Nicoline van Harskamp - DeLVe | Institute for Duration, Location and ...
Nicoline van Harskamp - DeLVe | Institute for Duration, Location and ...
Nicoline van Harskamp - DeLVe | Institute for Duration, Location and ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1 An attempt to pronounce the abbreviation of the project places it somewhere in-between two words: “wait”<br />
<strong>and</strong> “weight”.<br />
2 The fact that we intentionally appropriate this sentence from the introductory text in the catalogue of our<br />
project The Salon of Revolution (HDLU, Zagreb, October, 2008) additionally confirms this thesis.<br />
3 Giorgio Agamben, „On Potentiality“ in: Giorgio Agamben, Potentialities. Collected Essays in Philosophy, ur. Daniel<br />
Heller-Roazen, Stan<strong>for</strong>d University Press, 2000<br />
4 Ibid.<br />
5 Hannah Arendt: The Human Condition, University of Chicago Press, 1998<br />
6 Revelation is missing only with criminal <strong>and</strong> benefactor; the first must hide from others, <strong>and</strong> the other must<br />
be without self <strong>and</strong> preserve anonymity. Both, according to Arendt, are isolated figures – one against all, <strong>and</strong><br />
the other <strong>for</strong> all people.<br />
7 Ugo Vlaisavljević: Rat kao najveći kulturni događaj - Ka semiotici etnonacionalizma [War as the biggest cultural<br />
event – towards a semiotics of ethno-nationalism], Maunagić d.o.o.- Mauna-fe, Sarajevo, 2007<br />
8 After the massacre of Tiananmen on June 4, 1989, many students emigrated <strong>and</strong> went on their fight <strong>for</strong> freedom<br />
of speech in the western neo-liberal democracies where freedom of speech is constitutionally guaranteed,<br />
where the argument <strong>for</strong> freedom of speech rests precisely on the differentiation of speech from action – according<br />
to it, speaking cannot be acquainted with action, with physical conflict, with aggression <strong>and</strong> hence,<br />
allegedly, cannot affect the (de)stabilisation of society<br />
9 Jean-Luc Nancy, The Inoperative Community, University of Minnesota Press, 1991<br />
10 Jean-Luc Nancy, Being Singular Plural, St<strong>and</strong><strong>for</strong>d University Press, 2000<br />
11 “You share the impossibility of community <strong>and</strong> in this sharing there is your chance of community. It is the<br />
community which cannot send you to death. You might have a voluntary death, that is a possibility, but there<br />
is no expectation except this sharing which is not a word or an abstract concept. You can only share because as<br />
a community it is impossible to do so. This sounds very vague, it sounds like nothing compared to all these big<br />
promises we have about what will happen if we have community, but this vagueness is, I think, worthwhile to<br />
explore”, www.egs.edu/faculty/nancy/nancy-roundtable-discussion2001.html<br />
12 Jean-Luc Nancy, „Eulogy <strong>for</strong> the Mêlé“, in Being Singular Plural, St<strong>and</strong><strong>for</strong>d University Press, 2000<br />
13 Breaking up the homogeneity of identity offered by Nancy’s being singular plural, or Agamben’s whatever<br />
singularity is a transgression of the existing order of things: ”[w]hat the State cannot tolerate in any way, however,<br />
is that the singularities <strong>for</strong>m a community without affirming an identity, that humans co-belong without<br />
any representable condition of belonging (even in the <strong>for</strong>m of a simple presupposition)…For the State, there<strong>for</strong>e,<br />
what is important is never singularity as such, but only its inclusion in some identity, whatever identity<br />
(but the possibility of the whatever itself being taken up without an identity is a threat the State cannot come<br />
to terms with)”, quoted in: Suzana Milevska, „The Phantasm(s) of Belonging: Belonging without Having Something<br />
in Common“, Volksgarten Politics of Belonging. Ed. by Adam Budak, Peter Pakesch, Katia Schurl. Kunsthaus<br />
Graz am L<strong>and</strong>esmuseum Joanneum, 2008<br />
14 Asim Mujkić: “Ideološki problemi konsocijacijske demokratije u Bosni i Hercegovini” [Ideological problems<br />
of consociationist democracy in Bosnia-Herzegovina], Odjek, spring, 2008.<br />
15 Ahmad Beydoun: “Civili, njihove zajednice i država u ratu kao društveni system u Libanonu” [Civilians,<br />
their communities <strong>and</strong> the country in war as the social system in Lebanon], Status, no.12, 2007.<br />
16 Jasmina Husanović: “Politika je umjetnost (ne)mogućega? O ustavnoj re<strong>for</strong>mi u BiH” [Politics is the art of<br />
the (im)possible? On constitutional change in BH], supplement to the journal Dani o ustavnim re<strong>for</strong>mama u<br />
BiH, May 2004.<br />
17 Ibid.<br />
18 Alain Badiou, „Fifteen Theses on Contemporary Art, lecture held on December 4 2003 in the Drawing Center<br />
in New York; the parts cited here are taken from: www.16beavergroup.org/journalisms/archives/000633.php<br />
19 The work Untitled is takes the <strong>for</strong>m of a series of billboards in public space.<br />
Alain Badiou, op.cit.<br />
20 I<strong>van</strong> Grubanov, The Speech in front of the National Parliament, per<strong>for</strong>mance, Belgrade, 2006.<br />
GDJE SE SVE TEK TREBA DOGODITI / WHERE EVERYTHING IS YET TO HAPPEN