Electrophysiological Evidence for Sentence Comprehension - Wings

More documents

Recommendations

Info

- Furlan, I. (1963). Govorni razvoj djeteta. Beograd, Savremena škola. - Furlan, I. (1973). Elementi programirane nastave u osnovnoj školi : prikaz pedagoškog istraživanja u eksperimentalnim osnovnim školama "Ivan Goran Kovačić", Borovo, "Marijan Grozaj", Ivanić Grad, "Ivan Goran Kovačić", Staro Petrovo Selo. Zagreb: Zavod za unapređivanje osnovnog obrazovanja SR Hrvatske. - Gathercole, S.E., Baddeley, A.D. (1993). Working Memory and Language, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. - Garman, M. (1990). Psycholinguistics. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. - Geschwind, N. (1972). Language and the brain. Scientific American, 226, 76-83. - Gibson, E. (1991). A Computational Theory of Human Linguistic Processing. Pittsburgh Carnegie Mellon University. - Gibson, E., Pearlmutter, N.J. (1998). Constraints on Sentence Comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 2, No. 7: 262-268. - Gorrell, P. (1989). Establishing the loci of serial and parallel effects in syntactic processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, No. 18: 61-73. - Greenberg, J. H. (1963). Some Universals of Language with Special Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements. In J. Greenberg (ed.) Universals of Language, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 73-113. - Gunter, T.C., Friederici, A. D. (1999). Concerning the automaticity of syntactic processing. Psychophysiology, 36, 126-137. 169
- Hagoort, P., Brown, C., Groothusen, J. (1993). The syntactic positive shift as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 439- 483. - Hagoort, P., Brown, C. M., Osterhout, L. (2000). The neurcognition of syntactic processing. In: C.M. Brown, P. Hagoort (eds.) The Neurocognition of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 283-316 - Hagoort, P. (2003). How the brain solves the binding problem for language: a neurocomputational model of syntactic processing. Neuroimage, No. 20: 18-29. - Hagoort,. P. (2005). On Broca, brain and Binding: a new framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 9, No. 9: 416-423. - Hahne, A. & Friederici, A. D. (1998). ERP evidence for autonomous first-pass parsing processes in auditory language comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Suppl., S125. - Halliday, M.A.K. (2004). An Introductin to Functional Grammar: Third Edition. London: Arnold. - Hickok, G. (1993). Parallel parsing: evidence from reactivation in garden-path sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, No. 22: 239-250. - Hickok, G. & Poeppel, D. (2004). Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. Cognition, 92, 67- 99. - Hickok, G. & Poeppel, D. (2007). The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Review. Neuroscience, 8(5), 393-402. 170
Page 1 and 2:
University of Zagreb Interdisciplin
Page 3 and 4:
TABLE OF CONTENT 1. Introduction 5
Page 5 and 6:
Electrophysiological results 131 5.
Page 7 and 8:
How people comprehend language is o
Page 9 and 10:
1.1. Sentence comprehension There i
Page 11 and 12:
syntactic structure obtained by the
Page 13 and 14:
this process many other factors pla
Page 15 and 16:
exploring sentence comprehension re
Page 17 and 18:
The major advantage of eye-tracking
Page 19 and 20:
ERP waveform. Components are conven
Page 21 and 22:
earlier syntactic component, early
Page 23 and 24:
enzyme activity, receptors or trans
Page 25 and 26:
the formulation of the models that
Page 27 and 28:
and disposes the wrong one as soon
Page 29 and 30:
not provide such an output. In the
Page 31 and 32:
itself) is called 'pragmatic normal
Page 33 and 34:
grammatical knowledge, resembling p
Page 35 and 36:
components. However, the models tha
Page 37 and 38:
The ‘syntax-first’ model is obv
Page 39 and 40:
in which any information is process
Page 41 and 42:
into brain functions that are not n
Page 43 and 44:
Figure 4. The layered structure of
Page 45 and 46:
Activity verbs, in contrast, refer
Page 47 and 48:
step in Levelt’s model perfectly
