Susana Isabel Ferreira da Silva de Sá ESTROGÉNIOS E ...
Susana Isabel Ferreira da Silva de Sá ESTROGÉNIOS E ...
Susana Isabel Ferreira da Silva de Sá ESTROGÉNIOS E ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SYNAPTIC PLASTICITY IN THE VM NUCLEUS<br />
and axospinous synapses rather than a shift in synapse<br />
location between <strong>de</strong>ndritic shafts and <strong>de</strong>ndritic spines. In<br />
addition, and in line with observations carried out in other<br />
regions of the brain, such as the hippocampal formation<br />
(Woolley and McEwen, 1992) and the cerebral cortex (Trachtenberg<br />
et al., 2002), our results show that in the VM-<br />
Nvl of the adult rat changes in <strong>de</strong>ndritic spine <strong>de</strong>nsity<br />
correlate positively with changes in the number of axospinous<br />
synapses.<br />
Data obtained in this study also show that estrogen does<br />
not interfere with the size of individual synaptic contacts.<br />
In fact, the surface area of the individual postsynaptic<br />
<strong>de</strong>nsities of axo<strong>de</strong>ndritic and axospinous synapses did not<br />
differ between proestrus and diestrus rats, a finding that<br />
is in agreement with the lack of variations in the length of<br />
the synaptic contacts in the VMNvl after the administration<br />
of estrogen to ovariectomized rats (Carrer and Aoki,<br />
1982). However, because the number of axo<strong>de</strong>ndritic and<br />
axospinous synapses is higher in proestrus than in<br />
diestrus rats, the total area of <strong>de</strong>ndritic membrane occupied<br />
by synaptic contacts is significantly increased when<br />
estrogen levels are high. The finding that the percentage<br />
of plasmalemma of <strong>de</strong>ndritic spines occupied by postsynaptic<br />
<strong>de</strong>nsities does not vary across the estrus cycle indicates<br />
that spines that are newly formed in each proestrus,<br />
as hormone levels rise, do not differ with respect to their<br />
size from the spines that persist during diestrus, when<br />
hormone levels <strong>de</strong>cline. There is increasing evi<strong>de</strong>nce that<br />
spines with large heads are stable and contribute to strong<br />
synaptic connections, contrary to spines with small heads<br />
that are motile and unstable, and contribute to weak or<br />
silent synaptic connections (Kasai et al., 2003). Therefore,<br />
our <strong>da</strong>ta indicate that the synapses that are ad<strong>de</strong>d to, and<br />
removed from, VMNvl neurons during each estrus cycle do<br />
not differ with respect to their stability and function from<br />
the pool of synapses received by these neurons at low<br />
estrogen levels.<br />
We have also found that sex steroids influence not only<br />
the <strong>de</strong>ndritic synapses, but also the smaller population of<br />
synapses established upon the cell bodies of VMNvl neurons.<br />
In effect, although somatic synapses did not change<br />
in size over the estrus cycle, they were more numerous at<br />
high estrogen levels, that is, during proestrus. This observation<br />
lends support to the view that the plastic changes<br />
displayed by hypothalamic synapses over the estrus cycle<br />
are region-specific. Actually, in the nearby located arcuate<br />
nucleus, the number of axosomatic synapses does not increase<br />
in response to estrogen, as happens in the VMNvl,<br />
but <strong>de</strong>clines when estrogen levels are low, i.e., during<br />
estrus (Olmos et al., 1989), as opposed to what occurs in<br />
the anteroventral periventricular nucleus, where low estrogen<br />
levels lead to increases in the number of axosomatic<br />
synapses (Langub et al., 1994). It is known that<br />
somatic synapses are mostly symmetrical and that most of<br />
these synapses are inhibitory (Uchizono, 1965; Colonnier,<br />
1968), contrary to asymmetrical synapses, which are presumed<br />
excitatory (Westrum and Blackstad, 1962; Harris<br />
and Stevens, 1989). Our <strong>da</strong>ta indicate that, in each<br />
proestrus, individual VMNvl neurons receive more than<br />
3,000 excitatory synapses and more than 40 inhibitory<br />
synapses than in the preceding or following diestrus,<br />
which suggests that estrogen enhances the activity of<br />
