Incidence, Distribution and Characteristics of Major Tomato Leaf ...
Incidence, Distribution and Characteristics of Major Tomato Leaf ... Incidence, Distribution and Characteristics of Major Tomato Leaf ...
A Incidence, distribution and characteristics of major tomato leaf curl and mosaic virus diseases B C D E F Figure 3. 6: Some miscellaneous symptoms observed on tomato plants in the surveyed area. Some of these (A, E, F) seem to be due to the plant’s reaction to pesticides 58
Incidence, distribution and characteristics of major tomato leaf curl and mosaic virus diseases 3.2.2 Identification of Viral Diseases 3.2.2.1 Serological Identification of Tomato Viruses Double Antigen Sandwich-Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (DAS-ELISA), as described by Clark and Adams (1977), was selected because it is efficient and cheap, and after all Nono-Womdim et al. (1996) used it successfully to identify tomato viruses in Tanzania. Therefore, we used DAS-ELISA to confirm that symptoms seen in the field were actually due to virus causal organisms. The technique was also used to identify those viruses infecting collected tomato leafy symptom-bearing samples. Mottling and mosaic symptom-bearing tomato leaf samples, which were collected, dried and preserved over calcium chloride, were then packed in self-sealing polythene bags, with five grams per bag. Dry samples were then crushed to powder. A total of 10 ml of extraction buffer (0.03 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4) was added to each bag. The mixture was ground with a pestle to extract sap, which was used for ELISA tests (Bar-Joseph and Hull, 1974). Using DAS-ELISA, mottling and mosaic symptoms-bearing tomato leaf sample extracts were tested for eight viruses commonly encountered in Africa (Brunt et al., 1990; Nono- Womdim et al., 1996) and for which antisera could be obtained commercially. These were ToMV, TSWV, PVMV, PVY, PVX, CMV, AMV and ChiVMV. Polyclonal antisera and conjugates for these viruses were obtained from SANOFI, France. Based on standard dilution recommendations, polystyrene microtiter plates were coated with immunoglobulins (IgG) of the eight viruses at the following manufacturer’s given concentrations; 30µl/15ml (ToMV), 300µl/15ml (PVMV), 30µl/15ml (TSWV), 60µl/15ml (PVY), 150µl/15ml (PVX), 150µl/15ml (CMV), 30µl/15ml (AMV) and 150µl/15ml (ChiVMV) in sodium carbonate coating buffer (0.2M, pH 9.6), and incubated for 3 hours at 37 ºC to achieve maximum detection of target viruses. One hundred microlitres of coating buffer and immunoglobulins solution was put in each well. Plates were then washed three times with 0.01 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS-Tween 20) buffer, and dried over tissue paper (Nono-Womdim and Atibalentja, 1993). Plate wells were filled with 0.10 ml of tomato sample extract ground in PBS pH 7.4 (1:2, W/V) and 59
- Page 32 and 33: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 34 and 35: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 36 and 37: Table 2.1: The orthography of some
- Page 38 and 39: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 40 and 41: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 42 and 43: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 44 and 45: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 46 and 47: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 48 and 49: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 50 and 51: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 52 and 53: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 54 and 55: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 56 and 57: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 58 and 59: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 60 and 61: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 62 and 63: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 64 and 65: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 66 and 67: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 68 and 69: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 70 and 71: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 72 and 73: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 74 and 75: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 76 and 77: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 78 and 79: A B Incidence, distribution and cha
- Page 80 and 81: A B Incidence, distribution and cha
- Page 84 and 85: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 86 and 87: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 88 and 89: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 90 and 91: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 92 and 93: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 94 and 95: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 96 and 97: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 98 and 99: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 100 and 101: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 102 and 103: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 104 and 105: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 106 and 107: Isolate IG1 Incidence, distribution
- Page 108 and 109: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 110 and 111: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 112 and 113: 1600 500 700 200 Incidence, distrib
- Page 114 and 115: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 116 and 117: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 118 and 119: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 120 and 121: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 122 and 123: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 124 and 125: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 126 and 127: 1200 1200 (A) IG1 (ToLCV-UG) PAL1v
- Page 128 and 129: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 130 and 131: Incidence, distribution and charact
<strong>Incidence</strong>, distribution <strong>and</strong> characteristics <strong>of</strong> major tomato leaf curl <strong>and</strong> mosaic virus diseases<br />
3.2.2 Identification <strong>of</strong> Viral Diseases<br />
3.2.2.1 Serological Identification <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tomato</strong> Viruses<br />
Double Antigen S<strong>and</strong>wich-Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (DAS-ELISA), as<br />
described by Clark <strong>and</strong> Adams (1977), was selected because it is efficient <strong>and</strong> cheap, <strong>and</strong><br />
after all Nono-Womdim et al. (1996) used it successfully to identify tomato viruses in<br />
Tanzania. Therefore, we used DAS-ELISA to confirm that symptoms seen in the field<br />
were actually due to virus causal organisms. The technique was also used to identify<br />
those viruses infecting collected tomato leafy symptom-bearing samples. Mottling <strong>and</strong><br />
mosaic symptom-bearing tomato leaf samples, which were collected, dried <strong>and</strong> preserved<br />
over calcium chloride, were then packed in self-sealing polythene bags, with five grams<br />
per bag. Dry samples were then crushed to powder. A total <strong>of</strong> 10 ml <strong>of</strong> extraction buffer<br />
(0.03 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4) was added to each bag. The mixture was ground with<br />
a pestle to extract sap, which was used for ELISA tests (Bar-Joseph <strong>and</strong> Hull, 1974).<br />
Using DAS-ELISA, mottling <strong>and</strong> mosaic symptoms-bearing tomato leaf sample extracts<br />
were tested for eight viruses commonly encountered in Africa (Brunt et al., 1990; Nono-<br />
Womdim et al., 1996) <strong>and</strong> for which antisera could be obtained commercially. These<br />
were ToMV, TSWV, PVMV, PVY, PVX, CMV, AMV <strong>and</strong> ChiVMV. Polyclonal<br />
antisera <strong>and</strong> conjugates for these viruses were obtained from SANOFI, France.<br />
Based on st<strong>and</strong>ard dilution recommendations, polystyrene microtiter plates were coated<br />
with immunoglobulins (IgG) <strong>of</strong> the eight viruses at the following manufacturer’s given<br />
concentrations; 30µl/15ml (ToMV), 300µl/15ml (PVMV), 30µl/15ml (TSWV),<br />
60µl/15ml (PVY), 150µl/15ml (PVX), 150µl/15ml (CMV), 30µl/15ml (AMV) <strong>and</strong><br />
150µl/15ml (ChiVMV) in sodium carbonate coating buffer (0.2M, pH 9.6), <strong>and</strong> incubated<br />
for 3 hours at 37 ºC to achieve maximum detection <strong>of</strong> target viruses. One hundred<br />
microlitres <strong>of</strong> coating buffer <strong>and</strong> immunoglobulins solution was put in each well. Plates<br />
were then washed three times with 0.01 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS-Tween 20)<br />
buffer, <strong>and</strong> dried over tissue paper (Nono-Womdim <strong>and</strong> Atibalentja, 1993). Plate wells<br />
were filled with 0.10 ml <strong>of</strong> tomato sample extract ground in PBS pH 7.4 (1:2, W/V) <strong>and</strong><br />
59