11.06.2013 Views

Incidence, Distribution and Characteristics of Major Tomato Leaf ...

Incidence, Distribution and Characteristics of Major Tomato Leaf ...

Incidence, Distribution and Characteristics of Major Tomato Leaf ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Incidence</strong>, distribution <strong>and</strong> characteristics <strong>of</strong> major tomato leaf curl <strong>and</strong> mosaic virus diseases<br />

Samples IG1 <strong>and</strong> K1 (Table 3.2) tested positively to TYLCV-Is with degenerate primers<br />

PAL1v 1978 <strong>and</strong> PAR1c 715 (Rojas et al., 1993; Nakhla et al., 1993; Wyatt <strong>and</strong> Brown,<br />

1996), whereas seven more samples, i.e. IG2, IG3, RL1, RL2, K1, K3, <strong>and</strong> MB8 were<br />

positive with degenerate primers PARAv 494 <strong>and</strong> PARAc 1048 in PCR (Figure 3.12<br />

A,B, C, D<strong>and</strong> G), <strong>and</strong> were therefore identified to be geminiviruses.<br />

In another experiment where specific primers to TYLCV-Is were used to test for<br />

TYLCV, 5 samples were positive with primers PTYCRv 21 <strong>and</strong> PTYIRc 287 (Figure<br />

3.12 F), while 3 samples tested positive with primers PTYCR2v 1499 <strong>and</strong> PTYAL1c<br />

2196 (Figure 3.12 G). No isolate was positive with primers PTYC2c 1814 <strong>and</strong> PTYV2v<br />

466, as indicated in Figure 3.10 H. Samples ISOPOT <strong>and</strong> MB8, which clearly tested<br />

positive with primers PTYC2v 1499 <strong>and</strong> PTYAL1c 2196, did not form clear expected<br />

b<strong>and</strong>s in this PCR reaction with specific TYLCV primers PTYCRv 21<strong>and</strong> PTYIRc 287,<br />

even though earlier on they were positive to the same primers in PCR (Table 3.11). Of<br />

the 10 samples tested with specific primers PTLCV-UGrep2r <strong>and</strong> cp1f, only three<br />

isolates tested positive, as indicated in Figure 3.12 I. Results <strong>of</strong> both DNA Hybridisation<br />

<strong>and</strong> PCR are summarised in table 3.11. Samples that tested negative in all experiments<br />

were disregarded in this report.<br />

Genetic Identity <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tomato</strong> Yellow <strong>Leaf</strong> Curl Samples IGI, KI <strong>and</strong> RL5<br />

Yellow leaf curl samples IGI, KI <strong>and</strong> RL5 taken in 1998 (Table 3.2), <strong>and</strong> which<br />

consistently tested positively in DNA hybridisation <strong>and</strong> PCR experiments, were selected<br />

for further analysis. Further more, sample IG1 drew our attention because it also reacted<br />

to the general probe, while many other samples did not (Figure 3.9A). As such, cloning<br />

<strong>and</strong> sequencing was done for IG1, KI <strong>and</strong> RL5 isolates. Partial sequences <strong>of</strong> IG1 <strong>and</strong> RL5<br />

isolates were successfully generated. The sequence for K1 had many uncertain<br />

nucleotides <strong>and</strong> was therefore disregarded.<br />

81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!