<br />
<strong>Teksid</strong> <strong>Aluminum</strong> S.r.l. Via Umberto II, 5<br />
10022 Carmagnola (TO) Italy - Tel. +39.011.9794606<br />
e-mail: journal@teksidaluminum.com<br />
Publication distributed free of charge<br />
© Copyright 1983 <strong>Teksid</strong> S.p.A. - All rights reserved.<br />
Editorial coordination: Cinzia Modena, Marketing, <strong>Teksid</strong> <strong>Aluminum</strong><br />
Graphics and layout: EMMEDI pencil & mouse - Via S. Ambrogio, 23 - Torino<br />
Printed in Italy: Graficat - Via Cuniberti, 47 - Torino<br />
No part of the texts published in this journal may be reproduced, whether in<br />
the original language or in translation, without permission in writing from<br />
<strong>Teksid</strong> <strong>Aluminum</strong>.<br />
Papers submitted for publication as a rule should illustrate unpublished original<br />
research works, experiments, or critical reviews. Publication will depend on<br />
the approval of the Editorial Panel.
E. Gariboldi, D. Ripamonti,<br />
L. Signorelli, G. Vimercati,<br />
F. Casaro<br />
S. Seifeddine, T. Sjögren,<br />
I. L. Svensson<br />
M. El Mehtedi, L. Balloni,<br />
S. Spigarelli, E. Evangelista,<br />
G. Rosen, B.H. Lee, C.S. Lee<br />
Metallurgical<br />
Science and Technology<br />
A journal published<br />
by <strong>Teksid</strong> <strong>Aluminum</strong><br />
twice a year<br />
Vol. 25 No. 1, July 2007<br />
FRACTURE TOUGHNESS AND<br />
MICROSTRUCTURE IN AA 2XXX<br />
ALUMINIUM ALLOYS<br />
VARIATIONS IN MICROSTRUCTURE AND<br />
MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF CAST<br />
ALUMINIUM EN AC 43100 ALLOY<br />
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HIGH<br />
TEMPERATURE WORKABILITY OF ZM21<br />
AND AZ31 MAGNESIUM ALLOYS<br />
PAGE<br />
3<br />
12<br />
23
EDITORIAL<br />
The present issue marks an important goal for <strong>Teksid</strong> <strong>Aluminum</strong>: the 25th<br />
anniversary of Metallurgical Science and Technology (MS&T). Twenty five years<br />
of life represent a remarkable milestone which is not commonly reached<br />
by a scientific journal. MS&T is one of the few specialized editorial products<br />
edited by an industrial company. It has been always delivered world wide,<br />
free of charge and with continuity.<br />
This moment deserves a word on the nature of the Journal, on its intrinsic,<br />
permanent features as well as on its evolution and future perspectives.<br />
The birth of MS&T originated from the initiative of professor Sergio Gallo,<br />
former President of <strong>Teksid</strong> S.p.A., together with full professors Aurelio<br />
Burdese of the Politecnico di Torino and Walter Nicodemi of the Politecnico<br />
di Milano. They suggested to earmark part of the financial resources destined<br />
to the image promotion activities of the company for a specialized scientific<br />
review. Their proposal was warmly agreed by Antonio Mosconi, the then<br />
Managing Director of <strong>Teksid</strong>, who, in the first issue’s introduction, wrote:<br />
“The aim of Metallurgical Science and Technology is to initiate a dialogue,<br />
already part of the scene in other countries, between all those<br />
resources that are committed to the search for new frontiers in<br />
metallurgical techniques, so as to derive the greatest synergies from<br />
them.<br />
Metallurgical Science and Technology then enters the scene as an<br />
instrument whereby the dialogue between metallurgical science and<br />
metalworking industry can be taken to greater depths.<br />
‘Academic’ metallurgy indeed, has often shown signs of hankering<br />
after pure science, estranged from industry. It should not be forgotten<br />
that its final objective remains practical application.<br />
A journal such as this is not as ambitious as to imaging that it can<br />
entirely fill the goal. Its aim is rather to inculcate the habit of<br />
comparison and so cast a permanent bridge between the two parties.<br />
Its very existence shows that the need to set up a more systematic<br />
and continuous two-way flow of information is seen by both sides as<br />
an indispensable prelude to its development.”<br />
Since these targets and perspectives were indicated, several changes have<br />
occurred in the life of <strong>Teksid</strong> Group, the sponsor and editor of the journal.<br />
The original name of the company, <strong>Teksid</strong>, evokes a core business centered<br />
on cast iron foundry. Founded in 1978 as a spin-off of Fiat metallurgical<br />
activities, its experience rooted in the very beginning of the Italian industrial<br />
development which started-up in the early century. Steel and cast-iron<br />
production were then the company’s core business focus. The global trend<br />
toward “energy conservation” triggered by the recurrent oil crises of the<br />
seventies and eighties induced <strong>Teksid</strong> to share and favor the efforts aiming<br />
at vehicle weight reduction: the interest of the Company then gradually<br />
Metallurgical Science and Technology<br />
shifted to light metal alloys – like magnesium and,<br />
above all, aluminum – as base materials. <strong>Teksid</strong> was<br />
then split into divisions depending on the material<br />
their industrial activity was dedicated to (iron,<br />
aluminum and magnesium). In 2002 the aluminum<br />
division was sold to the private equity market to<br />
give birth to <strong>Teksid</strong> <strong>Aluminum</strong>, today’s publisher<br />
of MS&T.<br />
It is known that today’s market dynamics, especially<br />
in the car production industry, is much and<br />
dramatically faster than in the past years, and <strong>Teksid</strong><br />
<strong>Aluminum</strong> had to react to the changing scenario<br />
through a severe restructuring and divestiture<br />
process, which largely resized its traditional<br />
footprint of an international and industry leading<br />
company.<br />
The evolution experienced by <strong>Teksid</strong> <strong>Aluminum</strong><br />
and the radical changes occurred during the last<br />
decades in science, in technology and consequently<br />
in our society, have left the objectives of the journal<br />
unchanged, and its contents have evolved<br />
coherently with the scientific and technologic<br />
trends of metallurgy.<br />
In the Company strategy, these changes have been<br />
accompanied by a constant search for innovative<br />
and competitive product solutions, by a constant<br />
effort to enable the costumers enjoy the company’<br />
s collaboration, from the concept stage to the<br />
delivery of unfinished or completely machined<br />
products and by a constant attention the best<br />
combination of technical performance and<br />
product quality.<br />
This evolution has been reflected by MS&T too.<br />
This is not the place for presenting an exhaustive<br />
list of the topics covered by the journal in all<br />
these years. However probably some readers<br />
will remember academic and technological<br />
contributions dedicated to innovative forming<br />
techniques – such as lost-foam or semisolid<br />
forming, – or to the challenges derived by the<br />
emergence of new structural materials such as cast
magnesium alloys, or to thermomechanical<br />
treatments – like liquid hot isostatic pressing, –<br />
and to new experimental methods for testing metal<br />
properties and performance – thermoelastoplastic<br />
yield stress vs. conventional yield stress, and much<br />
more.<br />
Since its birth, this journal has hosted contributions<br />
of both academic research and metalworking<br />
industry from all over the world. Perhaps the<br />
‘academicians’ have cooperated more<br />
enthusiastically than the industrial researchers to<br />
the “two-way flow of information” originally<br />
wished, but these attitudes is to be attributed both<br />
to the confidential nature of industrial research<br />
and to the old academic caveat “publish or perish”<br />
still alive in the web era..<br />
In all these years <strong>Teksid</strong> <strong>Aluminum</strong> has treasured the MS&T bridging role<br />
between science and industrial expertise in the R&D programs of the Group.<br />
Furthermore the metallurgic community could enjoy a 25-year long support<br />
to scientific divulgation. We can assert that the targets, originally indicated<br />
by Mr. Mosconi, have been reached. Nowadays MS&T papers published since<br />
1983 can be found in university libraries, academic institutions and industrial<br />
R&D laboratories all over the world. Notably, all the issues published since<br />
the year 2000 can be also retrieved comfortably from the Company website<br />
(www.teksidaluminum.com).<br />
The topics such as those mentioned above and unpredictable new ones –<br />
specifically related to light metals and alloys - will continue to arouse interest<br />
of contributors and readers of MS&T for many years to come, as the<br />
increasing cooperation and subscriptions testify.<br />
In a joyful anniversary like this one, we cannot conclude this editorial other<br />
than by congratulating with Metallurgical Science & Technology for its longevity<br />
and scientific maturity, and by wishing Happy Birthday and a long life!<br />
Metallurgical Science and Technology<br />
Editorial Panel
FRACTURE TOUGHNESS AND<br />
MICROSTRUCTURE IN AA 2XXX<br />
ALUMINIUM ALLOYS<br />
1 E. Gariboldi, 1 D. Ripamonti, 1 L. Signorelli, 1 G. Vimercati, 2 F. Casaro<br />
1 Politecnico di Milano, Dipartimento di Meccanica, Milano (MI)<br />
2 Varian Vacuum Technologies, Leinì (TO)<br />
Abstract<br />
The paper presents the toughness properties of forgings made of two AA 2xxx series<br />
aluminium alloys with different microstructural conditions. Fracture toughness tests in<br />
crack opening mode I were performed on compact tension specimens machined from<br />
the forgings in different orientations. The tests were performed both at room temperature<br />
and at 130°C.<br />
Fracture toughness properties were related to microstructural and fractographic features<br />
of the alloys in order to discuss on their failure mechanisms. The effect of the coarse<br />
intermetallic phases within grains or at their boundaries in the different conditions was<br />
underlined. The testing temperature, within the range here investigated, neither affected<br />
fracture toughness properties nor failure mechanisms.<br />
KEYWORDS<br />
Al alloy AA2014, Al alloy AA2618, fracture toughness, microstructure.<br />
3 - Metallurgical Science and Technology<br />
Riassunto<br />
Il lavoro illustra le proprietà di tenacità alla frattura misurate<br />
in forgiati di grandi dimensioni realizzati con due leghe di<br />
alluminio della serie 2xxx in differenti condizioni<br />
microstrutturali. Dai forgiati sono stati ricavati provini CT<br />
con differenti orientazioni sui quali sono state condotte<br />
prove di tenacità a frattura secondo il modo I di apertura<br />
della cricca. Le proprietà ottenute sono state correlate<br />
con la microstruttura riscontrata nei campioni e completate<br />
con analisi frattografiche atte ad individuare i meccanismi<br />
di cedimento. È stato così messo in luce l’effetto delle<br />
diverse microstrutture ed in particolare delle particelle<br />
grossolane di fasi intermetalliche presenti a bordo grano<br />
o all’interno dei grani che differenziano i forgiati nelle leghe<br />
esaminate di composizione più complessa.