VMNvl neurons by promoting a proportionally greater<br />
increase in the excitatory drive than in the inhibitory<br />
inputs they receive.<br />
36<br />
Sex differences in the synaptic organization<br />
of the VMN<br />
The VMN has been classically regar<strong>de</strong>d as a sexually<br />
dimorphic nucleus, a concept corroborated by <strong>da</strong>ta obtained<br />
in this study. Actually, we have found that females<br />
in proestrus have more synapses than males, a sex-related<br />
difference no longer apparent when females are in<br />
diestrus. The existence of more <strong>de</strong>ndritic synapses in<br />
proestrus rats than in males was accounted for by sex<br />
differences in the number of axospinous (54%) and axo<strong>de</strong>ndritic<br />
(24%) synapses that favor females. Interestingly,<br />
opposite sex differences were noticed in the number<br />
of somatic synapses, which were 46% more numerous in<br />
males than in diestrus rats. These <strong>da</strong>ta show that, by<br />
comparison with males, VMNvl neurons from proestrus<br />
females receive more excitatory inputs and the same<br />
amount of inhibitory inputs, whereas neurons from<br />
diestrus females receive a similar amount of excitatory,<br />
but a smaller amount of inhibitory inputs. This sexual<br />
dimorphic pattern appears to be specific to the VMNvl, as<br />
it does not mirror the sex differences in the synaptic<br />
organization of other steroid-sensitive regions of the<br />
brain. For example, in the arcuate nucleus, which, similar<br />
to the VMNvl, displays sex differences in its anatomy<br />
(Leal et al., 1998) and exhibits phasic synaptic changes<br />
across the estrus cycle (Olmos et al., 1989), the <strong>de</strong>nsity of<br />
axo<strong>de</strong>ndritic synapses does not differ between the sexes<br />
contrary to the <strong>de</strong>nsity of axospinous and axosomatic synapses,<br />
which is greater in females (Matsumoto and Arai,<br />
1980; Pérez et al., 1990).<br />
Interestingly, the sole parameter that consistently<br />
showed sex-related differences was the surface area of the<br />
postsynaptic <strong>de</strong>nsities of individual axospinous and axosomatic<br />
synapses, which was 30% smaller in females<br />
than in males. It seems clear that the size of postsynaptic<br />
<strong>de</strong>nsities is <strong>de</strong>termined by the organizational effects of sex<br />
steroids during the perinatal period and is not sensitive to<br />
the activational effects of these hormones during adulthood,<br />
as no correlation with hormonal levels was noticed<br />
in females. Because the postsynaptic <strong>de</strong>nsities of axospinous<br />
synapses are larger in males than in females and the<br />
percentage of plasmalemma occupied by postsynaptic <strong>de</strong>nsities<br />
does not differ between the sexes, there are reasons<br />
to assume that the volume of <strong>de</strong>ndritic spines is greater in<br />
males than in females. This was not an unexpected finding,<br />
because earlier studies have shown that the size of the<br />
postsynaptic <strong>de</strong>nsities positively correlates with the size of<br />
spines (Harris and Stevens, 1989; Sorra and Harris, 2000;<br />
Kasai et al., 2003). Given that spines with larger heads<br />
and postsynaptic <strong>de</strong>nsities have greater sensitivity to glutamate<br />
(Harris and Stevens, 1989; Schikorski and<br />
Stevens, 1997; Kasai et al., 2003), there are reasons to<br />
assume that, in addition to differences in the number of<br />
synapses, males and females also differ with respect to the<br />
efficacy of synaptic transmission in the VMNvl.<br />
Previous studies have shown that in the VMNvl there<br />
are sex-related differences that favor males in the <strong>de</strong>nsity<br />
of axo<strong>de</strong>ndritic and axosomatic synapses (Matsumoto and<br />
Arai, 1986b; Miller and Aoki, 1991). Discrepancies between<br />
these and our own <strong>da</strong>ta are difficult to un<strong>de</strong>rstand<br />
because in all cases, including the present study, analyses<br />
were centered on the VMNvl. However, in those studies<br />
the phase of the estrus cycle was not i<strong>de</strong>ntified and, as<br />
already mentioned, the estimates report synapse <strong>de</strong>nsities<br />
77