10.06.2013 Views

Electrophysiological Evidence for Sentence Comprehension - Wings

Electrophysiological Evidence for Sentence Comprehension - Wings

Electrophysiological Evidence for Sentence Comprehension - Wings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.3. General Discussion<br />

5.3.1. <strong>Sentence</strong> comprehension in adults<br />

The four experiments on adult Croatian speakers show that syntactic processing is not a<br />

unique process. It can be dissociated to other, more elementary processes that contribute<br />

to the building of the sentence structure and its interpretation. In this study this<br />

dissociation is defined in terms of the Role and Reference Grammar. According to this<br />

linguistic theory it is claimed that the elements of the operator projection are ‘quite<br />

different from predicates and their arguments’ (Van Valin, LaPolla, 1997:40).<br />

<strong>Electrophysiological</strong> results confirm this claim corroborating the idea that this linguistic<br />

theory can be taken as a processing model, as well. However, as the obtained results<br />

reveal, the electrophysiological trace of processing the data represented on the operator<br />

projection does not reveal a new syntax-related component, but indicates processes that<br />

are related to the integration of a part of sentence meaning, i.e. the point in time at which<br />

the action occurs (the difference can be characterized as a difference within a component,<br />

as the label N400’ suggests. This label emphasizes the functional side of the obtained<br />

component, i.e. semantic processing). It can be suggested that in order to explain these<br />

results, RRG - taken as a processing model - should be extended with another kind of<br />

syntax-to-semantics mapping in which elements of the operator projection would be<br />

mapped into a set of relations defined by philosophical logic (Van Benthem, 2002), as<br />

suggested above. In other words, it is not just the argument structure that is reconstructed<br />

in the sentence comprehension, but also temporal or spatial relations, speaker’s beliefs or<br />

probability of the action described in a sentence. A prediction can be made: in languages<br />

144

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!