1. INTRODUCTION<br />
Aluminium-alloy forging is currently used to<br />
manufacture structural components of relatively<br />
large and complex shape. The plastic deformation<br />
imparted to the material can positively affect its<br />
microstructure by promoting recrystallization<br />
cycles and a greater homogeneity of alloying<br />
elements. However, it should be considered that<br />
in large size forgings, the relatively low amount of<br />
plastic strain given to the alloy cannot completely<br />
refine the structure and intermetallic particles as<br />
in other small-size wrought products such as<br />
extruded bars or rolled sheets. In addition, the<br />
slower quenching rates experienced by large<br />
forgings result in lower mechanical properties<br />
achieved after the subsequent aging process. Large<br />
differences in cooling rate between surface and<br />
centre of large forgings during solution annealing<br />
also result in remarkable residual stresses, that are<br />
often relieved by inserting a plastic deformation<br />
step after quenching and before the aging<br />
treatment [1]. This method also modifies the<br />
precipitation sequence and kinetics of the alloy.<br />
The above described effects significantly affect the<br />
tensile and fracture properties of aluminium alloy<br />
forgings. Focusing the attention on the fracture of<br />
aluminium alloys, it was reported that toughness<br />
is strictly related to the presence of coarse<br />
particles, 0.1 to 10 µm in diameter, that can be<br />
either non-equilibrium particles formed during<br />
2. MATERIALS INVESTIGATED<br />
The present investigation was carried out on three<br />
forgings having a roughly cylindrical shape with a<br />
diameter of 250 mm, made of aluminium<br />
alloys AA2014 (Al4CuSiMg) and AA2618<br />
(Al2Cu1.5MgNi). The parts had been forged from<br />
extruded bars of diameter 190 mm with different<br />
manufacturing cycles.<br />
Two forged samples of the AA2014 alloy were<br />
produced by forging in two steps at 390°C. The<br />
samples were then heat treated to T6 temper by<br />
different parameters. A first sample, hereafter<br />
referred to as 2014-A forging was solution<br />
annealed at 505°C for 6 hours, water quenched<br />
and artificially aged at 160°C for 14 hours, following<br />
the usual industrial heat treatment route. In the<br />
case of the forging in AA2618 alloy (hereafter<br />
referred to as 2618 forging), the solution annealing<br />
at the usual temperature for this material, 530°C,<br />
lasted 1 hour, and it was followed by water<br />
quenching and by artificial aging at 190°C for 20<br />
solidification or inclusions from insoluble impurities [2]. These particles<br />
crack easily as the matrix deforms within the plastic flow zone at the crack<br />
tip and causes the typical ductile fracture mode where crack propagates<br />
via coalescence of voids. The amount, size and distribution of these second<br />
phase particles is thus relevant for the fracture toughness properties and<br />
even material with comparable tensile properties can display significantly<br />
different fracture toughness properties.<br />
In addition to the abovementioned effect, the role played by submicrometer<br />
particles (0.01 to 0.5 µm in diameter) need to be considered. In the case of<br />
the same volume fraction and microstructural features of coarse particles,<br />
a substantial modification of toughness can be observed in age hardenable<br />
aluminium alloys varying the amount and characteristics of fine hardening<br />
particles. The behaviour is complex and the fine hardening particles are<br />
responsible for it. It is well known that the presence of particle having<br />
suitable distribution and size enhances the resistance of peak aged alloys to<br />
deformation and thus tends to reduce the extension of the plastic zone,<br />
positively affecting toughness [2, 3]. On the other hand, the lower strainhardening<br />
capacity of the material in the peak aged condition with respect<br />
to the underaged condition, also gives rise to local plastic instabilities that<br />
significantly contribute to reduce the material toughness [2]. Further, where<br />
grain boundary precipitate free zones are observed, strain localization in<br />
these regions and intergranular ductile fracture can occur [3, 4]. In these<br />
cases the fracture toughness depends on the spacing and size of the voidnucleating<br />
particles at grain boundaries [4, 5]. The higher fracture toughness<br />
displayed by alloys in the underaged with respect to over-aged condition as<br />
well as the transition towards intergranular ductile fracture mode as<br />
overaging proceeds confirm this latter effect [2, 4].<br />
The aim of the present paper is to contribute to a better understanding of<br />
the correlation between microstructure, tensile and toughness properties<br />
of aluminium forgings as a result of different thermomechanical cycles,<br />
focusing in particular to the role of large second phase particles.<br />
hours, following a common industrial practice. The 2014-B forging was<br />
produced and heat treated as for 2618 material, leading to a substantially<br />
overaged matrix and to intermetallic phases distribution rather different<br />
than that of 2014-A forging.<br />
Light optical microscopy observations and Vickers hardness tests (0.98N<br />
load) were performed to evaluate the general microstructural features.<br />
Tensile test specimens were machined from the forgings in the hoop direction<br />
in regions characterized by a homogeneous structure and hardness.<br />
Two sets of Compact Tension (CT) fracture toughness specimens were<br />
machined with cracks laying in diametral planes of the forgings. In the first<br />
set, the crack propagation direction was radial (CR direction according to<br />
ASTM E399-90 and B645-02 [6, 7]) while in the second set it was longitudinal<br />
(CL direction). The specimens had a thickness B of 20 mm [6, 7].<br />
Tests were carried out on a MTS 810 universal testing machine, equipped<br />
with an environmental chamber suitable for test temperatures up to 250°C.<br />
Before fracture toughness tests, a precracking stage was performed at test<br />
temperature until a total crack length (machined notch and fatigue crack)<br />
of <strong>about</strong> 20 mm was reached. Precracking was performed under load control<br />
(sinusoidal cycles at 10 Hz frequency) while crack length was monitored<br />
via the elastic compliance technique by measuring the Crack Opening<br />
Displacement (COD). The stress intensity factor during pre-cracking<br />
decreased linearly with crack length from 11 to 8 MPa•m 1/2 . Fracture<br />
4 - Metallurgical Science and Technology
toughness tests were carried out imposing a displacement rate of 0,025<br />
mm/s, monitoring the COD and applied load until the occurrence of unstable<br />
crack propagation.<br />
In a second stage of the research study, the toughness of the materials at<br />
130°C was investigated. The J IC integral was measured according to the<br />
single-specimen technique and the ASTM E1820-01 standard [8]. The J IC<br />
parameter was evaluated instead of K IC since the material toughness was<br />
expected to be greater than that measured at room temperature. The tests<br />
were performed monitoring crack length via the compliance method at<br />
fixed steps of COD. In order to reduce the strain accumulated under load<br />
during each load step due to creep effects at 130°C, the holding period<br />
under constant applied load (P) for the adjustment of the crack length was<br />
fixed to 1 s. J Q was estimated according to the mentioned standard as the<br />
intercept between the power-law curve (fitting the experimental data within<br />
the range stated by ASTM E1820-01) and the straight line passing to the<br />
3. RESULTS<br />
3.1 MICROSTRUCTURE<br />
All forgings were characterized by grains elongated along the main plastic<br />
flow path experienced during forging. Coarse intermetallic particles were<br />
also present in the microstructure, as expected for these alloys. More<br />
specifically, the 2014-A material (figure 1a) was characterized by elongated<br />
grains with a transversal size of <strong>about</strong> 50 µm and by large intermetallic<br />
particles aligned in the flow direction: globular Al 2 Cu (θ) particles (bright<br />
particles in figure 1a) and blocky shaped clustered particles containing Fe,<br />
Mn, Si and Cu (darker particles in the same figure). In regions where these<br />
particles were observed small equiaxed grains were often detected<br />
A B<br />
C D<br />
5 - Metallurgical Science and Technology<br />
point ∆a = 0.2 mm, P = 0 N with a slope<br />
corresponding to a double flow stress (this latter<br />
corresponding to the average between the yield<br />
and the ultimate tensile stress).<br />
Validity requirements of J 1C tests were not met in<br />
all cases since unstable crack propagation or popin<br />
phenomena occurred in some samples. In these<br />
cases the K Q parameter was evaluated from the<br />
P-COD curves.<br />
Fracture surfaces were observed by scanning<br />
electron microscopy (SEM). Metallographic<br />
sections were also cut perpendicularly to the crack<br />
plane to observe the crack propagation path by<br />
optical microscopy and SEM.<br />
suggesting the local recrystallization effect induced<br />
by these intermetallics.<br />
The direction of plastic flow was less evident in<br />
the 2014-B samples, that displayed rather elongated<br />
grains of 50-100 µm in transverse size together<br />
with smaller equiaxed grains in the regions<br />
containing large intermetallic particles (figure 1b).<br />
These were in lower amount with respect to the<br />
previous alloy. Particles with dark appearance at<br />
grain boundaries (figure 1b) were of complex<br />
chemical composition. On the contrary globular<br />
Al 2 Cu particles had a bright appearance in<br />
Fig. 1:<br />
Typical microstructure of<br />
the investigated forgings.<br />
2014-A (a), 2014-B (b),<br />
2618 at low (c) and<br />
higher (d) magnification.<br />
The longitudinal axis of<br />
forgings is horizontal in<br />
all the micrographs.
