13.06.2013 Views

New Page

New Page

New Page

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

through the serpent in heaven, on earth<br />

and in paradise itself. Intercourse with<br />

the unclean spirit rendered unclean the<br />

heaven, the earth and the terrestrial paradise.<br />

The heaven became unclean since<br />

sin was found in God's angels, as Job<br />

says. The serpent so contaminated and<br />

polluted everything, the sun, the moon<br />

and the stars that for the same reason that<br />

we have to become ash, the heaven<br />

himself, along with the sun, the moon<br />

and the stars will have to be destroyed by<br />

fire on the day of judgement."88<br />

company of the unclean spirit, likewise the earth was<br />

contaminated, the heaven because sin was found in<br />

God's angels as it is written in Job four and 19.<br />

The sun, the moon, the stars are contaminated<br />

and obscured so much that they have to become dirt<br />

like us and consumed by fire. Indeed, hell, death and all<br />

diseases were introduced by him."89<br />

In the process of the interpretation of rebirth the typically Servetian idea that the renovation in the<br />

inner man is a simultaneously spiritual and physical process is leached out. With Dávid, on the contrary,<br />

Sozzini's spiritual notion of +creating new" is dominant, but the effort to blend the ideas of the two<br />

Antitrinitarian predecessors is clearly perceptible.<br />

A similar tendency can be observed while attending to another problem. How has it become<br />

necessary to be reborn for those who are in heaven since angels do not sin? -- Dávid asks on behalf of his<br />

predictable opponents. The answer, in keeping with Lelio Sozzini, but also tangentially related to Servet,<br />

is that while Adam's sin corrupted human nature, the fall of the first angels corrupted their nature. While,<br />

however, Brevis explicatio only briefly mentions that the Scripture is silent about the creation and fall of<br />

the angels, and says very little on their restoration, this silence was visibly problematic for the author of<br />

Rövid útmutatás, who visibly found it difficult to accept this silence and also the fact that this doctrine is<br />

hard to grasp: +If we do not understand how the angels were reconciled with God, we cannot know either<br />

when and how the angels were created and fell, thus it is no wonder we know so little about their<br />

reconciliation and that Christ being their head since the Scripture makes but brief mention of it. The<br />

conditions of man are rather and more openly explained and, therefore, its structure is also given more<br />

clearly in the Scripture because it is more useful and more necessary for us to know these than the<br />

structure and reconciliation of the heavens."90 We shall see later how Dávid's job during the later debates<br />

was made harder by the silence of the Scripture. On the other hand, the fact that Sozzini's treatise still<br />

emphasized, though without elaborating in detail, the necessity of the renovation of the angels meant for<br />

Dávid a point of connection between the ideas of Brevis explicatio and Servet's theory.<br />

Following the order of the said contrasting pairs, the work barely mentions the two births, the two<br />

educations and two lives, and says a little more about the two kinds of death. This part is especially interesting<br />

because if earlier the work relied on Servet to the extent of a sentence or an expression, now this<br />

train of thought in its entirety comes from Restitutio. The way it is utilized is again rather arbitrary here.<br />

The problem is discussed by Servet not for its own sake but the first book of De regeneratione superna<br />

addresses the question whether unbaptized children will be damned. A denial of this leads to the<br />

discussion of the consequences of Adam's sin and of the possibilities of man, the difference between the<br />

two deaths being explicated several times in the process. Dávid uses approximately a page length text of<br />

that long chapter, strictly omitting the comments referring to the basic idea of the chapter, doubtlessly<br />

obscuring thereby also the Servetian genesis of the passage. The following quotation, however, not only<br />

justifies that but allows an insight into the methods of the Hungarian Antitrinitarian as well.<br />

+So that we can show the whole +The first and the second death were both the<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!