12.06.2013 Views

Susana Isabel Ferreira da Silva de Sá ESTROGÉNIOS E ...

Susana Isabel Ferreira da Silva de Sá ESTROGÉNIOS E ...

Susana Isabel Ferreira da Silva de Sá ESTROGÉNIOS E ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 1. Serum estradiol and progesterone levels, uterine weight and lordosis intensity in rats belonging to the different groups analyzed in<br />

Experiments 1 and 2<br />

weight was similar to that of estradiol-treated rats and,<br />

accordingly, was significantly higher than in oil-treated<br />

rats. Rats treated with DPN had uterine weights similar to<br />

those of rats treated with oil or progesterone alone. Progesterone<br />

administration had no statistically significant effect<br />

(P0.05) on uterine weight compared to oil-treated<br />

rats.<br />

Numerical <strong>de</strong>nsity of synapses<br />

Estradiol (pg/ml) Progesterone (ng/ml) Uterine weight (g) Lordosis intensity<br />

O group 33.17 (3.14) 4.02 (0.22) 0.25 (0.03) 0<br />

P group 33.70 (0.71) 14.52 (0.84) 0.24 (0.02) 0<br />

EBP group 59.55 (4.49)* 13.48 (0.59) 0.91 (0.09) ## 2.5 (0.22)<br />

EBRU group 64.76 (9.14)** 4.69 (0.14) 1.10 (0.16) ## 0<br />

EB group 63.47 (5.87)* 5.82 (0.66) 0.89 (0.07) ## 0<br />

2 EB group 110.61 (7.09) xxx 5.56 (0.64) 0.79 (0.05) # 0<br />

PPT group 34.17 (4.09) 3.63 (0.54) 0.81 (0.08) ## 0<br />

DPN group 33.23 (3.90) 4.40 (0.60) 0.25 (0.21) 0<br />

Values are expressed as means (SEM). * P0.05; ** P0.005, compared with groups that were not injected with estradiol; xxx P0.0005 compared<br />

with all other groups; P0.0005 compared with groups that were not injected with progesterone; # P0.005, ## P0.0005 compared with O-, P- and<br />

DPN-treated groups.<br />

In Experiment 1 (Fig. 2), in which O, P, EB, EBP and<br />

EBRU groups were studied, we found no significant influence<br />

of treatment in the N V of spine (F 4,252.85;<br />

P0.05) and <strong>de</strong>ndritic (F 4,251.75; P0.17) synapses. In<br />

contrast, in Experiment 2 (Fig. 3), in which O, EB, 2 EB,<br />

PPT and DPN groups were analyzed, ANOVA revealed a<br />

significant effect of treatment on the N V of both types of<br />

synapses (F 4,2519.90; P0.0001 for spine and F 4,25<br />

7.63; P0.0004 for <strong>de</strong>ndritic synapses). With respect to<br />

spine synapses, the <strong>de</strong>nsity was significantly higher in 2<br />

EB- and PPT-treated rats than in the remaining groups. In<br />

<strong>de</strong>ndritic synapses, this difference was only apparent for<br />

the PTT-treated group and no significant difference was<br />

found between 2 EB-treated rats and the remaining<br />

groups.<br />

Fig. 2. Graphic representation of the N V of spine (white columns) and<br />

<strong>de</strong>ndritic (black columns) synapses in the VMNvl of rats studied in<br />

Experiment 1. The number of animals per group was six. On average,<br />

200 synapses were counted per animal. Columns represent means<br />

and vertical bars 1 SD.<br />

S. I. <strong>Sá</strong> et al. / Neuroscience 162 (2009) 307–316 311<br />

Neuronal numerical <strong>de</strong>nsity<br />

ANOVA revealed a significant influence of treatment in the<br />

N V of VMNvl neurons in Experiment 1 (F 4,255.70; P<br />

0.005) as well as in Experiment 2 (F 4,257.46; P0.0005).<br />

In Experiment 1 (Fig. 4), rats injected with estradiol (EB,<br />

EBP and EBRU groups) had significantly fewer neurons<br />

per unit volume of the VMNvl than rats injected with oil<br />

or progesterone (O and P groups). In Experiment 2 (Fig.<br />

4), rats treated with estradiol (EB and 2 EB groups) and<br />

rats receiving ER agonists (PPT and DPN groups) had<br />

significantly lower neuronal numerical <strong>de</strong>nsities than oiltreated<br />

rats. No significant differences were <strong>de</strong>tected<br />

among EB, 2 EB, PPT and DPN groups.<br />

Total number of synapses per neuron<br />

The variations in synapse numbers induced by the administration<br />

of hormones, and receptor agonists and antagonists<br />

are shown in Figs. 5 and 6 and summarized in the<br />

diagram shown in Fig. 7. Treatments used in Experiment 1<br />

significantly influenced the total number of spine (F 4,259.57;<br />

P0.0001) and <strong>de</strong>ndritic (F 4,257.73; P0.001) synapses<br />

established by each VMNvl neuron (Fig. 5). The number of<br />

Fig. 3. Graphic representation of the N V of spine (white columns) and<br />

<strong>de</strong>ndritic (black columns) synapses in the VMNvl of rats studied in<br />

Experiment 2. The number of animals per group was six. On average,<br />

200 synapses were counted per animal. Columns represent means<br />

and vertical bars 1 SD. Tukey’s post hoc tests: * P0.05, ** P0.0005<br />

compared with O-treated group; P0.005, P0.0005 compared<br />

with EB-treated group; # P0.005 compared with DPN-treated group.<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!