micrographs and were observed both inter- and<br />
intragranularly.<br />
The 2618 sample was characterized by very large<br />
grains slightly elongated in the flow direction. Their<br />
size in the transverse direction was of the order<br />
of 500 µm, as shown in figure 1c. As expected,<br />
considering the composition of the AA2618 alloy<br />
[1], several intragranular FeNiAl 9 particles were<br />
observed together with globular Al 2 Cu and (CuFe)<br />
Al 3 precipitates.<br />
The microstructure and hardness of the forgings<br />
were in all cases homogeneous in the regions<br />
where tension and toughness specimens were<br />
sampled.<br />
3.2 MECHANICAL BEHAVIOUR<br />
The average tensile properties in hoop direction<br />
of the investigated materials at room temperature<br />
and at 130°C are summarized in Table I. At room<br />
temperature, the 2014-A forging showed the<br />
highest tensile strength and the lowest ductility.<br />
The increase in test temperature from 20 to 130°C<br />
led to a significant reduction in the ultimate tensile<br />
strength (UTS) and 0,2% proof stress (YS) and to<br />
a corresponding significant increase in reduction<br />
of area (Z) and elongation (A) at fracture.<br />
The results of the fracture toughness tests are<br />
summarized in Table 2 while representative load<br />
vs. COD graphs are shown in Figure 2. Here, the<br />
lines needed for the evaluation of K Q are added<br />
A) B)<br />
6 - Metallurgical Science and Technology<br />
Table 1: Tensile properties of<br />
the investigated alloys<br />
YS [MPa] UTS [MPa] A [%] Z [%]<br />
Temperature 20°C 130°C 20°C 130°C 20°C 130°C 20°C 130°C<br />
2014-A 421 386 454 402 1,8 9,3 3,7 15,8<br />
2014-B 357 341 425 393 7,3 8,4 14,2 16,9<br />
2618 350 345 416 409 6,4 8,6 10,8 12,3<br />
Table 2: Fracture toughness of the materials<br />
investigated (K Q or K IC according to ASTM B645<br />
and K JIC accordiing to ASTM E1820)<br />
Specimen Temperature 2014-A 2014-B 2618<br />
direction [°C] MPa . m Ω MPa . m Ω MPa . m Ω<br />
CL 20 19,3 (K IC ) 23,0 (K Q ) 22,4 (K Q )<br />
CL 20 20,1 (K IC ) 24,9 (K Q ) 23,3 (K Q )<br />
Average CL 20 19,7 (K IC ) 24,0 (K Q ) 22,9 (K Q )<br />
CL 130 18,8 (K IC ) 23,4 (K JIC ) 21,9 (K Q )<br />
CR 20 23,4 (K IC ) 24,8 (K Q ) 26,9 (K Q )<br />
CR 20 22,8 (K IC ) 24,4 (K Q ) 26,7 (K Q )<br />
Average CR 20 23,1 (K IC ) 24,6 (K Q ) 26,8 (K Q )<br />
CR 130 21,4 (K JIC ) 23,4 (K JIC ) 25,6 (K Q )<br />
to the experimental curves<br />
The condition of plain strain crack propagation in CT specimen fracture<br />
can be met for sufficiently large specimens. The minimum specimen thickness<br />
Fig. 2: Load vs. COD plots of the samples tested at 20°C.<br />
A) 2014-A forging, CL specimen; B) 2014-B forging, CR specimen
Table 3: F values for the materials and specimen<br />
orientation investigated<br />
Specimen Temperature 2014-A 2014-B 2618<br />
direction [°C]<br />
CL 20 9.4 4.8 4.9<br />
CL 20 8.7 4.1 4.5<br />
Average CL 20 9.1 4.5 4.7<br />
CL 130 9.1 4.2 4.9<br />
CR 20 6.4 4.1 3.4<br />
CR 20 6.8 4.3 3.4<br />
Average CR 20 6.6 4.2 3.4<br />
CR 130 7.4 3.3 3.6<br />
Table 4: J IC values (N/mm) of the investigated<br />
forgings tested at 130°C<br />
Specimen Temperature 2014-A 2014-B 2618<br />
direction [°C] [N/mm] [N/mm] [N/mm]<br />
CL 130 - 7.23 -<br />
CR 130 5.96 7.00 -<br />
(B) to be adopted can be calculated, at the end of the tests, according to<br />
the two standard above considered:<br />
B min =5·(K Q /YS) 2 according to ASTM B645 (1)<br />
B min =2,5·(K Q /YS) 2 according to ASTM E399 (2)<br />
A) B)<br />
Fig. 2: Load vs. COD plots of the samples tested at 20°C.<br />
A) 2014-A forging, CL specimen; B) 2014-B forging, CR specimen<br />
7 - Metallurgical Science and Technology<br />
Thus, the minimum thickness required by the E399<br />
standard is half of that required by the B645<br />
standard for aluminium alloys. The agreement to<br />
plain strain conditions and the possible deviation<br />
from the minimum value of B can be evaluated<br />
using a parameter F, defined as:<br />
F=B·(YS/K Q ) 2 (3)<br />
Where F greater than 5 means that the<br />
requirements for plain strain condition are met<br />
for both standards and valid K IC can be obtained.<br />
2,5
according to the ASTM E1820 standard. As far as<br />
the AA2618 alloy that resulted to be the toughest<br />
material at room temperature, at 130°C it showed<br />
unstable crack propagation (Figure 3b) that<br />
prevented the evaluation of J IC. In the cases of valid<br />
J IC , K JIC was computed, assuming plain strain<br />
conditions, by using the following correlation<br />
proposed by ASTM E1820 standard:<br />
3.3. FRACTOGRAPHIC<br />
OBSERVATIONS<br />
Fractographic observations were performed at<br />
two main locations on fracture surface of each<br />
specimen in the crack propagation region: the first<br />
next to, the latter at 4 mm from the boundary<br />
with fatigue precrack. Selected images at low<br />
magnification of the first location for the different<br />
alloys and specimen orientation are reported in<br />
figure 4. In the unstable crack propagation region,<br />
the 2014-A forging showed the typical features of<br />
ductile fracture, generated by nucleation of dimples<br />
mainly from the coarser intermetallic particles<br />
fractured in a brittle way (figure 5a). Within the<br />
matrix, regions with dimples of far smaller size<br />
were also visible, laying on well-defined planes<br />
A)<br />
C)<br />
K JIC = [(E/(1-v 2 ))•J IC ] 0.5 (4)<br />
K JIC values are also listed in Table 2 for comparison purpose. Examination of<br />
this table clearly shows that toughness of 2014-B forging is greater than<br />
that of the same alloy in forging 2014-A. Further, it can be stated that in all<br />
the examined samples, crack propagation in CL orientation is favoured<br />
with respect to that in CR orientation.<br />
(figure 5b). These can be correlated to the presence of fine particles that in<br />
some cases were observed inside the dimples in high magnification images<br />
that suggest ductile intergranular fracture.<br />
The fracture surfaces of the 2014-B forging did not show significant<br />
differences from 2014-A material, with relatively extended regions of<br />
microdimples (figure 7a) that could be correlated to the presence of coarse<br />
grain boundary particles (figure 6b). The size and distribution of these<br />
particles corresponded to those observed at grain boundaries (figure 4c).<br />
The 2618 forging, showed a transgranular ductile fracture mode (figures<br />
4d, 7b). Dimples observed on fracture surfaces nucleated from the<br />
homogeneously distributed FeNiAl 9 particles (figures 6c and 6d).<br />
The fracture surfaces of specimens tested at 130°C of forgings made of<br />
AA2014 alloy were similar to those tested at room temperatures (figure<br />
8a). On the contrary, as the temperature increased, small-size microdimples<br />
were observed on the fracture surface of the forging made of AA2618 alloy<br />
(compare figure 7b and 8b).<br />
Fig. 4: Fracture surface of cracks propagated at room temperature in the boundary region between fatigue precracking and unstable crack<br />
propagation region. 2014-A forging, CL (a) and CR (b) directions. 2014-B forging; CR direction (c) and 2618, CR direction (d).<br />
B)<br />
D)<br />
8 - Metallurgical Science and Technology
A) B)<br />
A)<br />
C)<br />
Fig. 5: Fracture surface of cracks propagating at room temperature in 2014-A forging in CL (a) and CR (b) direction.<br />
Fig. 6: Microstructure in the region of unstable crack propagation on longitudinal section of CT specimens. a) 2014-A forging, CL direction;<br />
b) 2014-B forging, CL direction; c) and d) 2618 forging, CL and CR directions, respectively.<br />
B)<br />
D)<br />
A) B)<br />
Fig. 7: Fracture surface sampled in CL direction of 2014-B forging (a) and of 2618 forging (b) tested at room temperature.<br />
9 - Metallurgical Science and Technology
A) B)<br />
Fig. 8: Fracture surface of cracks propagated at 130°C in specimen with CL orientation of 2014-A (a) and 2618 (b) forgings.<br />
4. DISCUSSION<br />
In the examined forgings crack propagated in a<br />
ductile manner, in some cases by an intergranular<br />
ductile mode, linking the early fractured coarse<br />
intermetallic particles, located at inter or<br />
intragranular position in the different materials<br />
investigated.<br />
Following the approach proposed by Hahn and<br />
Rosenfield [2] for aluminium alloys, it can be stated<br />
that crack propagates when the size of extensive<br />
plastic strain formed ahead of the crack tip<br />
corresponds to the average coarse interparticle<br />
distance (δ) Further, according to these authors,<br />
K and d are correlated as follows:<br />
δ =(0.5K 2 )/(E•YS) (5)<br />
In the case of 2618 forging the δ values estimated<br />
using room temperature tensile and toughness<br />
properties were 11 and 15 µm for specimen<br />
orientations CL and CR, respectively, comparable<br />
to the average interparticle size between the<br />
intragranular particles (mainly FeNiAl 9 particles)<br />
in longitudinal and radial direction, respectively. The<br />
preferred particle orientation and their tendency<br />
to align axially in the forging regions where<br />
specimens were sampled corresponds to a greater<br />
CONCLUSIONS<br />
The toughness properties in opening mode I of<br />
forgings made of AA2014 and AA2618 aluminium<br />
alloys with different microstrctural conditions were<br />
presented.<br />
Fracture toughness ranged between 19 and 26<br />
MPam 0.5 , depending on the material and specimen<br />
direction. Fracture toughness was in general lower<br />
interparticle distance in the crack propagation direction of CR specimens.<br />
As previously presented, in the specimens obtained from forgings made of<br />
AA2014 alloy the crack proceeds in a ductile manner but along an<br />
intergranular path, intercepting the oriented coarse aligned intermetallic<br />
particles axially. The values of δ computed from equation 5 for these two<br />
forgings are 6.7 and 9 µm for CL and CR specimen of 2014-A forging,<br />
respectively. In the case of the last forging (2014-B), δ equals 12 µm for<br />
both CL and CR directions. Thus, also in the case of AA2014 alloy, d is<br />
comparable to the interparticle distance along the crack path. It can be<br />
thus stated that fracture toughness is correlated to the mean interparticle<br />
distance along the crack path.<br />
The above observations well agree with the simple correlation proposed<br />
by Hahn and Rosenfield [2] for the case of forged Al-alloy parts (where<br />
fracture is initiated by cracking of large intermetallic particles once reached<br />
critical stress/strain levels in the region of extensive deformation at the<br />
crack tip [3]) and fracture toughness is correlated to the mean interparticle<br />
distance along the crack path.<br />
Thus, forgings of the same heat treatable alloy, even in the same heat<br />
treatment condition and with comparable hardness and tensile properties<br />
can show significantly different fracture behaviour, depending on intermetallic<br />
particle population. Especially, as the mean interparticle distance along the<br />
crack path between the coarser intermetallic particles increases, the<br />
nucleation of voids at these particles is shifted at higher applied loads and<br />
toughness is improved.<br />
The role of coarse intermetallic particles and the need to reduce their<br />
amount, to optimize their size and distribution in forgings (taking into account<br />
the most critical crack propagation directions in the components) in order<br />
to increase material toughness is therefore highlighted.<br />
for specimen sampled in CL direction. In the examined forgings crack<br />
propagated in ductile manner, in some cases by an intergranular ductile<br />
mode, linking in any case the voids formed at the early fractured inter- or<br />
intragranular coarse intermetallic particles. No significant difference in<br />
toughness nor in the fracture mode was observed when tests were<br />
performed at room temperature or at 130°C.<br />
Fracture toughness properties were related to the presence and distribution<br />
of the coarse intermetallic phases within grains or at their boundaries in<br />
the different investigated alloys.<br />
10 - Metallurgical Science and Technology
The simple correlation proposed by Hahn and Rosenfield between fracture<br />
toughness and the mean interparticle size was found to be applicable when<br />
the interparticle distance along the crack path (different for different sampling<br />
direction in forgings where these particle were aligned along flow directions)<br />
is taken into account. An observation and quantitative assessment of the<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[1] J.S. Robinson, R.L. Cudd, J.T. Evans. Creep resistant aluminium alloys<br />
and their applications. Material Science and Technology, 19 (2003) pp.<br />
143-155.<br />
[2] G.T. Hahn, A.R. Rosenfield. Metallurgical Factors Affecting Fracture<br />
Toughness of <strong>Aluminum</strong> Alloys. Metall. Trans. A, (1975) pp. 653-668.<br />
[3] T. Kobayashi. Strength and fracture of aluminium alloys. Materials Science<br />
Engineering, A286 (2000) pp. 333-341.<br />
[4] A.P. Reynolds, E.P. Crooks. The effect of thermal exposure on the fracture<br />
behaviour of aluminium alloys intended for elevated temperature<br />
service. in “Elevated temperature on fatigue and fracture”, ASTM STP<br />
1297. Williamsbourg, Virginia(USA), (1997) 191-205.<br />
[5] B.Q. Li, A.P. Reynolds. Correlation of grain-boundaries precipitates<br />
parameters with fracture youghness in an Al-Cu-Mg-Ag alloy subjected<br />
to long-term thermal exposure. Journal of Materials Science, 33 (1998)<br />
pp. 5849-5853.<br />
[6] ASTM B 645-02 Practice for plane-strain fracture toughness testing of<br />
aluminium alloys.<br />
[7] ASTM E 399-99 Standard test method for plane-strain fracture<br />
toughness of metallic materials.<br />
[8] ASTM E1820-01. Standard test method for measurement of fracture<br />
toughness.<br />
11 - Metallurgical Science and Technology<br />
distribution of coarse intermetallic phases on<br />
optical micrographs can be a useful tool to check<br />
fracture toughness properties of different forgings<br />
in their peak aged condition when yield strength<br />
is known.
