13.06.2013 Views

63 Colloquial and Li.. - Ganino.com

63 Colloquial and Li.. - Ganino.com

63 Colloquial and Li.. - Ganino.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The sources <strong>and</strong> language of Jordanes 367<br />

(12) caputque eius [i.e. Rufini] et dextera manus<br />

Constantinopolim...circumductum uxoremque eius exulatam<br />

(Rom. 319)<br />

<strong>and</strong> Rufinus’ head <strong>and</strong> right h<strong>and</strong> were brought round Constantinople<br />

<strong>and</strong> his wife was banished,<br />

cf. Marcell. Chron. ii p. 64.395.5 caput eius manusque dextra per totam<br />

Constantinopolim demonstrata; 25<br />

(13) Misahelu et Ardaburem Serdica in exilio misit<br />

he banished Misahelus <strong>and</strong> Ardaburis to Sofia,<br />

(Rom. 360)<br />

cf. Marcell. Chron. ii p. 101.519.2 Misahel et Ardabur Serdicam in exilium<br />

missi;<br />

(14) Archelaus Romae adveniens<br />

as Archelaus came to Rome,<br />

(Rom. 225)<br />

cf.Ruf.Fest.11.4 cum Archelaus . . . Romam venisset.<br />

An analogous case is the usage of the moods in relative clauses. Mommsen<br />

(1882: 183) first noticed that the Romana <strong>and</strong> Getica often display an apparently<br />

unmotivated subjunctive in subordinate clauses, particularly in the<br />

relative ones (‘coniunctivus locum indicativi usurpavit praesertim post<br />

pronomen relativum’). This observation, which was partly confirmed by<br />

Werner (1908: 95), must be revised: a closer examination of all individual<br />

occurrences reveals on the one h<strong>and</strong> that the allegedly incorrect uses of the<br />

subjunctive are limited to the pluperfect (in the other cases one can assume<br />

an attractio) <strong>and</strong>, on the other h<strong>and</strong>, that this mood (unlike the indicative)<br />

is mainly found in clauses having a direct logical connection with the main<br />

sentence, which they usually explain. This mood operates as an additional<br />

signal to highlight the temporal–logical relationship between relative <strong>and</strong><br />

main clause (see Galdi 2008: 321–7). Therefore, we cannot regard these<br />

instances as ‘wrong’ or inappropriate, but rather as conforming to the classical<br />

practice of inserting the subjunctive in those relative clauses with an<br />

additional (causal, concessive, etc.) value (see K–S ii.292–3). For example:<br />

(15) [Nepus] Glycerium, qui sibi tyrannico more regnum inposuisset, ab<br />

imperio expellens (Rom. 338)<br />

Nepus excluded from the <strong>com</strong>m<strong>and</strong> Glycerius, who had usurped power<br />

as a tyrant<br />

25 Jordanes’ use of the neuter singular instead of the plural with the participle (circumductum vs<br />

demonstrata in Marcellinus) is probably to be explained variationis causa.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!