Electrophysiological Evidence for Sentence Comprehension - Wings
Electrophysiological Evidence for Sentence Comprehension - Wings
Electrophysiological Evidence for Sentence Comprehension - Wings
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ms with 1100 ms ISI. The sentences were separated by an interval of 1700 ms. After each<br />
20-25 sentences pauses were added to reduce fatigue and allow participants to blink<br />
frequently or move. In both conditions the final words were equalized in terms of<br />
frequency according to the Croatian frequency dictionary in the same way as in the 'case'<br />
experiment (Moguš et al., 1999). They were also equalized in terms of number of<br />
syllables and phonological difficulty (absence of consonant clusters longer than two<br />
phonemes). The only difference between the ‘case’ and ‘tense’ experiment is the word<br />
order. In the ‘tense’ experiment the word order is not canonical. This makes the stimulus<br />
sentences more unnatural than the ‘case’ experiment sentences. However, relatively free<br />
word order in Croatian in general and paying attention to the sentence focus (mainly by<br />
the choice of the adverb) reduced this unnaturalness of the stimulus sentences. Again, the<br />
participants were asked to make grammaticality judgments by pressing one of two<br />
buttons on the response pad.<br />
Experiment 3 ('gender'). This is an additional experiment aimed to show the difference in<br />
language processing on a level lower than the sentence, i.e. on a noun phrase level. It<br />
consists of 200 word pairs, adjectives and nouns (Adj. + N.). As adjectives have to agree<br />
in gender with the nouns they modify, the violation in agreement simply consists of<br />
mismatch between the gender of the adjective and the noun as in (23):<br />
(23) mal-i kuć-a<br />
small-Masc:Nom:Sg hause-Fem:Nom:Sg<br />
‘small house’<br />
73