12.06.2013 Views

RECOVERY PLAN FOR - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

RECOVERY PLAN FOR - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

RECOVERY PLAN FOR - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The population of L½ochaeta in Area 5 of the Pohakuloa Training<br />

Area <strong>and</strong> collections from the edge of the 1859 Mauna Loa lava flow<br />

had been misidentified as Livochaeta venosa (see Taxonomy<br />

section). The range of L. venosa is not considered to include<br />

these areas.<br />

Population Status of Lipochaeta venosa<br />

Collectors in the first half of this century provided very little<br />

information about the status of this plant. Rock’s collections<br />

are accompanied by no information. Hosaka’s 1938 collection at<br />

Site #4 simply says “rare.”<br />

The observations between 1980 <strong>and</strong> 1984 of the five populations<br />

known at this time report some fairly sizable colonies of<br />

seemingly vigorous flowering <strong>and</strong> fruiting plants. The largest<br />

population was at Site #1. Although the high density <strong>and</strong> matted<br />

habit of the plant made an exact count impossible, it was<br />

estimated that a total of at least 2,000 individuals were growing<br />

in two large areas <strong>and</strong> four smaller patches (Cuddihy ~ al. 1983;<br />

Hawaii Heritage Program EOCODE: PDAST5ZONO.002). The following<br />

counts were reported for the other four sites: Site #2 - 90<br />

plants; Site #4 - 709 plants; Site #5 - 1,350 plants; <strong>and</strong><br />

Site #6 - 24 to 48 plants (Cuddihy ~ al 1983 St. John 1984).<br />

A fire was reported to have burned over Site #1 in 1983 (Carolyn<br />

Corn, pers. comm. 1992). Although no Livochaeta venosa were seen<br />

after the fire during a brief visit to the site by a botanist<br />

(Hawaii Heritage Program EOCODE: PDASTSZONO.002), large numbers of<br />

the plant were seen in September 1991, by a team of forestry<br />

personnel <strong>and</strong> botanists from the National Tropical Botanical<br />

Garden (NTBG) (Steve Bergfeld, Division of Forestry <strong>and</strong> <strong>Wildlife</strong>,<br />

pers. comm. 1992).<br />

The presence of “several hundred” plants at Site #5 was<br />

reconfirmed in 1990 (5. Bergfeld, pers. comm. 1992; Hawaii<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!