11.06.2013 Views

Incidence, Distribution and Characteristics of Major Tomato Leaf ...

Incidence, Distribution and Characteristics of Major Tomato Leaf ...

Incidence, Distribution and Characteristics of Major Tomato Leaf ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Incidence</strong>, distribution <strong>and</strong> characteristics <strong>of</strong> major tomato leaf curl <strong>and</strong> mosaic virus diseases<br />

(inoculum access period, or the period during which a vector pierces cells <strong>and</strong> infects<br />

plant with virus inoculum), takes 32 min to 24 hours. In contrast, Ber et al. (1990),<br />

reported an AAP <strong>of</strong> 48 hours, <strong>and</strong> that infected plants take a maximum <strong>of</strong> 15 - 29 days to<br />

show symptoms. However, it was found that there is a need for a pre-<strong>and</strong> postacquisition<br />

fasting period <strong>of</strong> at least 1 - 2 hours to enhance transmission efficiency.<br />

Cohen <strong>and</strong> Nitzany (1966) reported a latent period <strong>of</strong> 21 hours before the vector transmits<br />

the virus. Caciagli et al. (1995) found that the latent period is 17 - 20 days. They also<br />

established that the virus persists in the vector for 20 days. These scientists seem to agree<br />

that whitefly transmission is persistent, i.e. able to infect plants with virus inoculum all<br />

the time, whereas inoculum is not carried over to their <strong>of</strong>fsprings.<br />

Furthermore, Caciagli et al. (1995) found that virus acquisition is more efficient than<br />

inoculation, <strong>and</strong> females are more efficient in transmission than males, while nymphs are<br />

as efficient as adults in acquiring the virus, but <strong>of</strong> little epidemiological importance<br />

because <strong>of</strong> being immobile.<br />

Rataul <strong>and</strong> Brar (1989) determined transmission efficiency by use <strong>of</strong> χ² analysis <strong>of</strong> data<br />

from number <strong>of</strong> plants infected <strong>and</strong> expected number <strong>of</strong> plants to be infected. Other<br />

methods <strong>of</strong> analysing transmission are through calculating the probability <strong>of</strong> disease<br />

transmission (Rataul <strong>and</strong> Brar, 1989) by:<br />

p = 1-Q ¹/k (5),<br />

whereby p is probability <strong>of</strong> disease transmission by single vector, Q is observed fraction<br />

<strong>of</strong> non-infected plants; <strong>and</strong> k is number <strong>of</strong> insects used per plant.<br />

Furthermore, the effect <strong>of</strong> IAP on transmission by a single vector is determined by<br />

expressing the growth rate <strong>of</strong> increase in infection, which is expressed as (dp/dt), <strong>and</strong> is<br />

said to increase linearly with the proportion <strong>of</strong> uninfective insects.<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!