VARIATIONS IN MICROSTRUCTURE AND<br />
MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF CAST<br />
ALUMINIUM EN AC 43100 ALLOY<br />
Salem Seifeddine, Torsten Sjögren and Ingvar L Svensson<br />
Jönköping University, School of Engineering, Component technology - Sweden<br />
Abstract<br />
The microstructure and mechanical properties of a gravity<br />
die and sand cast Al-10%Si-0.4%Mg alloy, which is one of<br />
the most important and frequently used industrial casting<br />
alloys, were examined. Tensile test samples were prepared<br />
from fan blades and sectioned through three positions<br />
which experienced different cooling rates. Furthermore,<br />
the inherent strength potential of the alloy was revealed<br />
by producing homogeneous and well fed specimens with a<br />
variety of microstructural coarseness, low content of oxide<br />
films and micro-porosity defects, solidified in a laboratory<br />
environment by gradient solidification technology. The<br />
solidification behaviour of the alloy was characterized by<br />
thermal analysis. By means of cooling curves, the<br />
solidification time and evolution of the microstructure was<br />
recorded. The relation between the microstructure and<br />
the mechanical properties was also assessed by using quality<br />
index-strength charts developed for the alloy. This study<br />
shows that the microstructural features, especially the ironrich<br />
needles denoted as β-Al FeSi, and mechanical<br />
5<br />
properties are markedly affected by the different processing<br />
routes. The solidification rate exerts a significant effect on<br />
the coarseness of the microstructure and the intermetallic<br />
compounds that evolve during solidification, and this<br />
directly influences the tensile properties.<br />
KEYWORDS<br />
Aluminium cast alloys, gravity- and sand casting,<br />
gradient solidification technique, thermal analysis,<br />
porosity, quality index.<br />
Riassunto<br />
In questo lavoro sono state esaminate la microstruttura e le proprietà meccaniche di<br />
una delle leghe più comuni nell’industria delle leghe leggere, la lega Al-10%Si-0.4%Mg,<br />
colata per gravità sia in conchiglia che in sabbia. Le provette di trazione sono state<br />
ricavate da pala di ventilatore e sono state sezionate in tre posizioni caratterizzate da<br />
diverse velocità di raffreddamento. Inoltre è stato valutato il valore potenziale di resistenza<br />
a trazione ottenibile della lega, mediante produzione di campioni caratterizzati da diversa<br />
morfologia strutturale, basso contenuto di film ossidi microporosità, solidificati in<br />
ambiente controllato con metodologia di solidificazione a gradiente. Il comportamento<br />
in solidificazione è stato caratterizzato mediante analisi termica. Per mezzo di curve di<br />
raffreddamento, si è determinato il tempo di solidificazione e l’evoluzione della<br />
microstruttura. La relazione tra la microstruttura e le proprietà meccaniche è stata<br />
determinata usando specifiche carte di correlazione indice di qualità – resistenza. Questo<br />
studio dimostra che le caratteristiche microstrutturali, in particolare i grani aciculari ad<br />
alto tenore di ferro indicati come β-Al5FeSi, e le proprietà meccaniche sono<br />
marcatamente condizionate dai differenti percorsi preparativi. La velocità di<br />
raffreddamento esercita una significativa influenza sulla morfologia microstrutturale e<br />
sui componenti intermetallici che si sviluppano durante la solidificazione, influenzando<br />
così direttamente le proprietà di resistenza a trazione.<br />
12 - Metallurgical Science and Technology
INTRODUCTION<br />
The mechanical properties of cast aluminium alloys are very sensitive to<br />
composition, metallurgy and heat treatment, the casting process and the<br />
formation of defects during mould filling and solidification. The coarseness<br />
of the microstructure and the type of phases that evolve during solidification<br />
are fundamental in affecting the mechanical behaviour of the material. The<br />
mechanical properties obtained from gradient solidified samples are assumed<br />
to represent the upper performance limits of a particular alloy, due to the<br />
low level of defects obtained from the favourable melting and solidification<br />
procedure.<br />
Different processing routes offer different qualities and soundness of<br />
commercial components. The true potential of most alloys is seldom<br />
approached, and there exists a lack of data in the literature describing the<br />
variations in microstructure and related mechanical properties of alloy EN<br />
AC 43100. The present investigation was therefore carried out in order to<br />
Fig. 1: Fan blade cast in sand- and gravity moulds.<br />
13 - Metallurgical Science and Technology<br />
elucidate and assess the influence of the casting<br />
process and resultant variations of microstructure<br />
on the mechanical properties, by extracting tensile<br />
specimens from Al-10%Si-0.4%Mg commercial cast<br />
components manufactured by two different casting<br />
methods; sand and gravity die casting. In addition,<br />
the inherent strength potential of this casting alloy<br />
will be investigated by manufacturing tensile test<br />
specimens using gradient solidification technology.<br />
The mechanical properties which have been<br />
measured in this work are: ultimate tensile strength,<br />
yield strength and fracture elongation. The<br />
microstructural features that have been evaluated<br />
are the secondary dendrite arm spacing (SDAS),<br />
pore fraction and precipitated phases such as the<br />
length of the iron-rich β-phase, Al 5 FeSi.<br />
MATERIALS AND<br />
EXPERIMENTS<br />
Cast component<br />
The components that have been studied are fan<br />
blades, as shown in figure 1, which are produced<br />
commercially in a great variety of shapes and sizes,<br />
and by different casting methods. This particular<br />
component is considered to be of interest to study<br />
and analyse due to the widespread use of different<br />
casting methods to manufacture fan blades, which<br />
in this case were manufactured by sand mouldand<br />
gravity die casting.<br />
The locations of the specimens extracted for study<br />
are shown in figure 1; from the top (T), middle<br />
(M) and bottom (B) parts of the fan blade. These<br />
locations were chosen due to their different<br />
solidification times (i.e. thicknesses), which results<br />
in different coarseness of the microstructure,<br />
intermetallic phases and defects.<br />
Cast alloy<br />
Table 1: Chemical composition of the casting alloy<br />
Composition Elements (wt. %)<br />
The commercial blades and specimens produced<br />
by gradient solidification experiments were cast<br />
using alloy EN AC 43100. The standard<br />
composition of the alloy and the actual<br />
composition are given in table 1. Strontium was<br />
Alloy Standard Si Fe Cu Mn Mg Zn Ti Cr Ni Al<br />
EN AC-43100 SS-EN 1706 9.0-11.0 0.55 0.10 0.45 0.20-0.45 0.10 0.15 - 0.05 Bal.<br />
EN AC-43100 Actual sample 9.96 0.47 0.11 0.25 0.35 0.097 0.018 0.01 0.01 Bal.
added in the form of Al-10%Sr master alloy at a<br />
level of 150- 200 ppm.<br />
Sand and gravity die casting<br />
The sand moulds used were made by hand. As a<br />
pattern, a fan blade cast in a gravity mould was<br />
used, which is as already mentioned, one of the<br />
methods normally used to manufacture this size<br />
and type of fan blade. The sand mould consisted<br />
of chemical bonded sand.<br />
Gradient solidification<br />
The same alloy as that used for the sand and gravity<br />
die cast components, shown in table 1, was cast<br />
into rods for further solidification studies<br />
in the gradient solidification equipment. The<br />
gradient solidification technique allows the<br />
production of a high quality material with a low<br />
content of oxide films, porosity and shrinkage<br />
related defects, and produces a homogenous and<br />
A)<br />
well-fed microstructure throughout the entire specimen. In this work a<br />
resistance-heated furnace with an electrically driven elevator was used, see<br />
figure 2a. Three different growth velocities, v, were used, 0.03 mm/s, 0.3<br />
mm/s and 3 mm/s, which correspond respectively to an SDAS of <strong>about</strong> 50,<br />
20 and 7 µm. At each velocity, three specimens were made. The specimens<br />
cast in the gradient solidification equipment were protected by argon in<br />
order to avoid oxidation.<br />
Thermal analysis<br />
In order to study the thermal history of the solidified components,<br />
thermocouples were inserted at three different positions in the sand cast<br />
fan blade, as indicated in the picture in figure 1. To record the cooling curves<br />
a data acquisition device from National Instruments was used. In each of<br />
the sand moulds three thermocouples were placed. The thermocouples<br />
were of S-type, which means that the different materials in the thermocouple<br />
wires are platinum and platinum-rhodium (90Pt-10Rh). When manufacturing<br />
the thermocouples, the wires are inserted in a two-hole Al 2 O 3 -tube to<br />
separate the wires, which are connected to a plug. The thermocouples<br />
were protected from the molten metal by a quartz glass tube. The maximum<br />
operating temperature for the S-type thermocouple is over 1500°C [1].<br />
The recording rig is illustrated in figure 2b.<br />
B)<br />
Fig. 2: . Illustration of the instruments that have been used during the investigation. While a) demonstrates the gradient solidification equipment,<br />
b) presents the data acquisition rig that is connected to the sand moulds.<br />
14 - Metallurgical Science and Technology
RESULTS OF THE<br />
MICROSTRUCTURE AND<br />
MECHANICAL PROPERTIES<br />
INVESTIGATION<br />
Since specimens were extracted from fan blades<br />
with different thickness and at different sections<br />
it was necessary to machine them in order to<br />
obtain specimens suitable for tensile testing. The<br />
gradient solidified specimens have also been<br />
prepared in the same manner, and the dimensions<br />
of the samples used for tensile testing are shown<br />
in figure 3. In order to analyse the microstructure<br />
and measure the different microstructural features,<br />
a light microscope, image processing software and<br />
a scanning electron microscope, SEM, were used.<br />
Microstructure development<br />
The microstructure coarseness is defined as the secondary dendrite arm<br />
spacing, SDAS, which is also a function of the local solidification time, and<br />
quantifies the scale of the microstructure and its constituents. Examining<br />
the microstructure of specimens from both sand and gravity die casting, it<br />
has been observed that there is a wide scattering of SDAS and consequently<br />
variations of sizes and shapes of the intermetallic compounds within the<br />
same component. The needle-shaped β-phase, Al 5 FeSi also seems to coexist<br />
with the α-phase, Al 15 (Fe,Mn) 3 Si 2 , which has the morphology of Chinese<br />
script. As depicted in figure 4, the dendrites are equiaxed and the eutectic<br />
is finely modified. Comparing the microstructure formations, it can be noticed<br />
that in the case of gravity die casting the microstructure is finer, due to the<br />
higher cooling rate. Furthermore, the different coarsenesses of<br />
microstructure, the phases and their morphologies are comparable to the<br />
sand cast microstructure.<br />
It is relevant to note that even if Mn has been added to the alloy to act as<br />
A) B)<br />
Fig. 3: A schematic illustration of the tensile specimen (dimensions in mm).<br />
Fig. 4: . a) Illustration of the microstructure of a gravity die cast specimen while b) shows a sand cast microstructure. The black spot is a pore.<br />
<br />
<br />
15 - Metallurgical Science and Technology<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
an Fe-corrector and to promote the formation of<br />
Chinese script, see table 1, iron-rich Al 5 FeSi-needles<br />
are still formed. These needles act as local stress<br />
raisers in the matrix and are considered to be<br />
deleterious for the mechanical performance, which<br />
is why their formation and growth should be taken<br />
into consideration and as much as possible<br />
suppressed.<br />
In order to understand the local variations in<br />
microstructure, and to understand the formation<br />
sequences and development of constituent phases<br />
in the sand cast component, thermal analysis was<br />
implemented. When manufacturing the sand cast<br />
fan blades at the foundry, data for the cooling<br />
curves was recorded. In each of the sand moulds,<br />
three thermocouples were used, as shown in figure 1.
