Incidence, Distribution and Characteristics of Major Tomato Leaf ...
Incidence, Distribution and Characteristics of Major Tomato Leaf ... Incidence, Distribution and Characteristics of Major Tomato Leaf ...
Incidence, distribution and characteristics of major tomato leaf curl and mosaic virus diseases 2006 personal communication). In addition to the above techniques, immunoelectron microscopy can be used to identify individual viruses occurring in a single plant sap extract at the same time, and also to study virus particle size and shape (Duncan and Torrance, 1992). Furthermore, there is the Double-Antigen-Sandwich Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (DAS-ELISA) used for immediate serological identification of viruses in a sample, based on viral protein differences (Clark and Adams, 1977). DAS- ELISA is widely used. The reagents and chemicals required are readily available, and it gives adequate identification of viruses. Nono-Womdim and Atibalentja (1993) used DAS-ELISA to identify PVMV in sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum) in Cameroon. Like all other ELISAs, it is fairly cheap, especially if antisera can be produced locally and do not have to be bought from commercial companies. Triple-Antibody-Sandwich (TAS-ELISA) is another form of ELISA. It uses monoclonal antibodies to detect viruses such as tomato geminiviruses (Credi et al., 1989; Roberts et al., 1984; Thomas et al., 1986). TAS is efficient and easy to conduct in conditions of limited time and space. Macintosh et al. (1992) used TAS to study tomato geminiviruses in Europe. It is more specific than DAS, because of the monoclonal antibodies used. Like DAS, it is fairly cheap (Matthews, 1991), though not as accurate as molecular techniques. 2.1.2.3 Molecular Tests Recently, molecular techniques have been developed to identify viruses. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) is one of these techniques (Duncan and Torrance, 1992). It is based on differences between viral nucleic acid, and is very efficient, as well as accurate depending on the type of primers used (specific or general) (Lewin, 1997). However, it is an expensive technique using high cost equipment and reagents (Maniatis et al., 1982). Similarly, the nucleic acid hybridisation test is another convenient molecular technique for identifying viruses that cannot be identified by using serology (Czosnek et al., 1988). It is efficient, but uses expensive reagents and chemicals. It requires special expensive laboratory facilities, especially if it uses radioactive probes (P³²) and not non-radioactive 30
Incidence, distribution and characteristics of major tomato leaf curl and mosaic virus diseases (biotin) ones. Furthermore, DNA hybridisation is very useful in that it can be used to test samples sent from normally poorly equipped laboratories in developing countries to advanced laboratories. One way of quickly differentiating geminiviruses is by sequence pairwise comparison and phylogenies (Padidam et al., 1995; Brown, 1997; Fauquet et al., 2003). However, there are different opinions. Some scientists feel that sequence comparisons could be based on the intergenic region and coat protein gene (Brown, 1997) in the absence of a complete DNA sequence, while others feel that full sequence comparisons (Fauquet et al., 2003) are necessary. In the absence of adequate resources, the former approach to geminivirus identification would be most appropriate for developing countries, whereas complete sequence comparisons would be encouraged, where possible. Based on results obtained by using the above techniques, and under the coordination of the International Committee for the Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV), tomato viruses have been characterized and grouped in orders, families, genera and species (Padidam et al., 1997; Fauquet and Mayo, 1999; Pringle, 1999; Mayo and Brunt, 2005). 2.1.3 Virus Epidemiology and Vector Relationships 2.1.3.1 Virus Transmission Viruses can be transmitted by mechanical means, and by pollen, seeds, fungi, nematodes, mites, as well as insects (Green and Kim, 1991; Green, 1991; Jones et al., 1991), although there is considerable specificity and any one virus is often transmitted by only some of these routes. Mechanical transmission is mostly restricted to non-persistent and semi-persistent aphid-transmitted, leafhopper-transmitted and some whitefly-transmitted viruses (Brunt et al., 1990; Green 1991; Jones et al., 1991). Known insect vectors of tomato viruses are beetles, aphids, leafhoppers, thrips and whiteflies (Lyons et al, 1985; Duffus, 1987; Black et al., 1991; Green and Kim, 1991 and Green, 1991; Jones et al., 31
- Page 4 and 5: Charles SSEKYEWA Incidence, Distrib
- Page 6 and 7: CONTENTS 1 CHAPTER 1...............
