10.06.2013 Views

Electrophysiological Evidence for Sentence Comprehension - Wings

Electrophysiological Evidence for Sentence Comprehension - Wings

Electrophysiological Evidence for Sentence Comprehension - Wings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

components. However, the models that he mentions in the article, mainly models that use<br />

key concepts of generative grammar, have at least one trait that is different from the DP<br />

model, the modularity. This also means that the Ullman's model is at least rather vague in<br />

questions such as primacy of syntax (as in 'syntax-first' models) or autonomy of syntax.<br />

Neurocognitive model of sentence comprehension. Friederici’s model (Friederici, 1995,<br />

2002) is the most influential ‘syntax-first’ model today. It provides both spatial and<br />

temporal in<strong>for</strong>mation about the processes that underlie language comprehension. The<br />

model is tested mainly in fMRI and ERP studies. It is a three-phase serial processing<br />

model; in the first phase the parser builds the sentence structure, in the second phase<br />

semantic in<strong>for</strong>mation is linked to the structure in terms of thematic roles assignment and<br />

in the third phase repair and reinterpretation processes take place. The model recognizes<br />

the role of memory in language comprehension: memory structures closely related to<br />

language function (phonological memory, memory <strong>for</strong> syntactic structures) and ‘general<br />

memory resources’. The three phases correspond to ERP components in the following<br />

order: first phase – ELAN, second phase – LAN, N400, and third phase – P600. The<br />

schematic overview of the model is given on Figure 2.<br />

34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!