With this composition, see table 1, and casting<br />
technique, three different cooling curves have been<br />
obtained and are presented in figure 5a. The figure<br />
also shows that there exists clear variations in local<br />
solidification times which are directly related to<br />
the variations in component thickness, see also<br />
table 2. These variations in cooling time lead to<br />
major local differences in microstructures which<br />
affect the tensile performance of the cast<br />
components. The SDAS for the sand cast and<br />
gravity die cast component varied between 47-61<br />
µm and 20-45 µm respectively.<br />
Figure 5b shows that the freezing range is<br />
approximately between 595°C and 545°C. From<br />
the different cooling curves it is possible to see at<br />
which temperature and time the dendritic network<br />
starts to grow, at which temperature and time the<br />
eutectic starts to grow and also the total<br />
solidification time, from pouring the melt until the<br />
fraction solid has reached 100%.<br />
When the value of the derivative exceeds zero,<br />
figure 5b, the temperature is actually increasing<br />
due to the release of latent heat due to phase<br />
transformations. This is most evident in the case<br />
where a positive derivative is observed at <strong>about</strong><br />
<br />
A) B)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Mechanical properties<br />
The results of the tensile tests from the<br />
commercial fan blades and the laboratory<br />
prepared samples are shown in the diagrams in<br />
590°C when the dendritic network starts to grow. The next positive value<br />
of the derivative appears when the eutectic starts to grow, at <strong>about</strong> 570°C.<br />
When the temperature is around 550°C precipitations of a complex eutectic<br />
with intermetallics and a hardening phase such as Mg 2 Si starts to precipitate<br />
from the remaining melt. From the different thermocouples the following<br />
solidification times have been determined:<br />
Table 2. Solidification times for the different parts<br />
of the sand cast fan blade.<br />
Thermocouple Thinnest part Mid part Bottom<br />
(T) (M) part (B)<br />
Solidification time (s) 260 470 610<br />
Material thickness (mm) 12 20 28<br />
Examining the gradient solidified specimens, a significant discrepancy between<br />
the different solidification rates is observed. The higher the cooling rate<br />
the finer the microstructure, as illustrated in figure 6. The iron-rich<br />
β-phase Al 5 FeSi is found to be very short and very well dispersed for the<br />
two highest solidification velocities; 3 and 0.3 mm/s, with a corresponding<br />
SDAS ≈ 7 and 23 µm respectively, in comparison to the lowest velocity<br />
0.03 mm/s, with SDAS ≈ 47 µm, where long iron-bearing phases were found<br />
randomly distributed in the eutectic regions.<br />
Fig. 5: The thermal history of the sand cast component is registered in figure a) while in b) an analysis of the cooling curve<br />
obtained from the bottom section is performed.<br />
figure 7. The two different casting methods are compared in figure 7a, where<br />
each point represents a different position on the fan blade. A wide scatter<br />
in data is clearly observed but it can be noticed that the properties of the<br />
thinner parts seem to approach higher combinations of stress and strain<br />
values.<br />
16 - Metallurgical Science and Technology
In order to simulate the processes of the cast components, tensile test<br />
samples of the same alloy and corresponding microstructural coarseness<br />
have been produced by using gradient solidification. By producing a more<br />
homogenous microstructure with a lower level of defects, the material’s<br />
inherent potential was revealed, see figure 7b. The scatter in data in figure<br />
7b is ascribed to different levels of defects, and the higher stress-strain<br />
A) B)<br />
<br />
Fig. 6: Phases and microstructures for a) SDAS = 47 µm obtained at 0.03 mm/s and b) SDAS = 7 µm obtained at 3 mm/s.<br />
A) B)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
µ<br />
µ<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Fig. 7: The graph in a) illustrates the ultimate tensile strength and elongation to fracture for the gravity die and sand casting specimens where B is<br />
the bottom (thickest) section, M the middle and T the top (thinnest) part of the blade. The graph in b) presents the tensile properties for the<br />
gradient solidified specimens with a range of cooling rates.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
17 - Metallurgical Science and Technology<br />
<br />
combinations are the limits for what this alloy<br />
might perform under ideal conditions.<br />
When quantifying the SDAS, five measurements<br />
were taken at three randomly chosen positions of<br />
the specimen. From these data a mean value was<br />
calculated. At high solidification rates the SDAS<br />
µ<br />
µ<br />
µ
appears to be very small and the microstructure<br />
has been found to be more uniform. As noticed,<br />
the overall effect of obtaining a small SDAS is an<br />
improvement in both ductility and tensile strength,<br />
see figure 8.<br />
When measuring the length of the iron-rich Al 5 FeSi<br />
needles (β-phase), the 15 longest needles observed<br />
in the microstructure were measured, considering<br />
the entire cross-section area of the sample, and a<br />
mean value was assessed. It should be mentioned<br />
that the needles were not chemically analyzed, but<br />
<br />
<br />
A) B)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
µ<br />
µ<br />
µ<br />
µ<br />
µ<br />
<br />
µ<br />
<br />
<br />
were identified according to their morphologies and colours. A correlation<br />
was found between the length of the β-phase and the mechanical properties.<br />
An increase in needle length results in a reduction of tensile strength and<br />
elongation as can be seen in figure 9. Note that the iron-bearing β-phase<br />
was too short to be measured or not present at all in the specimen solidified<br />
at a rate of 3 mm/s, SDAS = 7 µm. It is also seen that even if these needles<br />
are relatively shorter in some cases than in corresponding samples, they<br />
exhibited lower properties. The premature fractures must therefore be<br />
due to other defects such as oxide film inclusions or other brittle and<br />
undesirable phases such as Al 8 Mg 3 FeSi 6 . These intermetallics are harmful to<br />
the mechanical properties since cracking of these phases reduces the ductility,<br />
<br />
Fig. 8: The graphs a) and b) illustrate the influence of SDAS on the tensile properties.<br />
A) B)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
µ<br />
µ<br />
µ<br />
µ<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
µ<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
18 - Metallurgical Science and Technology<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
µ<br />
µ<br />
µ<br />
µ<br />
µ<br />
<br />
<br />
µ<br />
Fig. 9: The influence of the β-phase needle length on a) ultimate tensile strength and b) the elongation to fracture.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
µ<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
µ<br />
µ<br />
µ<br />
µ
µ<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
µ<br />
µ<br />
µ<br />
µ<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
µ<br />
Fig. 10: This graph shows the relation between the β-phase length and the SDAS.<br />
and their formation reduces the Mg available in the melt to form Mg 2 Si<br />
which has a hardening effect and improves both the yield and ultimate<br />
tensile strengths.<br />
Generally, larger SDAS is associated with lower cooling rates and also with<br />
longer β-phase needles. The local solidification time influences the growth<br />
of the intermetallics that develop and grow during the solidification process,<br />
and hence a relation between SDAS and the β-phase length is observed as<br />
shown in figure 10.<br />
When a tensile sample contains pores it is reasonable to assume that the<br />
region of porosity will yield first due to the reduced load bearing area<br />
concentrating the stress near the voids. The area fraction of porosity was<br />
determined by measuring the area just below and at the fracture surface.<br />
<br />
A) B)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
µ<br />
µ<br />
µ<br />
µ<br />
µ<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Fig. 11: The graphs a) and b) illustrate the influence of porosity on the tensile properties.<br />
<br />
19 - Metallurgical Science and Technology<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The first mentioned was measured by an image<br />
analyzer and the latter was photographed and<br />
observed by scanning electron microscopy, SEM.<br />
This method enables an examination of the<br />
distribution and size of the pores.<br />
In the present study, it has been observed that the<br />
cooling rate, SDAS in this case, seem to govern<br />
the length as well as the percentage area fraction<br />
of porosity to some extent, see figure 11. It appears<br />
that a reduction in SDAS results in smaller average<br />
pore size and a reduced area fraction of porosity.<br />
It is obvious that as the solidification time is low,<br />
less time will therefore be available for the diffusion<br />
of the hydrogen into the interdendritic regions<br />
which results in small sizes and fraction of pores.<br />
But comparing the porosity formation, the gradient<br />
solidified samples with SDAS ~ 23 µm are<br />
associated with largest percentage area fraction<br />
of porosity which might be due to the arrestment<br />
of premature pores as they become entrapped by<br />
the advancing solidification front.<br />
The discrepancy could be derived from the theory<br />
that involves the harmfulness of the oxide films,<br />
which suggests that when an oxide particle is<br />
approached by the solidification front, the particle<br />
experiences the hydrogen-rich environment<br />
produced by the rejection of gas from the<br />
advancing solid. Furthermore, the access of gas by<br />
diffusion into the air pocket in the gap of the oxide<br />
particles, the pore will start to form and grow. As<br />
the freezing rate is slow and the particle is poorly<br />
wetted by the melt, time will therefore be available<br />
for more hydrogen to diffuse resulting in pore<br />
expansion and growth.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
µ<br />
µ<br />
µ<br />
µ<br />
µ
In the case of the larger SDAS ~ 47 µm, it is<br />
therefore reasonable to assume that due the slow<br />
cooling conditions many air pockets formed within<br />
the liquid or due to interaction with oxide particles<br />
have been driven in front of the solidified front<br />
without being engulfed and in that case not been<br />
detected in the gradient solidified specimens due<br />
to the solidification mode. Another reason might<br />
be the longer time available for the hydrogen to<br />
diffuse and move in front of solid-liquid interface<br />
out of the sample into the surrounding<br />
environment.<br />
The scatter in the data is too great to derive any<br />
clear correlation between porosity level and the<br />
tensile strength and ultimate elongation, see figure<br />
11 a and b. According to literature, it is stated [2]<br />
that the static tensile properties such as ultimate<br />
tensile strength, yield strength and elongation to<br />
A) B)<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
Generally, the mechanical properties of metals are<br />
widely influenced by their microstructures. When<br />
defining the microstructure many parameters have<br />
to be taken into account, and these include among<br />
others the secondary dendrite arm spacing, the<br />
size and shape of precipitated phases such as silicon<br />
and iron-bearing phases, grain size, porosity, etc.<br />
In this investigation, many of the parameters<br />
mentioned above have been measured and<br />
correlated to the mechanical properties.<br />
Constituents that may have deleterious effect on<br />
the mechanical properties are defects such as<br />
oxide films or undesired phases and inclusions.<br />
A comparison of the results of the tensile testing<br />
with the casting method and the corresponding<br />
fracture, were all decreased with an increased degree of porosity. On the<br />
contrary, according to [3-7], the reduction in tensile properties has almost<br />
no correlation with the average volume fraction of porosity. In fact, the<br />
decrease in tensile properties was attributed to the length and/or the area<br />
fraction of defects in the fracture surface. Development of a high fraction<br />
of porosity may also be due to Fe in the melt. The long, needle-shaped iron<br />
intermetallic phase formed is expected to cause severe feeding difficulties<br />
during solidification. The morphology of the β-phase blocks the interdendritic<br />
flow channels, which is why it is proposed that higher iron contents in the<br />
alloy are associated with higher levels of porosity.<br />
SEM examination was also performed in order to study what kinds of pores<br />
are frequently found on the fracture surfaces in this work. Figure 12a<br />
illustrates a pore seen in a sand cast specimen and 12b is seen in a gradient<br />
solidified specimen at a solidification rate of 3 mm/s.<br />