- Page 8 and 9: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The following perso
- Page 10 and 11: vii 7 mosaic virus (CMV), Alfalfa m
- Page 12 and 13: ix 9 Consequently, our findings con
- Page 14 and 15: SAMENVATTING Tomaat is een economis
- Page 16 and 17: xiii 13 Beide genhomologie percenta
- Page 18 and 19: xv 15 dit onderzoek geven ook aan d
- Page 20 and 21: LIST OF TABLES xvii 17 Table Page 1
- Page 22 and 23: ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS xix 19 A
- Page 24 and 25: Abbreviation Word in full PCR Polym
- Page 26 and 27: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 28 and 29: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 30 and 31: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 32 and 33: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 34 and 35: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 36 and 37: Table 2.1: The orthography of some
- Page 38 and 39: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 40 and 41: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 42 and 43: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 44 and 45: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 46 and 47: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 48 and 49: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 50 and 51: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 52 and 53: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 56 and 57: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 58 and 59: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 60 and 61: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 62 and 63: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 64 and 65: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 66 and 67: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 68 and 69: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 70 and 71: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 72 and 73: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 74 and 75: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 76 and 77: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 78 and 79: A B Incidence, distribution and cha
- Page 80 and 81: A B Incidence, distribution and cha
- Page 82 and 83: A Incidence, distribution and chara
- Page 84 and 85: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 86 and 87: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 88 and 89: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 90 and 91: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 92 and 93: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 94 and 95: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 96 and 97: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 98 and 99: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 100 and 101: Incidence, distribution and charact
- Page 102 and 103: Incidence, distribution and charact
<strong>Incidence</strong>, distribution <strong>and</strong> characteristics <strong>of</strong> major tomato leaf curl <strong>and</strong> mosaic virus diseases<br />
(biotin) ones. Furthermore, DNA hybridisation is very useful in that it can be used to test<br />
samples sent from normally poorly equipped laboratories in developing countries to<br />
advanced laboratories.<br />
One way <strong>of</strong> quickly differentiating geminiviruses is by sequence pairwise comparison<br />
<strong>and</strong> phylogenies (Padidam et al., 1995; Brown, 1997; Fauquet et al., 2003). However,<br />
there are different opinions. Some scientists feel that sequence comparisons could be<br />
based on the intergenic region <strong>and</strong> coat protein gene (Brown, 1997) in the absence <strong>of</strong> a<br />
complete DNA sequence, while others feel that full sequence comparisons (Fauquet et<br />
al., 2003) are necessary. In the absence <strong>of</strong> adequate resources, the former approach to<br />
geminivirus identification would be most appropriate for developing countries, whereas<br />
complete sequence comparisons would be encouraged, where possible.<br />
Based on results obtained by using the above techniques, <strong>and</strong> under the coordination <strong>of</strong><br />
the International Committee for the Taxonomy <strong>of</strong> Viruses (ICTV), tomato viruses have<br />
been characterized <strong>and</strong> grouped in orders, families, genera <strong>and</strong> species (Padidam et al.,<br />
1997; Fauquet <strong>and</strong> Mayo, 1999; Pringle, 1999; Mayo <strong>and</strong> Brunt, 2005).<br />
2.1.3 Virus Epidemiology <strong>and</strong> Vector Relationships<br />
2.1.3.1 Virus Transmission<br />
Viruses can be transmitted by mechanical means, <strong>and</strong> by pollen, seeds, fungi, nematodes,<br />
mites, as well as insects (Green <strong>and</strong> Kim, 1991; Green, 1991; Jones et al., 1991),<br />
although there is considerable specificity <strong>and</strong> any one virus is <strong>of</strong>ten transmitted by only<br />
some <strong>of</strong> these routes. Mechanical transmission is mostly restricted to non-persistent <strong>and</strong><br />
semi-persistent aphid-transmitted, leafhopper-transmitted <strong>and</strong> some whitefly-transmitted<br />
viruses (Brunt et al., 1990; Green 1991; Jones et al., 1991). Known insect vectors <strong>of</strong><br />
tomato viruses are beetles, aphids, leafhoppers, thrips <strong>and</strong> whiteflies (Lyons et al, 1985;<br />
Duffus, 1987; Black et al., 1991; Green <strong>and</strong> Kim, 1991 <strong>and</strong> Green, 1991; Jones et al.,<br />
31