11.06.2013 Views

Incidence, Distribution and Characteristics of Major Tomato Leaf ...

Incidence, Distribution and Characteristics of Major Tomato Leaf ...

Incidence, Distribution and Characteristics of Major Tomato Leaf ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Incidence</strong>, distribution <strong>and</strong> characteristics <strong>of</strong> major tomato leaf curl <strong>and</strong> mosaic virus diseases<br />

blotted onto nylon membranes to test for TYLCV DNA. For each sample squashed, a<br />

portion was dried over anhydrous calcium chloride at 4ºC, in petridishes (Green, 1991)<br />

<strong>and</strong> stored in the refrigerator.<br />

Consequently, every yellow leaf curl symptom-bearing sample that did not test positive<br />

through DAS-ELISA or had very clear TYLCV associated symptoms <strong>and</strong> was straight<br />

away suspected to be caused by tomato yellow leaf curl viruses (sensu lato), was<br />

subjected to molecular tests (Table 3.2). Of 800 samples tested in serology, 102 tomato<br />

leaf samples were negative to any <strong>of</strong> the eight viruses. <strong>Tomato</strong> samples bearing leaf curl,<br />

mosaic <strong>and</strong> mottling, but not testing positive through DAS-ELISA included: sample MP4<br />

with mosaic symptoms, MP11 with white mosaic symptoms, IG9 with green mosaic<br />

symptoms, IG8 with green mosaic symptoms, MB6 with bronzing, mild mosaic <strong>and</strong> curl<br />

symptoms, <strong>and</strong> sample MPz with severe mosaic symptoms. Some samples were tested<br />

more than once depending on their previous reactions.<br />

3.2.2.2.1 Virus Characterization Using DNA Hybridisation<br />

DNA hybridisation was used to test for the presence <strong>of</strong> TYLCV. It involved preparation<br />

<strong>of</strong> P³²-labeled probes <strong>and</strong> hybridisation <strong>of</strong> squash-blotted or dot-blotted nylon membranes<br />

(Czosnek et al., 1988).<br />

3.2.2.2.1.1 Sample Preparation for DNA Hybridisation<br />

To prepare dot-blotted nylon membranes, preserved dry as well as fresh leaf curl <strong>and</strong><br />

yellow mottling symptom bearing tomato leaf samples (Figure 3.3) were squashed in TE<br />

buffer (Tris-EDTA), with Kontes blue pestles in eppendorf tubes <strong>and</strong> placed on ice<br />

(Nahkla et al., 1993). Squashed samples were centrifuged for 5 min, at 5,000 rpm. Pellets<br />

formed were discarded <strong>and</strong> supernatant used for dot-blotting (Nahkla et al., 1993).<br />

QIAGEN Nylon Plus membranes from QIAGEN Inc., 28159 Av. Stanford Santa Clarita<br />

CA 91355, were used. For each sample, a dot-blot spot <strong>of</strong> 5 µl <strong>of</strong> supernatant was blotted<br />

twice on separate spots on the membrane to minimize errors. Blotted membranes were<br />

61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!