Electrophysiological Evidence for Sentence Comprehension - Wings
Electrophysiological Evidence for Sentence Comprehension - Wings
Electrophysiological Evidence for Sentence Comprehension - Wings
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Experiment 4 ('quantifier'). The experiment consists of 200 word pairs and each pair<br />
consists of a cardinal number and a noun (Num. + N.). In 100 pairs the number precedes<br />
a countable noun (e.g. stolac ‘chair’ or šljiva ‘plum’) and in 100 pairs the number<br />
precedes a mass noun (i.e. an uncountable noun such as meso ‘meat’ or voće ‘fruit’). This<br />
constitutes the non-violation and violation condition, respectively. In this experiment the<br />
quantifying of the noun is manipulated; there<strong>for</strong>e, the experiment will be referred to as<br />
the ‘quantifier’ experiment. Since quantifiers are represented on the operator projection<br />
in RRG, a noun phrase in which a cardinal number precedes an uncountable noun<br />
contains a violation that can be traced to the operator projection of the NP.<br />
All nouns consisted of two syllables and were chosen on the basis of their frequency<br />
(according to Moguš et al., 1999). The numbers were all monosyllabic (dva ‘two’, tri<br />
‘three’, pet ‘five’ and šest ‘six’. The stimuli were presented visually, in a word-by-word<br />
manner. The numbers were presented in letters. Each word was on the computer screen<br />
<strong>for</strong> 600 ms and the ISI was 1100 ms. The pairs were separated by 1700 ms interval. After<br />
each 40-50 pairs a pause was inserted to allow participants a short brake. The participants<br />
had to make the grammaticality judgment by pressing one of two buttons on the response<br />
pad after the second word (the noun).<br />
4.2.3. The second group of experiments<br />
Experiment 5. This experiment is very similar to the ‘case’ experiment. It consists of 200<br />
SVO sentences out of which 100 contain the target word in the wrong case (Dative<br />
instead of Accusative). The target word was the last word in the sentence (the direct<br />
75