Worth to indicate is that the melt hydrogen content has not been measured<br />
and assumed in this case to be constant for all the alloys since they have<br />
been produced under similar conditions.<br />
Fig. 12: Illustration of pores. a) Showing sphericity of a possible gas pore b) The cavity is observed at the edge of the<br />
fractured surface shows a possible gas-shrinkage pore.<br />
specimens with three different solidification rates obtained by gradient<br />
solidification shows clearly that the tensile behaviour and production method<br />
is related by three different stress-strain curves. The material exhibiting<br />
SDAS ≈ 7 µm results in the highest stress-strain combinations as shown in<br />
the diagram in figure 13. The main reason for this behaviour is the finer<br />
microstructure, a more homogeneous distribution of the intermetallic phases<br />
and lower levels of porosity. Even though there are no specimens with<br />
corresponding SDAS extracted from commercial components available in<br />
this study, this data clearly shows the inherent potential strength of the<br />
alloy.<br />
The stress-strain values for the sand cast specimens follow the curve for<br />
SDAS = 47 µm (obtained by gradient solidification), but fracture occurs at<br />
lower stress and strain levels, see figure 13. The stress-strain curve for<br />
SDAS = 23 µm (by gradient solidification) corresponds well to the stressstrain<br />
values of the gravity die cast specimens.<br />
The reason why the sand and gravity die cast specimens fractured much<br />
earlier than the gradient solidified specimens, and exhibited different<br />
20 - Metallurgical Science and Technology
µ<br />
µ<br />
µ<br />
µ<br />
µ<br />
µ<br />
µ<br />
µ<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Fig. 13: This graph shows tensile test curves for the gradient solidified specimens and<br />
includes mechanical properties data for the gravity die and sand cast specimens.<br />
combinations of strength and fracture elongation values may be due to the<br />
formation of brittle and coarse intermetallics such as the iron-bearing<br />
β-phase and an inhomogeneous microstructure. Even if similar SDAS has<br />
been obtained from the gradient solidification equipment, the variations in<br />
the β-phase needles, local coarsenesses of microstructures and sizes of<br />
intermetallics are likely to be different due to microsegregation in the<br />
castings. Segregation of elements is likely to occur in castings and this will<br />
affect the development and solidification sequences of the microstructure<br />
and lead to local variations in mechanical properties. At the thinner part of<br />
the fan blades the β-phase needles are likely to be short and have no time<br />
to grow and coarsen as is the case in thicker parts where the local iron<br />
<br />
A) B)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
µ<br />
µ<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
21 - Metallurgical Science and Technology<br />
level might also be different. It has also been shown<br />
that a finer microstructure with smaller SDAS is<br />
beneficial for the mechanical properties. A finer<br />
microstructure means larger areas of grain<br />
boundary leading to more difficulties for<br />
continuation of slip and dislocation movement<br />
during deformation, hence yielding stronger alloys.<br />
A simple tool that might be used to predict the<br />
impact of changes in the chemical composition,<br />
solidification rates and routes, microstructure and<br />
heat treatment on the tensile performance is by<br />
implementing a quality index, Q. Its practical value<br />
originates from the fact that the mechanical<br />
“quality” of an alloy is expressed by a single<br />
numerical parameter, whose value can be read off<br />
a quality index chart or calculated through a simple<br />
equation relating the elongation to fracture, s , the f<br />
ultimate tensile strength, UTS, and d, which is an<br />
empirical parameter chosen to be around 150 MPa<br />
for EN AC 43100 (Al-7%Si-0.4%Mg) to make Q<br />
more or less independent of the yield strength of<br />
the alloy, as seen in equations 1-2, [8-10]:<br />
Q = UTS + d * log (100*s ) (1)<br />
f<br />
n<br />
σ = Kε<br />
(2)<br />
where σ is the true flow stress, K is the alloy’s<br />
strength coefficient, ε is the true plastic strain and<br />
n the strain hardening exponent.<br />
In order to produce the charts in figure 14, a mean<br />
value for the strength coefficient, K, has been<br />
calculated. For the commercial cast components,<br />
figure 14a, K is approximately 410 MPa and for<br />
the gradient solidified materials K is around 430<br />
MPa, figure 14b. The strain hardening exponent, n,<br />
is numerically equal to the necking onset strain<br />
Fig. 14: A quality index chart for the alloy studied obtained for gravity- and sand cast samples is presented in a) while b) represents the gradient<br />
solidified specimens. The mean value of the strength coefficient is a little higher for the gradient solidified specimens.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
µ<br />
µ<br />
µ
and can be used to define the relative ductility<br />
parameter, q, see equation 3.<br />
q = s f /n (3)<br />
Defining q = 1 means the onset of necking<br />
represents samples that fail either at the onset of<br />
necking or beyond, while q < 1 identifies lower<br />
quality or less ductile samples. For instance q =<br />
0.5, 0.2, 0.1 identifies samples that fail at 50%, 20%<br />
and 10% of their maximum uniform strain,<br />
respectively.<br />
As observed, the points corresponding to<br />
SDAS = 52 µm are located near the bottom of<br />
the chart, which may be due to their coarser<br />
CONCLUSIONS<br />
As an outcome from the current investigation, the<br />
dendritic cell size, SDAS, and the length of ironbearing<br />
phase whether as needles or Chinese<br />
script, governs the tensile strength and ductility of<br />
Al-Si-Mg alloys. The early fracture of sand and<br />
gravity die cast specimen can be related to the<br />
length of the iron-bearing phase, oxide films<br />
entrapment, and inhomogeneous microstructure<br />
and to the Si particle size and morphology, which<br />
determine the rate of particle cracking with the<br />
applied strain.<br />
• A finer microstructure, small and well<br />
distributed iron-rich compounds and low levels<br />
of porosity exert a beneficial impact on the<br />
resulting mechanical properties.<br />
• The locally increased levels of iron due to<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />
REFERENCES<br />
1. Metals Handbook; ASM International, 1998, pp.<br />
663-665.<br />
2. M. Avalle, G. Belingardi, M.P. Cavatorta and R.<br />
Doglione, International Journal of Fatigue Vol. 24<br />
, (2002), pp. 1-9.<br />
3. C.H. Cáceres and B.I. Selling , Materials Science<br />
and Engineering A, Vol. 220, Issues 1-2, (1996),<br />
pp. 109-116.<br />
4. M. Harada, T. Suzuki and I. Fukui , Journal of the<br />
Japan foundrymen´s society Vol. 55, No. 12,<br />
(1983), pp. 47-50.<br />
microstructure and the length of the β-phase. As the strength of the gravity<br />
die cast specimens increases, the data points shift toward the upper right<br />
corner.<br />
Regarding the gradient solidified samples, the data points for the<br />
SDAS = 7 µm specimens, with the finer microstructure, exhibit the highest<br />
values of Q and q. These values seem to be the only ones that reach the<br />
limit imposed by the necking line q = 1.<br />
As the SDAS and the level of deleterious microstructural compounds are<br />
decreased, the strength and ductility of the alloy is increased and so does<br />
the Q, allowing for a possible comparison between different alloys and<br />
processing routes. Furthermore, the Si particles, playing a role as reinforcing<br />
phases, decrease in size and the shape becomes more fibrous, which has an<br />
overall beneficial effect on the mechanical properties.<br />
possible segregations might have resulted in longer and larger fractions<br />
of β-phase needles. The main reason for the remarkable reduction of<br />
the mechanical performance of commercial components is proposed<br />
to be due to the presence of the locally induced stresses by the needles<br />
which break, link and propagate the cracks in an unstable manner. The<br />
higher the solidification rate the shorter the length of the needles and<br />
the sounder the material.<br />
• The gradient solidification method shows that the EN AC 43100 alloy<br />
used for commercial cast components processed by sand and gravity<br />
die casting, has an improvement potential to provide sounder castings<br />
with substantial ductility.<br />
• The addition of Mn did not alter the morphology of iron-bearing βphase<br />
into a more compact Chinese script. Instead, these iron<br />
intermetallics seem to be coexisting in the microstructure.<br />
• Porosity is not found to be the primary parameter controlling the tensile<br />
strength and ductility, but it is worth bearing in mind that the reduction<br />
of the load bearing area generally has a harmful influence on the overall<br />
properties.<br />
The authors acknowledge Johan and Jan Tegnemo at Mönsterås Metall AB for their invaluable help and support for making the<br />
experiments in the foundry and Nordic Industrial Fund for the financial support within the Nordic Project STALPK.<br />
5. M.K. Surappa, E. Blank and J.C. Jaquet, Scripta Metallurgica, Vol. 20, No. 9,<br />
(1986), pp. 1281-1286.<br />
6. J.G. Conley, J. Huang, J. Asada and K. Akiba, One Hundred Third Annual<br />
Meeting of the American Foundrymen’s Society; Rosemont, IL; USA, (1998).<br />
pp. 737-742.<br />
7. C.H . Cáceres, Scripta Materialia Vol. 32 No.11, (1995), pp. 1851-1856.<br />
8. C.H. Cáceres, I.L. Svensson, J.A. Taylor, International Journal of Cast Metals<br />
Research, Vol. 15, No. 5, (2003), pp. 531-543.<br />
9. C.H. Cáceres, International Journal of Cast Metals Research, Vol.12, (2000),<br />
pp. 367-375.<br />
10. M. Drouzy, S. Jacob and M.Richard, AFS International Cast Metals Journal,<br />
Vol. 5, No. 2, (1980), pp. 43-50.<br />
22 - Metallurgical Science and Technology
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HIGH<br />
TEMPERATURE WORKABILITY OF ZM21<br />
AND AZ31 MAGNESIUM ALLOYS<br />
1 M. El Mehtedi, 1 L. Balloni, 1 S. Spigarelli, 1 E. Evangelista, 2 G. Rosen, 3 B.H.Lee, C.S.Lee<br />
1 Dipartimento di Meccanica, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy<br />
2 ALUBIN, Kiryat Bialik, Israel<br />
3 Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Pohang University, Pohang, Korea<br />
Abstract<br />
High temperature regime, 300-450°C for Mg-Al-Zn alloys, is currently used in primary<br />
processing, such as rolling and extrusion, as well as for secondary operation like forging.<br />
The knowledge of temperature and strain rate proper combination (processing window)<br />
as well as the microstructure evolution occurring during hot deformation clarifies the<br />
relationships between forming variables and final properties of components. Numerous<br />
data on AZ31 and few other Mg-Al alloys, produced by laboratory testing, are available<br />
in the scientific and technical literature. The ZM21, Mg-2Zn-1Mn, by contrast, is<br />
characterized by absolute lack of scientific data. In the alloy the addition of manganese,<br />
by suppressing the formation of beta phase, increases the solidus temperature that<br />
results in the larger processing window than in AZ31. The benefit requires extensive<br />
analysis aimed at optimizing the deformation variables that affect the microstructure<br />
refinement under dynamic and static recrystallization. The high-temperature plastic<br />
deformation and the microstructure evolution of the ZM21 were thus investigated in<br />
the temperature range between 200 and 500°C and results were analysed and compared<br />
with those of a conventional heat-treated AZ31.<br />
23 - Metallurgical Science and Technology<br />
Riassunto<br />
Il regime delle alte temperature 300-450°C, è comunemente<br />
usato per le operazioni primarie di deformazione plastica,<br />
come la laminazione e l’estrusione, come pure per quelle<br />
secondarie come la forgiatura o lo stampaggio delle leghe<br />
Mg-Al-Zn. La conoscenza della combinazione adatta<br />
temperatura-velocità di deformazione (finestra di processo)<br />
e della evoluzione della microstruttura fa luce sulle relazioni<br />
tra variabili di deformazione e proprietà dei componenti.<br />
Numerosi dati, ottenuti con prove di compressione o<br />
torsione, sono disponibili sulla lega AZ31 e su pochi altre<br />
leghe della classe Mg-Al. Sulla lega ZM21 (Mg-2Zn-1Mn)<br />
non sono invece disponibili dati scientifici. Nella lega<br />
l’addizione del Mn sopprime la formazione della fase beta<br />
ed aumenta la temperatura del solidus, producendo una<br />
finestra di processo più ampia di quella dell’AZ31. Questi<br />
aspetti richiedono analisi approfondite sono rivolte<br />
all’ottimizzazione delle variabili di deformazione che poi<br />
governano l’affinamento della microstruttura per effetto<br />
della ricristallizzazione sia dinamica che statica. La<br />
deformazione plastica ad alta temperatura e l’evoluzione<br />
della microstruttura della lega ZM21 sono state analizzate<br />
nell’intervallo di temperatura 200-500°C e i risultati sono<br />
confrontati con quelli di una lega convenzionale trattata<br />
termicamente.
