Incidence, Distribution and Characteristics of Major Tomato Leaf ...

Incidence, Distribution and Characteristics of Major Tomato Leaf ... Incidence, Distribution and Characteristics of Major Tomato Leaf ...

tropicallab.ugent.be
from tropicallab.ugent.be More from this publisher
11.06.2013 Views

Incidence, distribution and characteristics of major tomato leaf curl and mosaic virus diseases (inoculum access period, or the period during which a vector pierces cells and infects plant with virus inoculum), takes 32 min to 24 hours. In contrast, Ber et al. (1990), reported an AAP of 48 hours, and that infected plants take a maximum of 15 - 29 days to show symptoms. However, it was found that there is a need for a pre-and postacquisition fasting period of at least 1 - 2 hours to enhance transmission efficiency. Cohen and Nitzany (1966) reported a latent period of 21 hours before the vector transmits the virus. Caciagli et al. (1995) found that the latent period is 17 - 20 days. They also established that the virus persists in the vector for 20 days. These scientists seem to agree that whitefly transmission is persistent, i.e. able to infect plants with virus inoculum all the time, whereas inoculum is not carried over to their offsprings. Furthermore, Caciagli et al. (1995) found that virus acquisition is more efficient than inoculation, and females are more efficient in transmission than males, while nymphs are as efficient as adults in acquiring the virus, but of little epidemiological importance because of being immobile. Rataul and Brar (1989) determined transmission efficiency by use of χ² analysis of data from number of plants infected and expected number of plants to be infected. Other methods of analysing transmission are through calculating the probability of disease transmission (Rataul and Brar, 1989) by: p = 1-Q ¹/k (5), whereby p is probability of disease transmission by single vector, Q is observed fraction of non-infected plants; and k is number of insects used per plant. Furthermore, the effect of IAP on transmission by a single vector is determined by expressing the growth rate of increase in infection, which is expressed as (dp/dt), and is said to increase linearly with the proportion of uninfective insects. 38

Incidence, distribution and characteristics of major tomato leaf curl and mosaic virus diseases 2.1.3.1.1.1 Whitefly Vector Population in the Agro-ecosystem In many parts of Africa, seasonal contrasts in rainfall influence pest populations (Elkinton, 1993). Rainfall provides adequate moisture for growth of plant hosts, but also affects the success or failure of oviposition and egg development of the vector (Duffus, 1992). Nono Womdim et al. (1996) reported that in Tanzania, whitefly population size changed with season, the major variables being rainfall and temperature. Similar results were reported for Egypt (Moustafa, 1991). Riley and Wolfenbarger (1993) recorded a similar pattern in Bemisia tabaci populations, which change from year to year and season to season. Natural enemies and pesticides were also found to affect whitefly populations. Riley et al. (1995) reported that natural enemies and agricultural pesticides, in addition to climatic factors influence whitefly population dynamics. Furthermore, Baumgartner and Yano (1990) stressed the role of natural enemies. It was established that the use of pesticides reduces populations of natural enemies, and subsequently enhances whitefly population growth, while the possibility for whitefly resistance to pesticides was not ruled out (Duffus, 1995). Another factor influencing the development of whitefly vector populations is intensified agricultural practices. In the Americas, international transport of plant materials introduced new B. tabaci biotypes into the ecosystem (Duffus, 1992; Polston and Anderson, 1997). On the other hand, plant hosts already in the ecosystem do also affect whitefly population dynamics. Legg (1996), while working with whiteflies on cassava, found that B. tabaci population growth on cassava, sweet potato and cotton host plants differed from each other. He observed that there were variable establishment success levels on individual crops. B. tabaci survived better on cotton than on any other host (Legg, 1996; Byrne et al., 1990; Von Arx et al., 1983). Lettuce (Lactuca sativa) was also reported to be a very good host for B. tabaci (Byrne et al., 1990). It was further observed that there were variable establishment success levels on individual crops. It was further observed that as whiteflies migrate from one host to another, their population increases on the new host as 39

<strong>Incidence</strong>, distribution <strong>and</strong> characteristics <strong>of</strong> major tomato leaf curl <strong>and</strong> mosaic virus diseases<br />

2.1.3.1.1.1 Whitefly Vector Population in the Agro-ecosystem<br />

In many parts <strong>of</strong> Africa, seasonal contrasts in rainfall influence pest populations<br />

(Elkinton, 1993). Rainfall provides adequate moisture for growth <strong>of</strong> plant hosts, but also<br />

affects the success or failure <strong>of</strong> oviposition <strong>and</strong> egg development <strong>of</strong> the vector (Duffus,<br />

1992).<br />

Nono Womdim et al. (1996) reported that in Tanzania, whitefly population size changed<br />

with season, the major variables being rainfall <strong>and</strong> temperature. Similar results were<br />

reported for Egypt (Moustafa, 1991). Riley <strong>and</strong> Wolfenbarger (1993) recorded a similar<br />

pattern in Bemisia tabaci populations, which change from year to year <strong>and</strong> season to<br />

season. Natural enemies <strong>and</strong> pesticides were also found to affect whitefly populations.<br />

Riley et al. (1995) reported that natural enemies <strong>and</strong> agricultural pesticides, in addition to<br />

climatic factors influence whitefly population dynamics. Furthermore, Baumgartner <strong>and</strong><br />

Yano (1990) stressed the role <strong>of</strong> natural enemies. It was established that the use <strong>of</strong><br />

pesticides reduces populations <strong>of</strong> natural enemies, <strong>and</strong> subsequently enhances whitefly<br />

population growth, while the possibility for whitefly resistance to pesticides was not<br />

ruled out (Duffus, 1995). Another factor influencing the development <strong>of</strong> whitefly vector<br />

populations is intensified agricultural practices.<br />

In the Americas, international transport <strong>of</strong> plant materials introduced new B. tabaci<br />

biotypes into the ecosystem (Duffus, 1992; Polston <strong>and</strong> Anderson, 1997). On the other<br />

h<strong>and</strong>, plant hosts already in the ecosystem do also affect whitefly population dynamics.<br />

Legg (1996), while working with whiteflies on cassava, found that B. tabaci population<br />

growth on cassava, sweet potato <strong>and</strong> cotton host plants differed from each other. He<br />

observed that there were variable establishment success levels on individual crops. B.<br />

tabaci survived better on cotton than on any other host (Legg, 1996; Byrne et al., 1990;<br />

Von Arx et al., 1983). Lettuce (Lactuca sativa) was also reported to be a very good host<br />

for B. tabaci (Byrne et al., 1990). It was further observed that there were variable<br />

establishment success levels on individual crops. It was further observed that as<br />

whiteflies migrate from one host to another, their population increases on the new host as<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!