Page 49 and 50:
language functioning and (2) scores
Page 51 and 52:
are included, as well (e.g. the Bus
Page 53 and 54:
Binding, to be more precise) to exp
Page 55 and 56:
the changes in language related com
Page 57 and 58:
esearch project, as well. The proje
Page 59 and 60:
2. AIMS AND PROBLEMS 58
Page 61 and 62:
2.2. Sentence Comprehension in Typi
Page 63 and 64:
The hypotheses can be grouped accor
Page 65 and 66:
4. METHODS 64
Page 67 and 68:
On the basis of the test results 6
Page 69 and 70:
data collected within a group of ad
Page 71 and 72:
Figure 10. The presentation of the
Page 73 and 74:
The violation condition consists of
Page 75 and 76:
In Croatian adjectives usually prec
Page 77 and 78:
object). This constitutes the viola
Page 79 and 80:
‘tense’ experiments as well as
Page 81 and 82:
Phonological abilities were tested
Page 83 and 84:
. In addition, Homonyms, synonyms a
Page 85 and 86:
software was used. The caps employe
Page 87 and 88:
5.1. Adults 5.1.1. Behavioral resul
Page 89 and 90:
the processes underlying comprehens
Page 91 and 92:
Table 5. Statistical significance o
Page 93 and 94:
calculated by subtracting the non-c
Page 95 and 96:
assigned when the verb is presented
Page 97 and 98:
Figure 22. Average waveform for Pz
Page 99 and 100:
Table 8 gives the statistical signi
Page 101 and 102:
Figure 26. The LAN effect in the
Page 103 and 104:
Figure 28. P600 effect on the CPz e
Page 105 and 106:
Figure 30. The waveforms at the FCz
Page 107 and 108:
semantics distinction more relative
Page 109 and 110:
could, in fact, be the focus of the
Page 111 and 112:
Subject: Neuroscan EEG file: adults
Page 113 and 114:
Figure 38. The P600 in the ‘tense
Page 115 and 116:
Figure 41. Distribution maps in the
Page 117 and 118:
The results of the two experiments
Page 119 and 120: Statistical analysis reveals P600 e
Page 121 and 122: Subject: Neuroscan EEG file: chiten
Page 123 and 124: Subject: EEG file: chitensechin2_1s
Page 125 and 126: Subject: Neuroscan EEG file: casech
Page 127 and 128: Figure 55. Difference in latency be
Page 129 and 130: only relatively good instrument for
Page 131 and 132: similar words or pseudo-words. Quic
Page 133 and 134: Subject: Neuroscan EEG file: slicas
Page 135 and 136: Subject: EEG file: slicasechi2_1s.a
Page 137 and 138: Subject: Neuroscan EEG file: sli_te
Page 139 and 140: Table 25. ANOVA results for the fro
Page 141 and 142: Subject: Neuroscan EEG file: casech
Page 143 and 144: Subject: Neuroscan EEG file: chiten
Page 145 and 146: 5.3. General Discussion 5.3.1. Sent
Page 147 and 148: Croatian. In this respect ERP metho
Page 149 and 150: Figure 72. Difference between the e
Page 151 and 152: 5.3.3.. The results in the light of
Page 153 and 154: operator projection of the clause (
Page 155 and 156: Leonard’s words, of ‘low phonet
Page 157 and 158: the ‘case-chi’ experiment and t
Page 159 and 160: Six ERP experiments were performed
Page 161 and 162: corpus of data. Future work should
Page 163 and 164: - Aaronson, D., Scarborough, H.S. (
Page 165 and 166: - Bishop, D. V. M., Frazier-Norbury
Page 167 and 168: - Conti-Ramsden, G., Jones, M. (199
Page 169: - Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982).
Page 173 and 174: - Jurafsky, D. (2002). Probabilisti
Page 175 and 176: - Kovačević, M., Jelaska, Z., Kuv
Page 177 and 178: - Molfese, D., Molfese, V, Key, A.
Page 179 and 180: typically developing peers. Journal
Page 181 and 182: - Rumelhart, D.E., McClelland, J.L.
Page 183 and 184: - Tallal, P. (1976). Rapid auditory
Page 185 and 186: - Weber, F. M., Friederici, A. D. (
Page 187 and 188: LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. The proce
Page 189 and 190: Figure 54. Difference between adult
Page 191 and 192: SUMMARY The method of event-related
Page 193 and 194: EXTENDED SUMMARY IN CROATIAN SAŽET
Page 195 and 196: teorija jezične obrade (razumijeva
Page 197 and 198: (kad se događa radnja), taj se val
Page 199 and 200: eferenci. Modularnost se, s druge s
show all

Electrophysiological Evidence for Sentence Comprehension - Wings

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?