1. INTRODUCTION<br />
Lightweight constructions are becoming more and<br />
more important for the automotive industries due<br />
to increase of fuel prices and legislative<br />
requirements like CAFÉ in the US, and the directive<br />
or the control of CO 2 emissions in the EU [1,2].<br />
Magnesium alloys for their unique combination of<br />
light weight, high specific strength and stiffness and<br />
high recycling capability are candidate to replace<br />
steel, iron and, in some cases, also aluminum parts.<br />
The growing interest in magnesium alloys is<br />
expected to increase in the next years [3]. The<br />
use of components manufactured via die-, sand-,<br />
mould- and rheo-casting is fairly well introduced<br />
in a wide number of applications which are ranging<br />
from steering wheels, instrumental panels, gear box<br />
housing and even to hybrid engine blocks. The<br />
scenario for the automotive industry is that the<br />
use of magnesium alloys for many components,<br />
mainly as castings, is further expanding in the short<br />
term, whereas the application in body and chassis<br />
components, including sheet and extrusions, is<br />
anticipated in the medium term [4].<br />
A driving force for the introduction of wrought<br />
alloys is their property enhancement, since casting<br />
alloys are affected by porosity, which would be of<br />
particular importance for structural and crashrelevant<br />
parts. Initial applications for this category<br />
are expected for extrusions and forgings, to be<br />
followed by sheets. These requirements may<br />
address researches towards the modification of<br />
known alloys as well as the development of new<br />
ones aiming at improving both mechanical<br />
performances, also by ageing (T6), and high<br />
temperature stability. The growing interest in use<br />
of magnesium alloys is expected to increase in the<br />
next years, and to be sustained by research [5].<br />
From recent magnesium alloys conferences [6], the<br />
following items stand out as limiting or retarding<br />
factors for the use of wrought alloys: 1) poor cold<br />
forming properties; 2) limited number of wrought<br />
alloys and lack of processing data. As far as the<br />
item 1) is concerned, it is important to note that<br />
magnesium alloys are difficult to work at low<br />
temperature (
EXPERIMENTAL<br />
The AZ31 experimental result data belong to the authors’ wide database<br />
obtained in the last 3 years by testing a batch of AZ31 with different initial<br />
microstructure: ingot, extruded, heat treated, overaged. These investigations<br />
aimed at clarifying the microstructure features that significantly affect the<br />
high temperature deformation of the alloy; the data were partly published<br />
[11,12] and used to identify the processing window (strain rate and<br />
temperature conditions) that is successfully used for industrial forming<br />
operations. Warm forming experiments were also carried out to assess the<br />
AZ31 sheet formability [13]. The present data were obtained by testing<br />
the specimens machined from rolled AZ31 heat treated at 385°C for 14 h,<br />
at the Pohang University.<br />
The ZM21 alloy was produced and extruded by Alubin, Israel. The specimens<br />
for torsion testing, with gauge radius R, and length L, 5 and 10 mm respectively,<br />
were machined from extruded rods. Torsion tests were carried out in air<br />
on a computer-controlled torsion machine, under equivalent strain rates<br />
ranging from 10 -3 to 5 s -1 and temperatures from 200°C to 400°C. Specimens<br />
were heated 1°C/s by induction coils and maintained 5 minutes before<br />
torsion to stabilize the testing temperature that was measured by<br />
thermocouple in contact with the gauge section. Specimens just after the<br />
fracture were rapidly quenched with water jets to avoid microstructure<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
The initial microstructure of the alloys before testing is displayed in Figure<br />
1. The heat-treated AZ31 exhibited an equiaxed and fine microstructure.<br />
The microstructure of the extruded ZM21 is composed by duplex grain<br />
size, the small and the large grains were 20 and 60 µm respectively.<br />
Figures 2 and 3 show typical equivalent stress vs. equivalent strain curves<br />
obtained by testing at 200 and 400°C the rolled and heat treated AZ31 and<br />
the extruded ZM21, respectively. The flow curves shape of the rolled AZ31<br />
does not differ appreciably from that observed in the cast [11,12]. At<br />
A) B)<br />
25 - Metallurgical Science and Technology<br />
modifications during slow cooling.<br />
The von Mises equivalent stress, σ, and equivalent<br />
strain, ε, were calculated using the relationships:<br />
σ =<br />
3 M<br />
( 3 + m'+<br />
n'<br />
)<br />
2 π R<br />
3<br />
2 π N R<br />
ε =<br />
2)<br />
3 L<br />
where N is the number of revolutions, M is the<br />
torque, m’ (strain rate sensitivity coefficient) at<br />
constant strain is ∂ log M / ∂ log N,<br />
•<br />
and n’(strain<br />
hardening coefficient) at constant strain rate is<br />
∂ log M / ∂ log N; at the peak stress, clearly n’=0.<br />
To reveal the microstructure, longitudinal sections<br />
at the periphery of the sample gauge, i.e. in the<br />
point where the strain and strain rates assumed<br />
the values calculated by equations 1) and 2), were<br />
investigated by means of optical microscopy.<br />
200°C, under all strain rates, the flow curves of<br />
both alloys exhibit well defined σ y , ~60 MPa for<br />
AZ31 and ~20 MPa for ZM21, a continuous<br />
increase of work hardening up to σ max , which is<br />
larger in AZ31, followed by fracture that in ZM21<br />
occurs at larger strain. At 400°C, AZ31 the flow<br />
curve, after yielding and very limited workhardening,<br />
gets a steady state region, typical<br />
behaviour of dynamic recovery (DRV), up to<br />
fracture. The ZM21 flow curves display yielding<br />
Fig. 1: Microstructure of the rolled and heat-treated AZ31 (a) and of the extruded ZM21 (b).<br />
1)
and rapid hardening up to σ peaks located at ε~0.7,<br />
irrespective of the different strain rates, followed<br />
by a continuous softening towards the fracture<br />
that occurs at e larger than in AZ31; at 400°C and<br />
strain rate 0.05 s -1 the maximum strain value is<br />
2.5. The flow curve exhibiting a peak followed by<br />
softening in stationary state is indicative of dynamic<br />
recrystallization (DRX) that nucleates in proximity<br />
of the peak producing new stable grains whose<br />
size controls the softening and the σ of stationary<br />
state.<br />
In the present instance, the absence of stationary<br />
state and the decrease of σ up to fracture may be<br />
indicative of three processes promoting the<br />
continuous softening: (i) the onset of DRX around<br />
the peak, producing new small grains, (ii) the fast<br />
new-grain growth at the critical size for (iii) crack<br />
nucleation and growth.<br />
A significant decrease in the strain to failure in<br />
torsion can be observed (Figure 4), in particular<br />
in the high-temperature region; an additional<br />
difference is the observation of a well defined<br />
yielding in ZM21, (Figure 3) i.e. of the presence of<br />
a short strain range without load increase, an effect<br />
A)<br />
<br />
B)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
A)<br />
B)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Fig. 3: Equivalent stress vs. equivalent strain curves obtained in torsion for<br />
ZM21 at 200 (a) and 400°C (b).<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
26 - Metallurgical Science and Technology<br />
Fig. 2: Equivalent stress vs. equivalent strain curves obtained in<br />
torsion for AZ31 at 200 (a) and 400°C (b).<br />
probably due to a sudden increase in the number of<br />
dislocations unpinned from their solute atmosphere<br />
(either Zn or Mn).<br />
The temperature and strain rate dependence of the<br />
peak stress are shown in Figure 5. The experimental<br />
data are well described by the equation:<br />
ε& = A[ sinh(<br />
ασ)<br />
] n<br />
exp( −Q<br />
/ RT)<br />
3)<br />
where A and α are material parameters, n is a<br />
constant, R is the gas constant, T is the absolute<br />
temperature, and Q is the apparent activation energy<br />
for high-temperature deformation process. In the<br />
AZ31 a best-fitting procedure gave α=0.017 MPa-1 and n= 4.4 for temperatures between 200°C and<br />
400°C. The activation energy, calculated by plotting<br />
sinh(as) as a function of 1/T, was Q=140 kJ/mol. The<br />
value is relatively close to the one of self-diffusion of<br />
Mg (135 kJ/mol) or for diffusion of Al in Mg (143 kJ/<br />
mol). In the case of the ZM21, α was close to 0.049<br />
MPa-1 , and n ranged between 2.6 and 4.4 (average<br />
n=3.3). The activation energy for high temperature<br />
deformation was close to 200 kJ/mol, higher than in<br />
the case of AZ31.
A) B)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Fig. 4: Equivalent strain to failure for AZ31 (a) and ZM21 (b).<br />
A) B)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
ασ<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Fig. 6: Zener-Hollomon parameter as a function of peak-flow stress for AZ31 and<br />
ZM21.<br />
27 - Metallurgical Science and Technology<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Fig. 5: Peak flow stress dependence on applied stress as a function of temperature for AZ31 (a) and ZM21 (b).<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
ασ<br />
α <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
ασ<br />
Figure 6 plots the Zener-Hollomon parameter, Z,<br />
defined as<br />
[ ( ) ] n<br />
sinh<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Z = ε&<br />
exp( Q / RT)<br />
= ασ<br />
4)<br />
as a function of peak stress, with Q= 170 kJ/mol<br />
and α=0.034 MPa-1 (mean values of those obtained<br />
experimentally for AZ31 and ZM21). Analysis of<br />
Figure 6 clearly demonstrates that the peak flow<br />
stresses are higher in the AZ31 than in the ZM21.<br />
Figure 7 shows typical microstructure of the AZ31<br />
quenched after torsion testing. At 200°C, and a<br />
strain rate of 10-2 s-1 , the structure is mostly<br />
composed by slightly elongated grains (Figure 7a),<br />
with very fine recrystallized grains on several grain<br />
boundaries. At 300°C, under the same strain rate,<br />
the recrystallized fraction is substantially higher<br />
than at the lower temperature, and the average<br />
size of the recrystallized grains is larger (Figure
A) B)<br />
C) D)<br />
Fig. 7: Microstructure of the AZ31 tested at: 200°C-10-2 s-1 (a) 300°C-10-2 s-1 (b) and 400°C- 1 s-1 (c); (d) 400°C-10-3 s-1 .<br />
7b). Fully recrystallization and localised grain<br />
growth at 400°C, in the high strain rate range,<br />
resulted in the presence of some large grains<br />
heavily deformed by twinning, albeit a relatively<br />
large fraction of the structure is composed by fine<br />
equiaxed grains. Under lower strain rate, the<br />
structure is composed by a homogeneous<br />
distribution of relatively coarse equiaxed grains<br />
(Figure 7d).<br />
The mechanism of dynamic recrystallization (DRX)<br />
has been analysed by McQueen and Konopleva<br />
[15]; twinning in fact takes place before the other<br />
mechanisms, except basal glide that occurs in<br />
favourably oriented grains. At low strains, twinning<br />
favourably reorients grains for slip. As deformation<br />
reaches a sufficiently high value, DRX starts where<br />
high misorientations have been created by<br />
accumulation of dislocations, i.e. where slip has<br />
occurred on several slip system (near grain<br />
boundaries and twins). The new fine grains form a<br />
mantle (or a “necklace”) along grain boundaries<br />
and deform more easily than the grain core, thus repeatedly undergoing<br />
recrystallization [12].<br />
Figure 8 shows typical micrographs of the microstructure of ZM21 tested<br />
in torsion. The structure, even at 300°C, is largely unrecrystallized, with<br />
elongated grains; at 400°C, the grains are mostly equiaxed, but elongated<br />
structures still persist. The strong decrease in flow stress after the peak<br />
should be attributed to the late onset (at strain close to ε=0.7-0.8) of<br />
recrystallization and coarsening phenomena, that in this alloy exhibit quite<br />
different kinetics than in the case of the AZ31. Only at the highest<br />
temperature (500°C), the microstructure underwent complete<br />
recrystallization and grain growth, a process that resulted in the presence<br />
of coarse (50 µm) grains.<br />
The above analysis gives some interesting preliminary indications on the<br />
high-temperature formability of the extruded ZM21 alloy. In particular:<br />
1. the intrinsic ductility, i.e. the equivalent failure strain in torsion, is lower<br />
in ZM21 than in AZ31;<br />
2. the fraction of recrystallized structure, at all the investigated<br />
temperatures, is lower in ZM21 than in AZ31;<br />
3. the maximum equivalent stress, i.e. the working load, is higher in AZ31<br />
than in ZM21; yielding has been observed in ZM21, thus suggesting a<br />
solute strengthening role played by either Zn or Mn;<br />
28 - Metallurgical Science and Technology
A)<br />
C)<br />
Fig. 8: Microstructure of the ZM21 tested at: 300°C-5 s-1 (a) 400°C- 5x10-2 s-1 (b) and 500°C- 5 s-1 (c).<br />
4. the different composition of the ZM21 enables the use of higher<br />
working temperature, up to 500°C, i.e. well above the upper limit<br />
allowed for AZ31. On the other hand, even though strain to failure is<br />
relatively high at 500°C, the microstructure undergoes extensive grain<br />
CONCLUSIONS<br />
The high temperature workability of the extruded ZM21 alloy has been<br />
investigated by torsion tests between 200 and 500°C. Both mechanical and<br />
microstructural results were compared with those observed in a rolled<br />
AZ31 alloy; the comparison indicated that the strain to fracture in torsion<br />
were significantly lower in ZM21 than in AZ31, even though in general in<br />
the former alloy the ductility exceeded the minimum allowable value of<br />
ε=1. These differences in mechanical response were attributed to a lower<br />
tendency to dynamic recrystallization; while in rolled AZ31 early dynamic<br />
recrystallization was observed at temperatures as low as 200°C,<br />
microstructural observations clearly suggested that in the extruded ZM21<br />
the lower limit for DRX was shifted toward significantly higher temperatures.<br />
B)<br />
29 - Metallurgical Science and Technology<br />
growth, that precludes the fine grain size that<br />
has been observed to be a prerequisite for<br />
optimum sheet formability.<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />
The authors greatly acknowledge the Ministries<br />
of Foreign Affairs of Italy and Korea who in the<br />
frame of “2004-06 Joint Scientific and Technological<br />
Research Program” promoted the research by<br />
funding the researchers’ mobility.<br />
The valid support of D. Ciccarelli in experimental<br />
activity has been appreciated.
REFERENCES<br />
1) CAFÉ, http:/www.nhtsa.dot.gov<br />
2) Communication from the Commission to the<br />
Council and European Parliament:<br />
Implementing the Community strategy to<br />
reduce CO emissions from cars. Third annual<br />
2<br />
report (reporting year2001), COM (2002)<br />
693.<br />
3) EU Directive on the End of Life of Vehicles,<br />
2000/53/EC.<br />
4) S. Schumann, Mat. Sci. Forum 488-489 (2005),<br />
1-8.<br />
5) Ya Zhang, X. Zeng, C. Lu, W. Ding, Y. Zhu, Mat.<br />
Sci. Forum, 488-489,(2005), 123.<br />
6) Magnesium Technology 2006, A.A. Luo et al,<br />
eds. TMS, 2006.<br />
7) F.J. Humphreys, M. Hatherly: Recrystallization<br />
and related annealing phenomena. Pergamon<br />
Press, Oxford, 1996.<br />
8) J. Koike, Mat. Sci.Forum, 419-422 (2003), 199.<br />
9) H. Utsunomiya, T. Sakai, S. Minamiguchi, H. Koh, Magnesium Technology<br />
2006, A.A. Luo et al. eds. TMS, 2006, 201.<br />
10) J. Bohlen, J. Swoistek, W.H. Sillekens, P.J. Vet, D. Letzig, K.U. Kainer,<br />
Magnesium Technology 2005, TMS, 2005, 241.<br />
11) S. Spigarelli, M. El Mehtedi, E. Evangelista, J. Kaneko, Metall.Sci.Techn. 23<br />
(2005) 11-17.<br />
12) S. Spigarelli, M. El Mehtedi, M. Cabibbo, E. Evangelista, J. Kaneko, A. Jäger,<br />
V. Gartnerova, mater. Sci.Eng. A 462 (2007), 197.<br />
13) A. Forcellese, M. El Mehtedi, M. Simoncini, S. Spigarelli, Key Engineering<br />
Materials 344 (2007) 31.<br />
14) S. Spigarelli, E. Evangelista, M. El Mehtedi, L. Balloni, Mechanical And<br />
Microstructural Aspects Of High Temperature Formability Of AZ31<br />
Sheets, Proceeding 10 ESAFORM 2007, Zaragoza, Spain, 1305.<br />
15) H.J. McQueen, E.V. Konopleva, in Magnesium Technology 2001, J. Hryn<br />
ed., TMS, 2001, p. 227.<br />
30 - Metallurgical Science and Technology
INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS<br />
To ensure that space can be provided for the publication of several papers in<br />
each issue of the Metallurgical Science and Technology, Authors are kindly<br />
requested, to limit their contributions to a maximum of fifteen typed pages<br />
prepared in accordance with the following instructions:<br />
1. Texts must be submitted on Word for Windows compatible CD in the<br />
following format: double line space, and divided into paragraphs; each page<br />
should contain 30-35 lines, each composed of 50-60 characters and spaces.<br />
Authors are also asked to supply a reserve copy on A4 paper in the same<br />
format to cover the possibility that their disc may not be legible.<br />
2. Each paragraph should be indented three spaces.<br />
3. Notes must be numbered and typed on separate sheets.<br />
4. All measurements must be expressed in ISO 1000-81 units (International<br />
System).<br />
5. Please set out the following details clearly at the end of the typescript: first<br />
name and surname, university department or firm where employed, full<br />
address and telephone number. This information will help the editorial staff<br />
to get in touch with you if necessary.<br />
6. A short summary should be provided (not more than 150 words). This<br />
should give an account of the scope of the paper and summarise its<br />
conclusions.<br />
7. Tables, graphs, and figures must be set out on separate sheets. Their position<br />
should be indicated in the text in the form “table 1”, “fig. 3”, etc. If data<br />
collected by other persons are used in their preparation, acknowledgement<br />
of the source should be made in a note at the foot of the table or figure<br />
concerned. The titles of tables, graphs, figures, etc. must provide a specific<br />
indication of their contents.<br />
All photographs should be supplied in their original form. Tables, graphs and<br />
figures are recommended in JPEG format (300 dpi) and in grey scale.<br />
8. Bibliographical references should be set out on a separate sheet or sheets<br />
in the order in which they appear in the text. The following rules must be<br />
followed:<br />
a) Authors’ names: surname of the first author, comma, initials, comma,<br />
initials and surnames of remaining authors; “and” between the final pair<br />
of authors; finished with full point.<br />
b) Article title: initial caps and lower case (except in German, where nouns<br />
are always capitalized); finished with full point.<br />
c) Journal name: underlined in the typescript; abbreviations may be used;<br />
initial caps; comma; issue number underlined followed by year in<br />
parentheses, comma; page number (without “p”), final full point.<br />
For book titles the style is similar as follows:<br />
a) Authors’ names: as for journals.<br />
b) Chapter title: as for article title.<br />
c) Book title: “In” followed by initials, surname of editor and “(Ed.)”, comma<br />
and then title underlined, comma.<br />
d) Publisher, comma, location, comma, year, comma, volume, part, etc., comma.<br />
e) Page number preceded by “p”, or “pp.” and followed by full point.<br />
Examples:<br />
Slatcher, S., and J.F. Knott. The ductile fracture of high strength steels. In D.<br />
Francois (Ed.), Advances in fracture mechanics, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1981,<br />
vol. I, pp. 201-207.<br />
Griffiths, J.R. and D.R.J. Owen. An elastic-plastic analysis for a notched bar in<br />
plane strain bending. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 19 (1971), 419-431.<br />
The authors are strongly recommended to submit their papers on a CD<br />
prepared using the Word for Windows programs, besides the written<br />
version.
ISSN 0393-6074